不同人工诱导方法产生龙血竭的镇痛、抗炎效果的比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (21)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (45 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To make an investigation on the comparison of analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of Resina Draconis generated by different artificial induction methods.Methods The experimental data was derived from the laboratory of pharmaceutical factory of Guangxi University of TCM，which was collected in December 2015.The writhing test method was adopted in the analgesic test that recruited and divided 80 mice into 8 groups randomly and evenly with 10 mice in each group，including Saline Group，Aspirin Group　（0.5 g/kg），Large-Dosage Natural Group and Small-Dosage Natural Group（naturally-produced Resina Draconis with small dosage and with large dosage，1 g/kg and 2 g/kg），Large-Dosage Biological Group and Small-Dosage Biological Group　（biological-induction-produced Resina Draconis with small dosage and with large dosage，1 g/kg and 2 g/kg），Large-Dosage Chemical Group and Small-Dosage Chemical Group（chemicalinduction-produced　Resina　Draconis　with　small dosage and with large dosage，1 g/kg and 2 g/kg）.The drug was administered orally to mice in each group atthe dose of 0.1 ml/10 g，1 time a day，for 3 consecutive days，the effect of each drug on chemically-stimulated pain reactions（the number of writhing times，writhing latency and the inhibition rate）were observed.As for the anti-inflammatory test，50 mice were recruited and divided into 5 groups randomly and evenly with 10 mice in each group，including Control Group　（administered with the same volume of distilled water），Aspirin Positive Control Group　（0.2 g/kg），Natural Group（naturally-produced Resina Draconis，2 g/kg），Biological Group（biological-induction-produced Resina Draconis，2 g/kg）and Chemical Group　（chemical-induction-produced Resina Draconis，2 g/kg）.The drugs were continuously and intragastrically administered to all the mice one time a day，for 7 days.The right ears of all the mice were coated with 20 μl xylene 1 hour after the last administration to make all the mice′s right ears swelling.All the mice were killed 1 hour later and their ears were cut off.Then，the ear flaps were cut off with a 6 mm punch and weighed to calculate the weight gaps between the right ear and the left ear and observe the anti-inflammatory effect（the swelling degree of ears）.Results According to the writhing test results，the number of writhing times in Large-Dosage Natural Group and Small-Dosage Natural Group，Large-Dosage Biological Group and Small-Dosage Biological Group，Large-Dosage Chemical Group and Small-Dosage Chemical Group as well as Aspirin Group were（9.01±6.87），（10.05±7.87），（10.51±6.37），（11.05± 7.57），（10.39±7.35），（10.15±7.12），（10.00±4.57）times versus Saline Group′s of（21.10±10.62）times，which showed obvious inhibitory effects on the number of writhing times（P＜0.01）in all the groups except Saline Group.Large-Dosage Natural Group，Small-Dosage Natural Group，Large-Dosage Biological Group，Small-Dosage Biological Group，Large-Dosage Chemical Group and Small-Dosage Chemical Group demonstrated similarities with Aspirin Group in the analgesic effects（P＞0.05）.No significant difference was seen between the writhing frequency of Large-Dosage Natural Group，Small-Dosage Natural Group，Large-Dosage Biological Group，Small-Dosage Biological Group，Large-Dosage Chemical Group and Small-Dosage Chemical Group　（P＞0.05）.As for the anti-inflammatory experiment，the swelling degree of ears in Natural Group，Biological Group，Chemical Group，Aspirin Positive Control Group and Control Group were（7.8±2.3），（7.3± 2.6），（7.5±2.8），（7.0±2.2），（11.2±2.4）mg respectively，with the existence of significant difference between Control Group and the other four groups（P＜0.05）.There was no significant difference between the anti-inflammatory effect of Natural Group，Biological Group and Chemical Group　（P＞0.05）.Conclusion Resina Draconis generated by different artificial induction methods proves itself with no significant difference in anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects.

Key words： Artificial-induction-produced resina draconis Analgesia Anti-inflammatory

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LUO Yu-dong
	WU Yu-qiang
	LI Ping
	TAN An-qiang
	ZHANG Qiang

Cite this article:

LUO Yu-dong,WU Yu-qiang,LI Ping, et al. ComParison of analgesic and anti-Inflammatory effect of Resina Draconis generated by different artificial induction methods[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(15): 87-90.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2016/V23/I15/87

［1］	蔡希陶，许再富.国产血竭植物资源的研究［J］.云南植物研究，1979，1（2）：1-9.
［2］	徐曾涛.龙血竭化学成分的研究现状［J］.北方药学，2015，12（1）：105-106.
［3］	高源，普德兵，李蓉涛，等.龙血竭形成过程中甾体皂苷成分的变化［J］.云南中医中药杂志，2014，35（6）：75-77.
［4］	曹广军，张静泽，胡迎庆，等.不同工艺提取龙血竭的抗炎镇痛止血作用的比较［J］.天津药学，2005，17（3）：3-4.
［5］	江东福，马萍，杨靖，等.9568D镰孢霉作用于死态龙血树形成血脂的研究［J］.应用生态学报，2003，14（3）：477-478.
［6］	杨靖，江东福，马萍.特异性真菌作用于龙血树材质形成血竭的研究［J］.中草药，2003，35（5）：572-574.
［7］	王云.剑叶龙血树叶源血竭的诱导研究［D］.昆明：云南大学，2010.
［8］	郑水.血竭诱导机制及几种龙血树分子分类的初步研究［D］.昆明：云南大学，2013.
［9］	陈奇.中药药理研究方法学［M］.2版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2006：244.
［10］	农毅清，蒋林，吴玉强，等.常春卫矛与爬行卫矛的镇痛抗炎作用及急性毒性研究［J］.时珍国医国药，2012，23 （6）：1384-1385.
［11］	周智，韦奇志，吴植强，等.扶芳藤一般药理及急性毒性研究［J］.中国药师，2011，14（8）：1115-1117.
［12］	苏秀芳，梁振益.珍稀濒危植物剑叶龙血树茎挥发油的化学成分测定［J］.广东农业科学，2010，11（1）：177-181.
［13］	樊兰兰，屠鹏飞，何鉴星，等.中药龙血竭原植物剑叶龙血树的形态组织学研究及所含树脂的分布和成分检测［J］.中国中药杂志，2008，33（10）：1112-1116.
［14］	陈定芳，宋启示.剑叶龙血树根、茎、叶中血竭成分分析［J］.中草药，2005，36（10）：1545-1547.
［15］	李云，萧伟，秦建平，等.HPLC同时测定龙血竭及其提取物中5个有效成分的含量［J］.中国中药杂志，2012，37（4）：929-933.
［16］	周艳林，闵建国，邹准，等.HPLC-DPPH评价剑叶龙血树中抗氧化活性成分及构效关系［J］.中草药，2015，46 （12）：1797-1799.
［17］	广西壮族自治区食品药品管理局.广西壮族自治区壮药质量标准［M］.南宁：广西科学技术出版社，2008.
［18］	闵建国，周艳林，邹准，等.HPLC法测定壮药剑叶龙血树中7-羟基-4′-甲氧基黄烷和紫檀茋［J］.中草药，2013，44（17）：2471-2473.
［19］	滕建北，朱华，蔡毅，等.剑叶龙血树的过氧化物酶活性与树脂产生关系初探［J］.中国民族民间医药，2008，7（1）：20-22.
［20］	王芳芳，胡琳，李正涛，等.剑叶龙血树树叶化学成分及其改善HepG-2细胞胰岛素抵抗的作用［J］.云南民族大学学报（自然科学版），2015，24（5）：349-353.
［21］	李成，宋启示.剑叶龙血树叶化学成分研究［J］.中草药，2008，39（10）：1456-1457.