经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切治疗良性前列腺增生症的可行性及对患者生活质量的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the feasibility of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and its influence on the quality of life of patients. Methods A total of 57 patients with BPH who came to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected as research objects and divided into the experimental group with 27 cases and the control group with 30 cases by random number table method. The experimental group was treated by TUPKP. The control group was treated with traditional transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). The changes of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, indwelling catheter time, hospitalization time,international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, maximum urinary flow rate (QMAX), total complication incidence rate and so on were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), the amount of bleeding in the experimental group was less than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05). There were no significant differences in indwelling catheter time, hospitalization time, IPSS, QOL scores and QMAX between the two groups before and one month after operation (P＞0.05). The total incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion TUPKP is effective in the treatment of BPH, especially in improving the quality of life of patients.

Key words： Benign prostatic hyperplasia Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate Transurethral resection of prostate Postoperative complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIAO Wei-xuan

Cite this article:

LIAO Wei-xuan. Feasibility of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and its influence on patients′ quality of life[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(7): 82-84.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I7/82

[6]	程旭，王荫槐.良性前列腺增生症微创治疗的进展[J].现代泌尿外科杂志，2018，23（7）：547-552.
[7]	孟庆利，江彬，侯旭，等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床疗效比较[J].贵州医药，2019，43（1）：62-64.
[8]	白连坤，张新国.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗前列腺增生的疗效分析[J].中国现代药物应用，2017，11（2）：24-26.
[9]	邹火生，黄裕清，余自强.TUPKP 对良性前列腺增生切除术中出血量、持续膀胱冲洗时间、尿管留置时间的影响[J].现代医学，2017，45（4）：21-24.
[10]	刘和谦，陈弋生，邹滨，等.经尿道前列腺电切术严重并发症的临床分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志，2016，37（7）：515.
[1]	张浩，俞洪元.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的临床研究[J].中国性科学，2019，28（5）：19-23.
[2]	王宁华，苏元华，董锐，等.经尿道等离子双极电切术与开放式前列腺切除术对前列腺增生患者性功能的影响[J].中国性科学，2017，26（7）：8-11.
[3]	中国研究型医院学会泌尿外科学专业委员会. 中国良性前列腺增生症经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗指南（2018标准版）[J].中华医学杂志，2018，98（20）：1549.
[5]	《泌尿外科杂志》编辑部.《良性前列腺增生诊断治疗指南》解读：诊断篇[J].泌尿外科杂志（电子版），2011，3（3）：51-54.
[4]	Bechis SK，Otsetov AG，Ge R，et al.Personalized medicine for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].J Urol，2014，192（1）：16.
[11]	古军.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生的疗效及对尿道功能的影响[J].中国现代医生，2018，56（4）：29-31，38.
[12]	贾斌，付凤林，周玉石.经尿道等离子腔内剜除术和经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床效果对比[J].中国疗养医学，2018，27（8）：830-832.
[13]	翁鸿，曾宪涛，任选义，等.经尿道等离子双极电切术与钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志，2018，18（8）：840-849.
[14]	孙景辉.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的安全性与疗效比较[J].甘肃医药，2018，37（5）：431-432.
[15]	曾宪涛，翁鸿.中国良性前列腺增生症经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗指南（2018 简化版）[J].巴楚医学，2018，1（3）：1-5.