|
|
|
| Effect comparison of the diluent Propofol and high concentration Propofol on painless induced abortion |
| WANG Yong HE Chun-yan |
| Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Chongqing Nan′an District,Chongqing 400061,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To observe the efficacy,side effects and dosage of diluent Propofol(0.5%)and high concentration Propofol(1%)for painless induced abortion so as to discuss the superiority of the concentration of two narcotic drugs.Methods From August 2016 to July 2017,100 cases of early pregnancy women who voluntarily requested painless artificial abortion were randomly divided into diluted Propofol group (0.5%concentration,Propofol 200 mg/20 ml+normal saline 20 ml,referred to as the observation group).High concentration Propofol group (1%concentration,Propofol 200 mg/20 ml,no dilution,referred to as the control group),50 cases in each group,the anesthetic effect and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence of blood pressure decreased significantly,the incidence of heart rate decreased significantly in the operation,the incidence of oxygen saturation decreased significantly in the operation in the observation group were less than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(p＜0.05),the average dosage of Propofol in the observation group surgery was less than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05),the incidence of obvious injection pain when Propofol injection in the observation group surgery was less than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(p＜0.05),In the observation group,the time from the end of drug injection to the wake-up time and the time from the end of drug injection to the recovery of free walking were shorter than those in the control group （P＜0.05）.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions and operation time （P＜0.05).Conclusion Application of Propofol in painless induced abortion operations has the advantages of stable hemodynamics,low incidence of injection pain and respiratory depression,less Propofol dosage,and shorter recovery time,which can achieve an ideal anesthesia effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
严晓娥，张少玲.丙泊酚在人工流产手术麻醉中的应用[J].医学创新研究，2007，4（30）：118.
|
| [2] |
庄心良，曾因明，陈伯銮，等.现代麻醉学[M].3 版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2003：481
|
| [3] |
Picard P，Tramer MR.Prevention of pain on injection with propofol：a quantitative systemaitic review[J].Anesth Analg，2000，90（4）：963-969.
|
| [4] |
涂昕祥.预防丙泊酚注射痛的几种方法评估[J].河北医学，2010，16（7）：847-849.
|
| [5] |
欧珊，叶占勇，胡玲，等.异丙酚复合芬太尼或氯胺酮在无痛肠镜中的对比观察[J].局解手术学杂志，2003，12（4）：273-274.
|
| [6] |
Kam E，Abdul-Latif MS，McCluskey A.Comparison of Propofol-Lipuro with propofol mixed with lidocaine 10 mg on propofol injection pain[J].Anaesthesia，2004，59（12）：1167-1169.
|
| [7] |
罗云，楼纪萍，沙珊瑚，等.静脉预注利多卡因用于预防丙泊酚注射痛的临床观察[J].中国药物与临床，2010，10（5）：573-574.
|
| [8] |
杨斌.0.5%丙泊酚稀释液在儿童全麻诱导期注射痛的缓解作用[J].海峡药学，2010，22（2）：80-82.
|
| [9] |
车志新，廖荣宗，邓铭锋，等.小剂量舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚用于无痛人流的临床研究[J].现代医院，2017，17（3）：428-430.
|
| [10] |
王琛，王国林.丙泊酚注射痛的机制及预防[J].医学综述，2006，12（2）：107-108.
|
| [11] |
Minogue SC，Sun DA.Bacteriostatic saline containing benzyl alcohol decreases the pain associated with the injection of propofol[J].Anesth Analg，2005，100（3）：683-686.
|
| [12] |
陈琼辉.丙泊酚诱导时加入麻黄碱可有效防止血压下降及心率减慢[J].医学创新研究，2007，4（33）：49.
|
| [13] |
林晓玲，陈倩.阿托品在无痛人流术中的临床应用[J].西部医学，2006，18（5）：560-561.
|
| [14] |
罗水莲，邓洁梅，戚晓冬，等.阿托品配伍丙泊酚与芬太尼镇痛防治吸宫术中血压下降及术后腹痛的报告[J].实用疼痛学杂志，2011，7（5）：351-353.
|
| [15] |
董玉素，邵亮.丙泊酚伍用小剂量芬太尼用于无痛人工流产的临床观察[J].中国乡村医药杂志，2008，15（8）：42.
|
| [16] |
李玉玲.丙酚加芬太尼用于人工流产手术的麻醉观察[J].中华医学研究杂志，2004，4（4）：390.
|
| [17] |
谷梅梅.丙泊酚给药速度在无痛人工流产镇静应用中的效果观察与护理[J].吉林医学，2015，36（5）：3387-3388.
|
| [18] |
邹伟，陈海琳，张彩红，等.无痛术在人工流产手术中的应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2001，17（8）：504.
|
|
|
|
