剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者术后采用不同避孕方式的避孕效果差异

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (29 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the contraceptive efficacy and safety of compound short-acting oral contraceptives,levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system and condoms after cesarean scar pregnancy curettage.Methods From August 2014 to August 2016,121 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy were randomized into three groups.39 patients in the contraceptive pill group were treated with compound short-acting contraceptives,39 patients in mirena group were placed Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system)after curettage immediately,and 43 patients in condom group were given condoms contraception.Patients of three groups were followed up to compare ultrasonic examination results,unexpected pregnancy and menstrual flow change.Results Patients were followed up for 12 months.The total effective rates of patients in contraceptive pill group was 97.4%,there was 1 case of recurrent CSP in contraceptive pills group because of forget to take the pills.The total effective rates of patients in Mirena patient group was 100%.The total effective rates of patients in condoms contraception group was 91%.There was 4 pregnancy occurred,including 1 case of recurrent CSP and 3 case of intrauterine pregnancy.The total effective rates of patients in contraceptive pill group and Mirena patient group were significantly higher than patients in condoms contraception group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Ultrasonic examination showed there were no incision rupture or damage and no complaints about asexual life in the 3 groups.There was no increase in the amount of menstruation in the three groups and the decrease of menstruation in the patients of Mirena group was significantly higher than that of the condom group and the contraceptive pill group at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively,with significant difference (P＜0.05).ConclusionAfter uterine artery embolization combined with uterine curettage cesarean scar pregnancy patients can take marvelon and Mirena intrauterine contraception,which is safe,reliable,and can benefit patients more,and is better than only using condoms.

Key words： Cesarean scarpregnancy Curettage Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system Compound short-acting contraceptives Safe period Condom Contraception

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Cai-hong
	LI Yong-da

Cite this article:

YANG Cai-hong,LI Yong-da. A comparative contraceptive effect among different contraceptive actions after cesarean scar pregnancy curettage[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(1): 92-94.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I1/92

[1]	尹封云.剖宫产后子宫疤痕妊娠三种不同避孕方式避孕效果研究[J].现代诊断与治疗，2017，28（12）:2326-2327.
[2]	杨鹃，杨永华.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的临床观察[J].中国医药科学，2015，5（2）：61-63.
[3]	施腾飞，童晓文.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断与治疗进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志，2014，41（1）：80.
[4]	陈雁鸣，冯颖，李长东，等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术后避孕方式的临床效果观察[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2016，24（4）：279-280.
[5]	李亚玲.痕子宫避孕与终止妊娠新方法和避孕与意外妊娠相关性研究[J].中国当代医药，2009,16（20）:7-10.
[6]	万金华，朱艳琼.复方短效口服避孕药、左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统和安全套在剖瘢痕妊娠清宫术后的避孕效果比较[J].安徽医药，2016，20（10）：1949-1952.
[7]	王文蓉，虞丰，华金凤等.复方短效口服避孕药在人工流产后的应用价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2011，19（5）：291-293.
[8]	黄凌云.人工流产术后即时与正常经期放置曼月乐的避孕效果比较[J].山东医药，2014，54（12）：66-67.
[9]	程利南.人工流产后的避孕指导与服务[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2008，16（2）：126-128.
[10]	何淑明，韦明秀，韩燕华，等.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫腺肌病的临床观察[J].中华妇产科杂志，2005，40（8）：536-538.
[11]	王海玲，寇新华.中西药提高剖宫产术后再次足月妊娠阴道分娩成功率的临床观察[J].西部中医药，2015，29（5）：118-120.
[12]	潘峰，熊斌，梁惠民，等.双侧子宫动脉化疗栓塞术治疗剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健，2012，27（21）：3339-3342.
[13]	胡文娟.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的临床效果及安全性研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志，2016，24（12）：76-77.
[14]	王乔，彭鸿灵，何镭，等.介入治疗联合清宫术治疗123例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效评价及临床研究[J].实用妇产科杂志，2015，31（5）：372-375.
[15]	吴晓婷，步仰高.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠的研究现状和进展[J].安徽医学，2015，36（8）：1040-1043.