绳梯法与区域法穿刺方法对自体动静脉内瘘功能状态的影响对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (25 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo study the application value of rope ladder and area puncture on the influence of the functional status of autologous arteriovenous fistula.MethodsFrom June 2015 to April 2017,96 hemodialysis patients with new internal fistula surgery were selected as research objects in our hospital.By a random number table method,they were evenly divided into research group and control group,48 cases in each group.In the research group,rope ladder was used,while in the control group,area puncture was adopted.The puncture effect of the two methods was compared.ResultsBy observing the puncture effect,the success rate of puncture and incidence of insufficiency of blood flow volume and subcutaneous hematoma were not displayed great differences(χ2=0.721,0.438,2.178,P＞0.05),but the errhysis incidence was lower in the research group (χ2=5.350,P<0.05).In the research group,the incidence of complications was 4.17%,significantly lower than that in the control group accounting for 16.67%(χ2=8.370,P<0.05).The satisfaction in the research group was 97.92%,higher than that of the control group,83.33%,with a statistical difference (χ2=12.527,P<0.05).ConclusionFor hemodialysis patients with new fistula surgery,both rope ladder and area puncture have certain application value,but few complications,high safety,and a good doctor-patient relationship maintained after rope ladder puncturing.

Key words： Arteriovenous fistula Area puncture Hemodialysis Rope ladder

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Qiao-rong
	LIU Li
	ZHANG Jin-lian

Cite this article:

ZHANG Qiao-rong,LIU Li,ZHANG Jin-lian. Comparison of rope ladder and area puncture on the influence of the functional status of autologous arteriovenous fistula[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(5): 188-190.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I5/188

[2]	潘艳萍.绳梯穿刺法对动静脉内瘘并发症的影响[J].当代医学，2016，22（36）:44-45.
[3]	管菊梅.新成熟动静脉内瘘不同穿刺方法对内瘘并发症的影响分析[J].中国伤残医学，2015，23（20）：160-161.
[5]	殷金梅，陈彦茹，李康来，等.不同穿刺法对血液透析病人动静脉内瘘的影响[J].护理研究，2014，28（3）：321-322.
[6]	周建芳，叶晓敏，黄春香，等.自体动静脉内瘘扣眼穿刺感染的分析及预防[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2017，27（7）：1659-1662.
[1]	Flores-Jimenez JA，Gutierrez-Aguirre CH，Graciela Cantu-Rodriguez OG，et al.Safety and cost-effectiveness of a simplified method for lumbar puncture in patients with hematologic malignancies[J].Acta Haematol，2015，133 （2）：168-171.
[4]	Georgianos PI，Sarafidis PA，Karpetas A，et al.Hemodiafiltration does not have additional benefits over hemodialysis on arterial stiffness，wave reflections and central aortic pressures[J].Blood Purif，2014，37（1）：18-26.
[7]	谭舒月.对比不同穿刺法对血液透析患者动静脉内瘘的影响[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2017，2（17）：174，177.
[8]	杨群，吉小静，戴欢欢，等.两种穿刺法在自体动静脉内瘘患者中的效果比较[J].护理实践与研究，2016，13（23）：114-116.
[9]	郑淑娟，黄秀碧，简小兰，等.开展钝针扣眼穿刺动静脉内瘘在血液透析中保护内瘘的效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理，2016，7（18）：49-52.
[10]	杨雪群，梁业梅，钟秋，等.绳梯扣眼法应用于动静脉内瘘穿刺口止血效果的观察[J].护理研究，2014，28（4）：449-450.
[11]	陈林，曹晓翼，石梅，等.两种穿刺法在血液透析动静脉内瘘中的应用[J].护理研究，2016，30（8）：967-969.
[12]	石梅，陈林，曹晓翼，等.2种不同穿刺法对血液透析患者动静脉内瘘的临床效果研究[J].检验医学与临床，2016，13（3）：410-411.
[13]	梁云芳，黄家莲，黄华，等.自体动静脉内瘘血栓形成溶栓治疗应用不同穿刺方式的效果比较[J].现代医院，2017，17（6）：925-927.
[14]	程静，陶玲玲.2种穿刺方法在维持性血液透析患者动静脉内瘘中的应用[J].实用临床医学，2016，17（9）：78-79.
[15]	Jang J，Schmitt P，Kim BY，et al.Non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography with STAR spin labeling and variable flip angle sampling：A feasibility study for the assessment of dural arteriovenous fistula[J].Neuroradiology，2014，56（4）：305-314.
[16]	常天颖，王芳杰，单岩，等.两种动静脉内瘘穿刺方法对血液透析患者影响的Meta分析[J].护士进修杂志，2017，32（9）：788-792.