|
|
|
| Clinical application of eugenic health education before pregnancy |
| HUANG Jin-xia DU Hong-mei ZHANG Lan |
| Yunfu People′s Hospital in Guangdong Province,Yunfu 527300,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of eugenic health education before pregnancy on eugenics of pregnant women.Methods From January 2015 to January 2017,1800 pregnant women who received pregnancy test and whose pregnancy outcomes were known in our hospital were selected as research objects.According to whether or not to accept the health education before pregnancy,the subjects were divided into the receiving health education group(group A,869 cases)and the not receiving health education group(group B,931 cases).A questionnaire survey was carried out to know the awareness rate of eugenic knowledge,the exposure of risk factors before pregnancy and during pregnancy.And the mode of delivery and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared.Results The awareness rate of eugenic knowledge in group A(95.51%)was higher than that in group B(89.04%),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The probabilities of pregnant woman or her husband smoking(including second-hand smoke)and drinking in group A(1.15%,0.00%)were lower than those in group B(6.98%,1.72%),the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the probabilities of receiving potential electric radiation for longer than 8 h,medication before pregnancy and genetic diseases(P＞0.05).The cesarean delivery rate(32.68%)and vaginal birth rate(0.00%)in group A were significantly lower than group B(42.21%,0.64%),the natural births(66.40%)was significantly higher than that in group B(55.96%),the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of medical abortion and major defect induced labor between the two groups of pregnant women (P＞0.05).The incidence of macrosomia,premature and the birth defects in group A (3.34%,1.15%and 0.46%)were significantly lower than group B(8.38%,2.58%and 1.50%),the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05),the incidence of low birth weight was compared between the two groups,and the difference was not statistically significant(P＞0.05).Conclusion Eugenic health education before pregnancy can improve the awareness of eugenic knowledge,change the bad habits of pregnant women,improve the delivery mode and reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Wang HJ，Kim IO.Effects of a mobile Web-based pregnancy health care educational program for mothers at an advanced maternal age[J].J Korean Acad Nurs，2015，45（3）：337-346.
|
| [2] |
窦迎春，方菁，杨瑶，等.云南某县农村居民对国家免费孕前优生健康检查的认知研究[J].现代预防医学，2016，43（21）：3932-3935.
|
| [3] |
袁彦玲，叶汉风，李宝鑫，等.孕前优生健康检查风险评估质量核查的定性研究[J].现代预防医学，2017，44（8）：1413-1416.
|
| [4] |
杨正春，冉素真，谭丽芳，等.胎儿畸形的临床分析[J].中国介入影像与治疗学，2016，13（10）：632-635.
|
| [5] |
张文秀，廖红林，李春燕.2378对农村计划怀孕夫妇孕前优生健康检查高风险因素分布情况分析[J].安徽医学，2015，36（2）：233-236.
|
| [6] |
余灵辉，李海燕，曹登成.围产儿出生缺陷及相关危险因素分析[J].医学临床研究，2016，33（7）：1307-1309.
|
| [7] |
蒋灵，张子榆.番禺区出生缺陷一级预防干预策略及生育风险评估体系建立研究[J].湖南师范大学学报（医学版），2014，11（2）：94-96.
|
| [8] |
黄勤瑾，陆勇.我国孕前保健服务发展现状与展望[J].中国健康教育，2014，30（9）：830-834.
|
| [9] |
万素馨，罗亚玲，周天津.我国出生缺陷影响因素的Meta分析[J].重庆医学，2015，44（14）：1939-1941.
|
| [10] |
邓松清，陈海天，王冬昱，等.二孩政策前后剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化[J].中华围产医学杂志，2017，20（1）：47-50.
|
| [11] |
谷丽静，谢胡飞.婚孕前健康教育对优生优育的影响观察[J].中国健康教育，2015，31（10）：992-994.
|
| [12] |
张静，刘兴会.再谈剖宫产术的绝对指征[J].实用妇产科杂志，2015，31（4）：250-251.
|
| [13] |
钱睿亚，陈政弘，汤丽荣，等.剖宫产术对产妇近远期影响的调查[J].中华妇产科杂志，2017，52（2）：116-119.
|
| [14] |
刘晓明.孕前优生检查[J].中国地方病防治杂志，2014，（S1）：82.
|
| [15] |
赵玉凤，谢炜，裴丹，等.连云港市病残儿童资料分析及孕前优生干预其父母再生育效果研究[J].中国工程科学，2015，17（6）：36-40.
|
|
|
|
