米索前列醇不同给药途径在终止13～20周妊娠中的效果分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (35 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To determine effect of different ways of administration of Misoprostol on the termination of the mid-trimester pregnancy (13-20 weeks).Methods A total of 252 cases of receiving termination of the mid-trimester pregnancy in our hospital from June 2014 to June 2015 were selected.They were randomly divided into oral administration group(OA group),sublingual administration group(SA group),and vaginal administration group(VA group),84 cases in each group.Three groups were given Mifepristone 75 mg every time in the morning and night in the first day and the second day,Misoprostol 600 μg in the third day morning respectively.The abortion effects,adverse reactions and acceptability between the three groups were analyzed.Results There was no statistical difference in the beginning time of the abdominal pain and number hemorrhage among three groups(P＞0.05).The complete abortion rate and success rates of abortion in 24 h of the VA group and SA group were statistically significant higher than OA group.The abortion time of OA group were significantly longer than that in the VA group and SA group.No statistically significant differences in the incidence of the side-effect including fever,headache and so on (P＞0.05).Oral administration and sublingual administration were more acceptable than that in the VA group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion The vaginal administration and sublingual administration of Misoprostol on the termination of the mid-trimester pregnancy have many advantages：high complete abortion rate,short abortion time,high success rates of abortion in 24 h,fewer side-effects.And sublingual administration were more acceptable by patients.

Key words： Misoprostol Mifepristone Induced abortion Drug administration routes

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HOU Feng
	ZHOU Ping
	XING Jia-ling

Cite this article:

HOU Feng,ZHOU Ping,XING Jia-ling. Effect analysis of different ways of administration of Misoprostol on termination of gestation for 13 to 20 weeks[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(23): 118-120.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I23/118

[1]	Hou SP，Fang AH，Chen QF，et al.Termination of secondtrimester pregnancy by mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate：a systematic review of Chinese trials[J].Contraception，2011，84（3）：214-223.
[2]	邓建梅.超小剂量米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止早期妊娠的临床观察[J].现代医院，2016，16（4）:128-130.
[3]	程丽村，范晓芳，吕燕萍，等.米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止16～24周妊娠临床多中心研究[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2014，22（5）：329-344.
[4]	钱金凤，王彩燕，诸葛听，等.米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止16～24周妊娠的临床研究[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2015，23（7）：461-464.
[5]	Sun Y，Fang M，Davies H，et al.Misoprostol：a potential clinical agent based on its anti-progesterone and anti-glucocorticoid properties[J].Gynecol Endocrinol，2014，30（3）：169-173.
[6]	钱金凤，经小平，武淑英，等.米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止8～16周妊娠有效性及安全性的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志，2015，23（1）：25-28.
[9]	刘春兰，方芳，冯妍军，等.米索前列醇口服与舌下含服对药物流产结局的影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2011，19（10）：622-624.
[15]	胡宗琼，罗建蓉，袁明香，等.米索前列醇不同用法对孕早、中期扩张宫颈效果的比较性研究[J].世界临床药物，2009，30（9）：538-541.
[7]	Bhattacharjee N，Saha SP，Ghoshroy SC，et al.A randomised comparative study on sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 13 to 20 weeks[J].Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol，2008，48（2）：165-171.
[8]	Tang OS，Schweer H，Seyberth HW，et al.Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol[J].Hum Reprod，2002，17（2）：332-336.
[10]	Nautiyal D，Mukherjee K，Perhar I，et al.Comparative Study of Misoprostol in first and second Trimester abortions by oral，sublingual， and vaginal routes[J].J Obstet Gynaecol India，2015，65（4）：246-250.
[11]	Aronsson A，Bygdeman M，Gemzell-Danielsson K.Effects of misoprostol on contractility following different routes of administration[J].Hum Roprod，2004，19（1）：81-84.
[12]	Dickinson JE，Jennings BG，Doherty DA.Mifepristone and oral，vaginal，or sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester abortion：a randomized controlled trial[J].Obstet Gynecol，2014，123（6）：1162-1168.
[13]	Ganguly RP，Saha SP，Mukhopadhyay S，et al.A comparative study on sublingual versus oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for late first and early second trimester abortion[J].J Indian Med Assoc，2010，108（5）：283-284.
[14]	Raghaban S，Comendant R，Digol I，et al.Two-pill regiments of misoprostol after mifepristone medical abortion through 63 days gestational age：a randomized controlled trial of sublingual and oral misoprostol[J].Contraception，2009，79（2）：84-90.