|
|
|
| Influence of personalized delivery model on delivery outcome in primipara |
| LI Li-ting XIAO Jin-hong HE Xiu-ling |
| Department of Obstetrics,Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510010,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the influence of personalized delivery model on delivery outcome in primipara. Methods From October 2012 to December 2014,200 full-termprimiparae to infanticipate received by our hospital were selected as research group.They were evenly divided into two groups using the random number table method.In control group,traditionaldelivery model for delivery was used.Primiparae were sent to delivery room for nursing midwifery when their cervix opened to 3 cm.In observation group,personalized delivery model namely accompany responsibility midwifery model in the whole delivery was used for midwifery.To be specific,on admission to hospital,primipara was accompanied by one senile and one standby midwife in the whole delivery including antenatal delivery guidance,accompanied labor during delivery,and breast feeding guidance after delivery.The duration of labor,the incidence rate of cesarean section,fetal distress in uterus,postpartum depression for puerpera,and Apgar score in neonate between two groups was compared respectively. Results In observation group,time of the first stage and second stage was shorter than that of control group respectively,ans postpartum hemorrhage amount was less than that in control group,the incidence rate of cesarean section,fetal distress in uterus,postpartum depression for puerpera was lower than that of control group respectively,and there was a statistical difference（P＜0.05）. Conclusion Personalized delivery model can effectively shorten stage of labor in primiparae,and reduce the incidences of cesarean section,fetal distress in uterus,and postpartum depression for puerpera,reduce postpartum hemorrhage amount,and improve neonatal Apgar score,which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
胡双英.全程陪伴责任助产模式与传统服务模式的临床观察[J].临床合理用药杂志，2012，5（9A）：30-31.
|
| [2] |
Howarth AM，Swain NR，Treharne GJ.First-time mothers′perspective on relationships with and between midwives and doctors：insights from a qualitative study of giving birth in New Zealand[J].Midwifery，2012，28（4）：489-494.
|
| [3] |
冯新文．导乐陪伴式分娩和家庭式分娩的护理体会[J]．山西医药杂志（下半月刊），2009，38（1）：143-144．
|
| [4] |
Bener A，Burgut FT，Ghuloum S，et al.A study of postpartum depression in a fast developing country：prevalence and related factors[J].Int J Psychiatry Med，2012，43（4）：325-337.
|
| [5] |
王合丽.“一对一”全程陪护分娩助产模式对妊娠结局的影响分析[J].中国伤残医学，2013，21（9）：340-341.
|
| [6] |
李兰兰，唐华贵，黄春芳.个性化心理护理对产妇分娩结局的影响[J].南华大学学报，2008，36（2）；269-270.
|
| [7] |
Shahoei R，Riji HM，Saeedi ZA.'Safe passage'：pregnant Irinaian Kurdish women′s choice of childbirth method[J].J Adv Nurs，2011，67（10）：2130-2138.
|
| [8] |
顾春怡，武晓丹，张铮，等.助产服务模式的实践研究现状[J].中华护理杂志，2011，46（4）：413-415.
|
| [9] |
Schroll AM，Tabor A，Kjiaergaard H.Physical and sexual lifetime violence：prevalence and influence on fear of childbirth before，during and after delivery[J].J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol，2011，32（1）：19-26.
|
| [10] |
张敏，刘元欣.不同护理干预对孕妇分娩结局的影响[J].山东医药，2012，32（3）：46-49.
|
| [11] |
吕春华，熊玉贤.连续性个性化助产模式对初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].护士进修杂志，2014，29（7）：643-644.
|
| [12] |
李贤芬，苗云，陈稀.孕期焦虑与抑郁情绪调查及相关危险因素分析[J].齐鲁医学杂志，2012，25（3）：228-231.
|
| [13] |
雷罗娇，刘庆元，陈锦.不同护理干预对孕妇分娩结局的影响[J].当代护士，2012，（2）：46-48.
|
| [14] |
赵梦媛，周艳，扬甜甜.助产士主导模式在产后抑郁干预中的应用现状[J].护士进修杂志，2013，28（9）：825-827.
|
| [15] |
黄建辉.改良自然分娩模式对初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2014，20（14）：11-13.
|
|
|
|
