|
|
|
| Clinical effect comparison between the mammatone minimally invasive rotary resection and conventional mastectomy in the treatment of benign breast masses |
| LAI Qing KE Hua LIU Bao CHEN Sheng-xuan LI Xiao-hong |
| The Sixth Department of Surgery,People′s Hospital of Yangchun City,Guangdong Province,Yangchun 529600,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect between mammatone minimally invasive rotary resection and conventional mastectomy in the treatment of benign breast masses.Methods A total of 92 patients with benign breast masses admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to February 2019 were selected as the research subjects,and they were randomly divided into the comparison group (n=46) and the experimental group (n=46) according to the time of admission.Patients in the experimental group were treated with mammatone minimally invasive rotary resection,and patients in the comparison group were treated with conventional mastectomy.The operation time,postoperative healing time,intraoperative blood loss,scar length,total incidence rate of complication,total effective rate of treatment,and scores of life quality before and after treatment in the two groups were observed and compared.Results The operation time and postoperative healing time of patients in the experimental group were shorter than those in the comparison group,intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the comparison group,and scar length was shorter than that in the comparison group,with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05).The quality of life score of the experimental group after treatment was higher than that of the comparison group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The total incidence rate of complications in the experimental group (2.17%) was lower than that in the comparison group (15.22%),with statistically significant difference (P ＜0.05).The total effective rate of treatment in the experimental group (97.83%) was higher than that in the comparison group (84.78%),with statistically significant difference (P＜0.05).Conclusion Mammatone minimally invasive rotary resection in the treatment of patients with benign breast masses can improve the quality of life,reduce the incidence of complications,improve the total effective rate of treatment,shorten the operation time,accelerate the postoperative healing,reduce intraoperative blood loss and shorten the scar length,which is worth promoting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
姚慧韬，范庆浩，赵涵.乳腺良性肿瘤应用单人操作麦默通旋切系统治疗疗效分析[J].中华内分泌外科杂志，2017，11（2）：127-130.
|
| [2] |
秦艳，周东华，朱婧.44例乳腺肿物麦默通微创旋切术后的病理结果[J].临床与病理杂志，2019，39（1）：39-43.
|
| [3] |
李亚玲，朱铖.ECMR 四步法降低麦默通乳腺良性肿瘤切除的残留率[J].中华普通外科杂志，2017，32（6）：526-527.
|
| [4] |
李勇，贾晓斌.超声引导下麦默通旋切系统在乳腺纤维腺瘤治疗中的价值[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（16）：3994-3996.
|
| [5] |
王超，张乘，冯海湛，等.麦默通微创旋切术加置引流对乳腺良性肿物患者术后恢复与并发症的影响[J].实用医学杂志，2018，34（11）：1881-1884，1888.
|
| [6] |
杨波，唐诗，曾鸿，等.超声引导下麦默通旋切活检术对乳腺癌诊断价值的临床研究[J].中国妇幼保健，2018，33（4）：929-931.
|
| [7] |
龙登锋，黄自铎.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切技术在乳腺病灶切除活检中的应用[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（7）：1571-1574.
|
| [8] |
程少先，徐文礼，艾瑞华.超声引导麦默通乳腺肿物切除术的并发症及防治[J].中国现代普通外科进展，2017，20（9）：712-714.
|
| [9] |
李建，樊华，贺晓斌，等.超声引导麦默通乳腺术治疗良性肿瘤的疗效及激素水平观察[J].实用癌症杂志，2017，32（10）：1628-1630.
|
| [10] |
倪道勇，朱建东，卓文方.超声引导下麦默通微创旋切手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的效果观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志，2018，25（S1）：55，57.
|
| [11] |
林菊丽，朱瞻琳，毛贺辉，等.麦默通微创术治疗较大乳腺肿物的效果及并发症分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2018，33（9）：228-231.
|
| [12] |
宋先旭，李宏海，吴妍.麦默通旋切手术在良性乳腺肿物中的作用[J].中国现代普通外科进展，2018，21（3）：204.
|
| [13] |
王蓉，郑媛，钱崇崴，等.麦默通旋切术治疗乳腺导管内乳头状瘤疗效观察[J].医学临床研究，2018，35（9）：1844-1845.
|
| [14] |
薛文雄，董志毅，王宏.麦默通乳腺微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺良性肿块临床效果的对比观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2017，16（18）：1813-1816.
|
| [15] |
杨梅，高海燕，张晓兰.麦默通微创旋切手术与常规乳腺肿物切除术治疗良性乳腺肿物的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志，2017，21（21）：107-108.
|
| [16] |
林俊青，高峰，冯艳玉，等.麦默通微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的对比研究[J].国际外科学杂志，2017，44（3）：171-175.
|
| [17] |
廖桦，方志红，陈龙林.麦默通微创旋切系统与传统手术治疗乳腺良性病变的对比分析[J].中国医药科学，2019，9（11）：211-213，247.
|
|
|
|
