|
|
Application value of ultrasound-guided transversal abdominis plane block in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia of cesarean section |
WEN Ri-xin WANG Xing-gao LIAO Rong-zhen ZHUO Rui CHEN Guang-tian |
Ultrasound guidance;Transversal abdominis plane;Cesarean section;Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application value of ultrasound-guided transversal abdominis plane (TAP) block in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia of cesarean section.Methods Sixty puerpera who underwent cesarean section with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia from March 2017 to March 2018 admitted to our hospital were divided into experimental group and control group according to the random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.The control group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia + traditional TAP block anesthesia,while the experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia + ultrasound-guided TAP block.The heart rate,mean arterial pressure and pain score (visual analogue scale [VAS]score) before the incision,at the time of delivery and at the end of the operation of the two groups were compared.The pain scores at 2,4,8,16,24,and 36 h after surgery of the two groups were compared.The occurrence of intraoperative traction reaction,adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting)of the two groups were compared.The number of times that the analgesic pump was pressed,and the time required for the first time to go to the ground of the two groups were compared.Results The heart rate,mean arterial pressure and VAS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group before skin incision,at the time of fetal delivery and at the end of the operation,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups 2 h after operation (P>0.05).The VAS scores of the experimental group at 4,8,16,24,36 h after delivery were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The incidence of traction reaction and adverse reactions during operation in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group,the number of times that the analgesic pump was pressed was fewer than that in the control group,and the time required for the first time to go to the ground was shorter than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionUltrasound-guided TAP block is more effective in cesarean section combined with spinal and epidural anesthesia.It can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and relieve postoperative pain,thus it is worthy of promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李保华,熊莹.腰-硬联合麻醉剖宫产术后超声引导双侧TAP 阻滞的镇痛效果观察[J].中国合理用药探索,2019,16(2):112-116.
|
[2] |
郑珈琳,钟庆.超声引导下连续腹横肌平面阻滞与持续硬膜外镇痛在剖宫产术后[J].西南军医,2019,21(1):31-35.
|
[3] |
钟玫,林风琼,蒙剑德.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产手术镇痛中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(24):77-79.
|
[4] |
张日凤.超声引导双侧TAP 阻滞在剖宫产术后的应用价值[J].湖北科技学院学报(医学版),2018,32(3):230-233.
|
[5] |
刘航.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞技术联合罗哌卡因切口局部麻醉在胃癌术后镇痛中的应用[J].影像研究与医学应用,2018,2(7):134-136.
|
[6] |
王悦.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛中应用价值研究[J].临床军医杂志,2018,46(1):106-108.
|
[7] |
占大兴,邹高锐,陈超,等.局部浸润镇痛和腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果比较[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(34):58-61.
|
[8] |
容青霖,刘羽,包胜华.剖宫产术后镇痛应用不同浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞的临床分析[J].广州医药,2017,48(6):22-25.
|
[9] |
程邵洪,郭小平.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对剖宫产术后镇痛的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(21):3214-3215,3218.
|
[10] |
张国梁,任燕,孟明华,等.超声引导下连续腹横肌平面阻滞对剖宫产产妇术后镇痛的效果[J].山东医药,2017,57(37):84-86.
|
[11] |
周国伟,何桂香.腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛的应用[J].浙江创伤外科,2017,22(1):181-183.
|
[12] |
刘欣,姜山,孔繁丽,等.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉时术中及术后效果观察[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(8):629-632.
|
[13] |
王琳,徐铭军,魏江.超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞对剖宫产术后镇痛的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(7):661-664.
|
[14] |
宋涛.超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛的临床应用[J].中国医药导刊,2016,18(4):353-354,356.
|
[15] |
黄焱明.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术后镇痛效果观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(24):5631-5632.
|
[16] |
曲轶涛.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(32):193-195.
|
[17] |
陈红芽,徐铭军.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛中的应用[J].北京医学,2015,37(8):752-754.
|
[18] |
李莞盈,丁文刚,李文志.腹横肌平面阻滞在剖宫产术中的应用[J].现代医学,2015,43(7):938-941.
|
|
|
|