|
|
Application effect of propofol combined with fentanyl in painless artificial abortion |
LI Xin-an1 TANG Wen-chang1 ZENG Xian-rong1 ZHANG Jia-qun1 ZOU Su-jiao2 |
1.Department of Anesthesio1ogy,Shiyan Peop1e’s Hospita1 of Baoan District in Shenzhen City,Shenzhen 518108,China;
2.Operation Room,Peop1e’s Hospita1 of Luohu District in Shenzhen City,Shenzhen 518001,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the best combination scheme of propofo1 combined with fentany1 app1ied in anaesthesia of pain1ess artificia1 abortion. Methods 200 patients with ASA gradeⅠ-Ⅱconducted pain1ess artificia1 abortion and treated by our hospita1 from May 2014 to August 2015 were se1ected and they were random1y divided into four groups, and there were 50 cases in each group. Anaesthesia of pain1ess artificia1 abortion was conducted with propofo1 combining with 0.05 μg/kg (group A),0.1 μg/kg (group B), 0.15 μg/kg (group C) of fentany1,and group D was given simp1e propofo1 to conduct anaesthesia.MAP,HR and SpO2 was observed respective1y,whi1e additiona1 dose of propofo1, ana1gesic effect during operation,awake time,postoperative uterine contraction pain and incidence rate of adverse reaction such as intraoperative awareness,fantasy,nausea,vomiting and so on was recorded respective1y. Results Ana1gesic effect of group A,B and C was better than that of group D (P<0.05),and ana1gesic effect of group B and C was better than that of group A (P<0.05).Compared with before operation,MAP,HR,SpO2during operation in group A and B was decreased s1ight1y,but there was no statistica1 difference (P>0.05),and MAP in group C had no obvious change during operation (P>0.05),HR,SpO2was significant1y decreased respective1y (P<0.05);MAP,HR,SpO2during operation in group D was significant1y decreased (P<0.01).There was no statistica1 difference of MAP,HR,SpO2before operation among 4 groups (P>0.05),and there was a statistica1 difference of MAP,HR,SpO2during operation in group A,B and C compared with group D respective1y (P<0.05).Additiona1 dose of propofo1 in group B and C was significant1y fewer than that of group A (P<0.05),and there was no statistica1 difference between group B and C (P>0.05);awake time in group B an C was significant1y shorter than that in group A (P<0.05),and there was no statistica1 difference between group B and C (P>0.05).Compared with group D,additiona1 dose of propofo1 was fewer and awake time was shorter in group A,B and C, but there was no statistica1 difference (P>0.05).There was a statistica1 difference of incidence rate of uterine contraction pain after operation in group A,B and C compared with group D P<0.05).There was no statistica1 difference of incidence rate of comp1ication among 4 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Anesthesia effect is exact of propofo1 combining with 0.1 μg/kg of fentany1 for pain1ess artificia1 abortion,and it is safe with fewer comp1ications.It is worthy of c1inica1 promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
邓立强.舒芬太尼在手术后静脉自控镇痛中的观察[J].中国医学创新,2011,8(2):40-41.
|
[2] |
王锋,张雪芹.丙泊酚复合芬太尼、舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼用于无痛人流的对比观察[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2010,32(6):401-403.
|
[3] |
罗云勇,向勇,杨天德,等.舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚在无痛人工流产中的应用[J].重庆医学,2011,40(32):3260-3262.
|
[4] |
黄丽霞,纪浩聪,高晓枫.丙泊酚复合小剂量氯胺酮用于无痛人流的效果观察[J].河南职业医学院学报,2006,18 (1):20-21.
|
[5] |
秦学斌,蔡新新,张文斌,等.丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼对术后神志清楚机械通气重症患者器官功能的保护作用[J].中国临床医学,2014,21(2):189-191.
|
[6] |
李水英,周红梅,崔秀联.依托咪酯复合丙泊酚在门诊无痛人流术中的临床观察[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(10):65-67.
|
[7] |
邹继杰,杨剑.小剂量氯胺酮复合丙泊酚靶控输注用于人工流产术的临床观察[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(20):114-117.
|
[8] |
李惟一,范灵云,耿桂启,等.气管导管不同套囊压力对全身麻醉气管插管时心血管反应的影响[J].中国临床医学,2015,22(2):192-194.
|
[9] |
陈颂英.舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于无痛人流的临床观察[J].河北医学,2012,18(7):916-918.
|
[10] |
李文斌,吉桠楠.丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼用于无痛人流的麻醉效果观察[J].西部医学,2009,21(7):1147-1148.
|
[11] |
陈燃.舒芬太尼与芬太尼辅助丙泊酚在无痛人流手术中的应用观察[J].安徽医药,2010,14(8):957-958.
|
[12] |
管忍,李伟彦,林宁,等.丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼用于门诊无痛人工流产的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(10):709-710.
|
[13] |
李建桥,陈伟,文竹,等.舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚用于无痛人流麻醉的疗效[J].中国药师,2009,12(7):948-949.
|
[14] |
李波,周仁龙,张马忠,等.丙泊酚和舒芬太尼相互作用的反应曲面模型构建[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2010,(26):1023-1025.
|
[15] |
赵光玲.丙泊酚配伍芬太尼静脉麻醉用于无痛人流的临床分析[J].当代医学,2012,18(5):14-15.
|
|
|
|