腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放疝环充填式无张力修补术的临床效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (14)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and open-filling tension-free herniorrhaphy.Methods From January 2015 to January 2017,78 patients with inguinal hernia were selected.According to random number table method,they were divided into the study group (n=40)and the control group (n=38).The two groups were treated by laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (TEP)and open hernia ring filling tensionfree repair respectively.The perioperative indexes,postoperative complications and recurrence in one year were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results The time of getting out of bed,the time of hospitalization and the duration of postoperative pain in the study group were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05),and the amount of intraoperative bleeding was lesser than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups(P＞0.05),but the cost of hospitalization of the study group were higher than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications such as incision infection,urinary retention,scrotal emphysema,serum swelling and neurosensory abnormality were not significantly different between the two groups (P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative recurrence between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion TEP and open hernia ring filling tension-free repair are safe and effective methods for inguinal hernia.Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty is more minimally invasive and faster recovery,but there is no obvious advantage in postoperative complications,and the cost of treatment is high.It is recommended to select the appropriate operation method according to the specific conditions of the patients.

Key words： Inguinal hernia Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy Tension-free repair Efficacy comparison

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Ri-xiong
	WU Zu-guang
	LI En
	ZHANG Zhuo-xin
	ZENG Hai-jing
	LI Zhi-wang
	WU Wei-sheng

Cite this article:

ZHANG Ri-xiong,WU Zu-guang,LI En, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy between laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and open filling tension-free repair[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(20): 31-33.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I20/31

[4]	宋传健，张正旭，姜长滨.无张力疝修补手术治疗成人疝气的疗效观察[J].中国卫生标准管理，2015，6（16）：52-53.
[5]	陶红光，宗华.腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J].中国当代医药，2016，23（25）：22-24.
[1]	汪江，龚建云，邱学辉，等.腹腔镜疝修补手术与开放式无张力疝修补手术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效观察[J].中外医学研究，2014，12（5）：27-28.
[2]	缪龙生，曹红勇，马宁，等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外间隙与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝临床疗效的Meta分析[J].现代医学，2014，42（6）：593-600.
[3]	张晓庆，陈仰霞，许沈南.无张力疝修补术式与传统术式治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效对比分析[J].吉林医学，2016，37（10）：2503-2504.
[6]	莫春林.传统腹股沟疝修补术、疝环充填式无张力疝修补术及腹腔镜疝修补术的临床比较[J].深圳中西医结合杂志，2015，25（22）：26-28.
[7]	荆波，张建.经腹腔镜全腹膜外无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果观察[J].当代医学，2015，21（21）：27-28.
[8]	尹照成.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效对比[J].吉林医学，2017，38（2）：285-287.
[9]	罗敏.传统腹股沟疝修补术、疝环充填式无张力疝修补术及腹腔镜疝修补术的临床比较[J].延边医学，2015，13（13）：122-123.
[10]	吴立胜，汪宏.完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中出血的原因分析及处理[J].中国微创外科杂志，2013，13（7）：656-658.
[11]	张咏，董晶，王丽.观察对腹外疝患者采用腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术进行治疗的临床效果[J].当代医学，2017，23（33）：105-106.
[12]	赵海生，张晓华，黄明华.成人女性腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与开放手术术中不同处理方式及效果的比较分析[J].国际医药卫生导报，2015，21（11）：1547-1550.
[13]	吴任鸿，李佳勇，郭汉东.不同开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效比较[J].海南医学，2015，27（14）：2134-2136.
[14]	张朋，牛兆健，屈彬，等.探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].吉林医学，2014，35（19）：4203-4204.
[15]	王栓虎，姜从桥，傅军，等.腹腔镜疝修补与疝环充填式疝修补术的比较分析[J].中华全科医学，2013，11（3）：364.