|
|
|
| Value analysis of five-joint inspection for vaginitis in leucorrhea routine inspection |
| LUO Yuan-sheng PENG Xin-hua |
| Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ji′an Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Ji′an 343000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the value of five-joint inspection for vaginitis in leucorrhea routine inspection.Methods From February 2015 to February 2018, 320 female patients admitted to our gynecological clinic were selected as study objects and they were divided into the microscopic examination method group and five-joint inspection method for vaginitis group according to the examination method, there were 160 cases in each group. The detection rate of vaginitis and vaginal cleanliness of the two groups were analyzed. Results The positive rate of vaginitis in the five-joint examination method for vaginitis group was 78.13%, which was significantly higher than that in the microscopic examination method group (63.35%), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The detection rate of leucocytosis, Lactobacillus and Trichomonas vaginalis was 10.00%, 38.13% and 6.88% respectively in the five-joint inspection method for vaginitis group for vaginitis, and it was 8.75%, 35.63% and 10.00% in the microscopic examination method group respectively, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (P＞0.05). The detection rate of bacterial vaginitis (BV) and Candida was 12.50% and 10.63% respectively in the five-joint inspection method for vaginitis group, which was significantly higher than that in the microscopic examination method group (5.00%, 4.38%)respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the results of vaginal cleanliness between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion The effect of the five-joint method for vaginitis detecting Candida and BV is better than routine examination. It is helpful for clinical diagnosis and has high accuracy.It is worth further discussion and promotion in clinic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
吴晓红.白带常规检验中阴道炎五联检的应用价值评价[J].医药卫生（全文版），2017，11（2）：00275.
|
| [2] |
姜昌丽，李翠娟，李雪梅，等.阴道分泌物五联检法与显微镜检测法的对比分析[J].检验医学与临床，2017，14（6）：823-824.
|
| [3] |
王伟娟，杨焦峰，康丽霞，等.阴道分泌物五联检临床应用[J].新乡医学院学报，2015，32（3）：275-277.
|
| [4] |
沈莉，卢红梅，梁芳芳.阴道炎五联检验对阴道炎病原体诊断与白带清洁度检测的应用效果分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2015，12（1）：216-218..
|
| [5] |
马勇.阴道炎五联检验法在白带清洁度、病原体诊断中的应用价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2017，25（6）：411-414.
|
| [6] |
程俊，张静.一种新型的阴道分泌物检测方法和常规镜检的比较[J].中南医学科学杂志，2015，9（6）：685-687.
|
| [7] |
勾朝阳，丁可，范泽旭.阴道炎感染患者不同方法检测病原体的对比分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2015，10（6）：77-78
|
| [8] |
许玉苗，吕鹏，储秋菊，等.五项酶联合检测在需氧菌性阴道炎诊断与治疗中的作用[J].中国微生态学杂志，2015，27（11）：1339-1341.
|
| [9] |
吴丽萍，周玉培，王学涵.阴道分泌物五联检与显微镜镜检的方法学比较[J].检验医学与临床，2015（z2）：19-21.
|
| [10] |
陈新宇.白带常规检测中阴道炎五联检的应用价值分析[J].中外医学研究，2016，14（21）：51-53.
|
| [11] |
刘贵珍.五联检检测4456 例阴道分泌物病原体分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报，2013，38（8）：1025-1027.
|
| [12] |
陈燕明.阴道炎五联检在白带常规检测中的应用研究[J].养生保健指南，2016，7（20）：348-348.
|
| [13] |
陈秀兰，袁学华，赵嵩，等.阴道炎五联检试剂盒的临床应用价值研究[J].临床血液学杂志（输血与检验），2014（1）：122-123.
|
| [14] |
郑阳，陈良.阴道炎五联检试剂盒检测245 例白带样本的结果分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志，2017，11（18）：2660-2662.
|
| [15] |
王海萍，龙思方.400 例白带阴道炎五联检和显微镜法测结果比较分析[J].黔南民族医专学报，2015（3）：161-162.
|
|
|
|
