超声弹性成像和X线钼靶在乳腺肿块BI-RADS分类诊断中的价值

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (18)
Related Citation (11)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the value of ultrasound elastography and X-ray molybdenum target in the classification of breast masses by BI-RADS.Methods From January 2017 to December 2018, 55 patients with breast masses treated in our hospital were selected as the study objects, and all of them were diagnosed by ultrasound elastography and X-ray molybdenum target BI-RADS classification.The related indicators as well as the value to the diagnosis of breast lumps in different diameter were compared between tultrasound elastography and mammography BI-RADS.Results The histopathologic results showed 35 malignant lesions and 20 benign lesions.There was no significant difference in the accuracy of ultrasound elastography BI-RADS classification in diagnosis of breast masses compared with molybdenum target BI-RADS classification, and the difference was statistically significant (P＞0.05).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of ultrasound elastography BI-RADS classification in diagnosing tumors less than 1 cm in diameter were lower than those of X-ray mammography BI-RADS classification, and the difference was statistically significant (P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosis between 1-2 cm diameter masses and BI-RADS classification (P＞0.05).The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter were higher than those of X-ray mammography BI-RADS classification diagnosis,and the difference was statistically significant (P＞0.05).Conclusion Both ultrasound elastography and X-ray mammography BI-RADS have a high diagnostic value to breast lumps classification, with their own advantages in the diagnosis of breast lumps in different diameter.

Key words： Ultrasound elastography X-ray mammography Breast tumor BI-RADS classification

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LUO Yu-duan
	WANG Jia-xin
	CHEN Man-qing
	DU Yu-hong

Cite this article:

LUO Yu-duan,WANG Jia-xin,CHEN Man-qing, et al. Value of ultrasound elastography and X-ray molybdenum target in the classification of breast masses by BI-RADS[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(8): 137-139转143.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I8/137

[1]	Zhang Y，Ma AD，Jia HX.Correlation betwcen molybdenum target mammogaphy signs and pathological prognostic factors of breast cancer[J].J Biol Regul Homeost Agents，2015，30（1）：219-225.
[2]	钟嵘，吕国荣，沈浩霖，等.全自动乳腺容积扫描和常规超声对乳腺BI-RADS分类价值的比较[J].中国超声医学杂志，2016，32（2）：121-123.
[3]	薛永铭，张静.乳腺癌诊断中超声弹性成像、常规超声、钼靶X线技术的应用[J].中国急救医学，2016，36（s2）：381-384.
[4]	程任捷，唐文成.多种超声技术与X线钼靶联合诊断乳腺癌的应用价值[J].中国临床研究，2017，30（8）：1123-1125.
[5]	朱庆莉，姜玉新.乳腺影像报告与数据系统指南（第5版）超声内容更新介绍[J].中华医学超声杂志（电子版），2016，13（1）：5-7.
[6]	Adamo B，Ricciardi GRR，Ieni A，et al.The prognostic significance of combined androgen receptor，E-Cadherin，Ki67 and CK5/6 expression in patients with triple negative breast cancer[J].Oncotarget，2017，8（44）：76 974-76 986.
[7]	韩洁莹，冯嘉贤，饶思旌，等.超声弹性成像、钼靶X线在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值[J].吉林医学，2017，28（5）：814-817.
[8]	王瑞清，徐江，战介芝，等.超声弹性成像与钼靶X线诊断乳腺癌的对比研究[J].中国实用临床医学，2018，9（4）：22-24.
[9]	赵青，牟洋，赵献萍，等.超声弹性成像与钼靶对乳腺肿块BIRADS分类诊断价值[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志，2017，31（6）：589-591.
[10]	梁金花，冯建平，梁建雄，等.超声弹性成像联合数字化钼靶摄影对乳腺肿瘤的鉴别价值[J].中国当代医药，2018，25（12）：76-78.
[11]	卢丽萍，李荆，钟创锋，等.多种超声技术与X线钼靶联合诊断乳腺癌的应用价值[J].临床超声医学杂志，2016，18（4）：237-239.
[12]	Zhang K，Luo Z，Zhang Y，et al.Detection and analysis of circulating large intergenic non-coding RNA regulator of reprogramming in plasma for breast cancer[J].Thoracic Cancer，2017，9（1）：66-74.
[13]	秦甫.乳腺钼钯、超声弹性成像与MRI 临床用于诊断乳腺癌的随机对照分析[J].中国CT和MRI 杂志，2016，14（1）：66-68.
[14]	金燕燕，宋会明，王谷一，等.高频彩色多普勒超声与超声弹性成像诊断乳腺癌的临床对比分析[J].医学影像学杂志，2017，27（7）：1398-1400.
[15]	杨浩，陈文卫，尹家保.超声弹性成像联合核磁共振成像诊断乳腺癌的临床价值[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（25）：130-133.
[16]	Chen YM，Liu Y，Wei HY，et al.Large intergenic noncoding RNAROR reverses gemcitabine-induced autophagy and apoptosis in breast cancer cells[J].Oncotarget，2016，7（37）：59 604-59 617.
[17]	王丹青，杜睿，陈颖，等.超声弹性成像应变率比值法与X 射线钼靶对BI-RADS Ⅳ级合并乳腺癌的相关性研究[J].现代医药卫生，2015，31（21）：3212-3213，3216.
[18]	张敏丽，刘东顺，贾七英，等.超声弹性成像与数字乳腺X线对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复，2016，2（4）：412-414.