|
|
|
| Effect comparison of skull puncture drainage and borehole drainage treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage |
| ZHAO Zhi-miao ZHANG Yu-long HU Chun-liang |
| Department of Neurosurgery, the First People′s Hospital of Nankang District in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341400, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of skull puncture drainage and borehole drainage treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Totally 40 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage treated in the department of neurosurgery of our hospital from March 2015 to June 2019 were selected as research subjects.They were divided into observation group(n=20)and control group(n=20)by the random number table method.Patients in the control group were treated with borehole drainage, and patients in the observation group were treated with skull puncture drainage.The total incidence of bleeding, surgical parameters, neurological impairment score, daily living ability score and therapeutic effect were compared between the two groups. Results The total incidence of bleeding in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The operation time, hospitalization time and hematoma clearance time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the scores of neurological impairment and the scores of daily living ability before treatment between the two groups (P＞0.05).On the 7th day after treatment, the scores of neurological impairment in both groups were lower than those before treatment, and the scores of daily living ability were higher than those before treatment,with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05).On the 7th day after treatment, the neurological impairment score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the daily living ability score was higher than that of the control group,with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).The total effective rate of the observation group (95.00%) was higher than that of the control group (70.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion For patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage, skull puncture drainage can significantly reduce the bleeding rate, shorten the hospital stay, reduce the hematoma clearance time, alleviate neurological impairment and improve quality of life.It is worth promoting in the clinic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
王忠诚，张玉琪，王忠诚.神经外科学[M].武汉：湖北科学技术出版社，2015：28-29.
|
| [2] |
张晓飞，刘兴宇，崔建忠，等.弥散张量成像技术在保守治疗高血压脑出血患者预后评估中的应用[J/OL].实用医学杂志，2019，35（15）：2465-2468.[2019-08-20]
|
| [3] |
黄建跃，丁胜鸿.微创血肿清除术对高血压脑出血患者氧化应激指标及神经功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志，2019，39（15）：3628-3630.
|
| [4] |
刘振锋，刘江峰，白凯，等.微创穿刺血肿引流术对老年高血压脑出血患者抑郁的影响研究[J].国际精神病学杂志，2015，42（6）：67-70.
|
| [5] |
加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南（2018 版）[J].中国实用外科杂志，2018，38（1）：1-20.
|
| [6] |
陈果，董伟.颅内微创穿刺血肿引流术治疗老年高血压脑出血的效果及对NT-proBNP、HMGB-1 和GM-CSF 水平的影响[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（2）：41-45.
|
| [7] |
韦拳堂，钟志伟，张子衡，等.颅内压监测在高血压脑出血微创治疗中的应用[J].实用医学杂志，2016，32（7）：1136-1139.
|
| [8] |
丁俊，郭西良，徐旭东，等.微创穿刺血肿清除术与小骨窗开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效比较[J].贵州医药，2018，42（6）：701-703.
|
| [9] |
康莹丽，杨晓菲，鲍海华，等.CT 定位辅助穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血疗效观察[J].临床军医杂志，2018，46（7）：824-826.
|
| [10] |
赵健，李晓辉，谢国强，等.3D-slicer 软件在高血压脑出血微创穿刺引流术中应用[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志，2018，44（5）：299-302.
|
| [11] |
邓如明.两种术式治疗高血压脑出血的疗效对比并分析术后复发的相关因素[J].安徽医学，2016，37（4）：435-438.
|
| [12] |
王载忠，李力，周莎莎，等.神经导航引导下微创穿刺引流对老年高血压性脑出血疗效及安全性研究[J].中华生物医学工程杂志，2017，23（4）：283-286.
|
| [13] |
杜洪澎，李珍珠，李泽福，等.3D 打印导板技术在脑出血微创穿刺引流术中的应用[J].中华神经医学杂志，2016，15（7）：674-677.
|
| [14] |
胡怡勇，邓文娟，邓丽娟.早期微创穿刺碎吸引流术治疗中小量基底核区高血压性脑出血疗效观察[J].新乡医学院学报，2016，33（9）：798-800.
|
| [15] |
姜京超，吕玉玲，彭龙锋，等.高压氧联合微创置管血肿穿刺术治疗高血压脑出血的临床研究[J].中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志，2017，24（1）：72-76.
|
|
|
|
