肘前肱动脉与正中神经入路治疗尺骨冠状突骨折的临床效果分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (30 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of antecubital brachial artery and median nerve approach in the treatment of patients with ulna coracoid process fracture.Methods 42 patients with ulna coracoid process fracture treated in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2017 were enrolled as research objects.According to the random number table method,they were evenly divided into the control group(21 cases)and the observation group(21 cases).The control group was treated medial approach,and the observation group was treated with antecubital brachial artery and median nerve approach.The therapeutic effectiveness rate,operation time,intraoperative amount of bleeding,postoperative volume of drainage,healing time of bone fracture,and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The therapeutic effectiveness rate in the observation group was 95.23%,which was higher than that in the control group accounting for 71.43%,with a statistical difference(P＜0.05).The indexes of operation time,healing time of bone fracture in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,intraoperative amount of bleeding,postoperative volume of drainage in the observation group was less than that in the control group,with statistical differences(P＜0.05).The incidence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was 4.76%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group accounting for 28.57%,which was displayed a statistical difference(P＜0.05).Conclusion For patients with ulna coracoid process fractures,application of antecubital brachial artery and median nerve approach can obtain a remarkable effect by greatly increasing the cure rate and reducing the clinical adverse reaction,which is worthy of promotion.

Key words： Ulna coracoid process fracture Antecubital brachial artery and median nerve approach Therapeutic effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Xian-fang
	LIU Zhang-sheng
	LIU Chuan-lin

Cite this article:

WANG Xian-fang,LIU Zhang-sheng,LIU Chuan-lin. Clinical effect analysis of antecubital brachial artery and median nerve approach in the treatment of ulna coracoid process fracture[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(1): 67-69.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I1/67

[1]	汪阳，张卫国，蒋林.微型解剖锁定钢板内固定与假体置换治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2014，16（6）：544-546.
[2]	杜俊锋，朱仰义.前内侧入路结合外侧入路内固定治疗肘关节三联征[J].中国骨伤，2014，27（11）：896-899.
[3]	刘仁浩，毕郑刚.肘部损伤“三联征”的最新认识和治疗进展[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2014，16（1）：72-75.
[4]	徐建，孙晟轩，李成，等.经肘关节前侧入路治疗尺骨冠状突前内侧面骨折疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2014，28（7）：806-809.
[5]	蒲博强，黄友华，杨能.开复位内固定治疗成人肱骨小头骨折伴或不伴后髁骨折效果比较[J].海南医学，2015，26（9）：1279-1281.
[6]	周渊，黄涛，廖晓辉，等.内固定辅助铰链式外固定支架治疗肘部损伤“三联征”的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2014，16（4）：359-361.
[7]	孙克富，耿玉强，崔建国，等.微型钢板结合Herbert螺钉治疗MasonⅢ型桡骨小头骨折[J].中华手外科杂志，2014，30（2）：153-155.
[8]	Han SH，Yoon HK，Rhee SY，et al.Anterior approach for fixation of isolated typeⅢcoronoid process fracture[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol，2013，23（4）：395-405.
[9]	ReichelLM，Milam GS，Reitman CA.Anterior approach for operative fixation of coronoid fractures in complex elbow instability[J].Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg，2012，16（2）：98-104.
[10]	张川，张作君，赵明，等.肘前内侧切口入路手术治疗尺骨冠状突前内侧面骨折[J].中国骨伤，2013，26（2）：111-114.
[11]	黄洪斌，季向荣，范顺武，等.前内侧面尺骨冠状突的手术治疗策略[J].中国骨伤，2013，26（2）：158-161.
[12]	Wang X，Chang SM，Yu GR.Anteromedial coronoid facet fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol，2013，23（3）：251-255.
[13]	王亦璁，姜保国.骨与关节损伤[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2012：884.
[14]	SinghA，AdamsAL，BurchetteR，etal.Theeffectofosteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg，2015，24（2）：191-198.
[15]	刘玥，李胜，邹文远，等.CR与CT对尺骨冠状突骨折应用价值比较[J].医学影像学杂志，2014，24（11）：1988-1992.