|
|
|
| Effect comparison of hysteroscopic hydrotubation and conventional hydrotubation in the treatment of infertility |
| DAI Jing-xi |
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Zhangzhou Third Hospital,Fujian Province,Zhangzhou 363005,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of hysteroscopic hydrotubationand conventional hydrotubation in the treatment ofinfertility,so as to provide basis for clinical practice.MethodsFrom January 2015 to January 2016,80 patients with infertility treated in our hospital were selected as subjects.Salpingography indicated they were all suffered from fallopian tube blockage at the proximal end.By the random number table method,they were evenly divided into control group and observation group,40 cases in each group.Patients in the control group were treated with conventional hydrotubation,and the patients in the observation group were treated by hysteroscopic hydrotubation.They were both provided with one-year follow-up visits after surgery.The intraoperative amount of bleeding,operation time,time to be off bed after surgery,andcurative effect were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the observation group,the intraoperative amount of bleeding was greatly less than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in operation time or time to be off bed after surgery between the two groups (P＞0.05).The total effectiveness rate in the control group was 62.50%,it was significantly lower than that in the observation group accounting for 81.25%,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The success rate of pregnancy in the observation group was 56.3%,which was significantly higher than that in the control groupaccouting for 37.5%,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The average pregnancy time in the observation group was[(4.1±0.9)months],it was markedly shorter than that in the control group [(5.3±1.1)months],and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).ConclusionCompared with conventional hydrotubation,hysteroscopic hydrotubation is more effective on treating fallopian tube blockage at the proximal end,and also more likely to be accepted by patients,which is worthy of further promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
蒋依伶，李科珍.不孕症女性患者心理健康状况调查分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2015，23（4）：229-231.
|
| [2] |
龙玲，李静，彭倩，等.女性不孕症患者心理弹性、社会支持与生育应激的相关研究[J].重庆医学，2015，2（3）：426-427.
|
| [3] |
林姬，林立恒.输卵管堵塞导致的不孕症患者行输卵管通液术的疗效观察[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（21）：4521-4522.
|
| [4] |
白雪，李冬梅，郝妍，等.输卵管通液术前后患者血清中炎性因子的表达及意义[J].中国妇幼保健，2015，30（11）：1752-1754.
|
| [5] |
李文香，安新涛，焦守凤，等.宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液治疗不孕不育的临床疗效[J].中国性科学，2016，25（9）：110-112.
|
| [6] |
陶雪峰，侯俊霞，崔世红.宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液术在输卵管阻塞性不孕患者治疗中的优势[J].中国临床研究，2016，29（1）：92-94.
|
| [7] |
张学敏，陈涛，肖亚莉.碘海醇及YLD-200输卵管通液诊疗仪在子宫输卵管造影中的诊疗价值分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志，2015，26（4）：285-288.
|
| [8] |
Kahyaoglu S，Ertas E，Kahyaoglu I，et al.Does laparoscopic cystectomy and cauterization of endometriomas greater than 3 cm diminish ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulationduringIVF-ET？Acase-controlstudy[J].JObstet Gynaecol Re，2008，34（6）：1010-1013.
|
| [9] |
苑杰，贾娜娜，庞静娟，等.不孕不育患者抑郁焦虑情绪影响因素研究进展[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（15）：48-51.
|
| [10] |
杨丽，周飞京，董悦芝.不孕不育患者的心理压力对生育生活质量的影响[J].郑州大学学报（医学版），2015，5（5）：703-706.
|
| [11] |
江酉琼，曾玖芝，帅志容，等.不孕不育门诊开展健康宣教的效果分析[J].实用医院临床杂志，2015，2（3）：88-90.
|
| [12] |
香钰婷，张婧，陈醒，等.输卵管堵塞诊治效果与子宫内膜异位症的相关性研究[J].中国妇产科临床杂志，2015，11（4）：292-296.
|
| [13] |
赵新华，徐韶杰，苏东辉，等.腹腔镜联合中药治疗输卵管堵塞所致不孕的临床分析[J].世界中医药，2015，22（A2）：1331-1332.
|
| [14] |
骆成玉.腔镜技术在乳腺癌治疗应用及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志，2015，35（7）：721-723.
|
| [15] |
王平，王勇.腔镜技术在甲状腺癌治疗中合理应用[J].中国实用外科杂志，2015，35（6）：639-642.
|
| [16] |
蔡妮.腹腔镜输卵管术后不同时间使用羧氨基葡聚多糖钠生物胶体液进行子宫输卵管通液疗效比较[J].中国新药与临床杂志，2015，34（5）：399-401.
|
| [17] |
孔佳，张颖佳，李斌.SonoVue子宫输卵管超声造影与宫腹腔镜联合输卵管通液比较[J].中国内镜杂志，2015，21（1）：94-96.
|
|
|
|
