BI-RADS超声与乳腺X线摄影联合检查在诊断乳腺原位癌中的价值分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (37 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the value of BI-RADS ultrasound combined with mammography in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma in situ.Methods From October 2013 to September 2016,78 female patients with breast cancer in situ confirmed by biopsy in People′s Hospital of Qingxin District of Qingyuan City and the Third Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University were proved by pathology were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were examined by BI-RADS ultrasonography and mammography before biopsy,and compared with the pathological biopsy results,the detection rate,misdiagnosis rate and sensitivity in the diagnosis of breast cancer by using BI-RADS (ultrasound examination),mammography alone(X-ray examination)and the combination of both were compared.Results The detection rate of combined examination(94.94%)was higher than that of BI-RADS ultrasonography(87.17%)and mammography (76.92%),with significant difference (P＜0.05).The detection rate of BI-RADS ultrasonography was higher than that of mammography,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The total sensitivity of BI-RADS was 87.17%,which was higher than that of mammography(76.92%),with significant difference(P＜0.05).Among them,the diagnostic sensitivity of the grade 4 in BI-RADS was significantly higher than that of mammography,with significant difference(P＜0.05).But there was no significant difference in the diagnosis sensitivity of grade 5 andⅤdiagnosis between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion BIRADS ultrasound combined with mammography has higher detection rat and higher sensitivity in diagnosis of breast carcinoma in situ,which is worth to promoting.

Key words： BI-RADS ultrasound Mammography Breast carcinoma in situ Combination

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JIANG Gui-qiong
	LIANG Wei-xiang

Cite this article:

JIANG Gui-qiong,LIANG Wei-xiang. Value analysis of BI-RADS ultrasound combined with mammography in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma in situ[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(9): 92-94.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2017/V24/I9/92

[8]	孙琨，严福华，陈克敏，等.乳腺小叶原位癌的X线和超声及MRI表现[J].放射学实践，2014，29（10）：1120-1122.
[1]	尤超，顾雅佳，彭卫军，等.MRI鉴别乳腺导管原位癌与其他导管内病变的价值[J].中国癌症杂志，2014，24（6）：463-468.
[2]	秘子涵，任建松，张洪召，等.2012～2013年中国城市人群乳腺癌筛查结果分析[J].中华预防医学杂志，2016，50（10）：887-892.
[3]	梁晓燕，许建林，黄颖，等.早期乳腺癌的X线摄影与超声诊断价值[J].现代肿瘤医学，2015，23（16）：2374-2377.
[4]	朱长雨，顾梅，赵京阳，等.触诊超声及钼靶检查在乳腺原位癌早期诊断中的应用[J].浙江临床医学，2016，18（10）：1905-1906.
[5]	张秉宜，张郁林，韩玲，等.高频彩超及X线钼靶检查对乳腺原位癌早期诊断价值的对照分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志，2015，26（1）：14-17.
[6]	夏元福.磁共振、钼靶及高频彩超在乳腺导管原位癌中的诊断价值[J].中国医药导报，2016，13（13）：113-116.
[7]	李二妮，周纯武，李静，等.BI-RADS系统在乳腺X线摄影及超声诊断中的应用[J].放射学实践，2013，28（6）：651-654.
[9]	王一澎，郭文青，张丽华，等.从原位癌到微小浸润：乳腺肿瘤的临床病理分析及对外科治疗的影响[J].癌症进展，2016，14（5）：423-428.
[10]	刘奕琳，刘洪杰，刘丽，等.乳腺X线和超声检查对乳腺导管原位癌术前病变范围评估的对比研究[J].实用放射学杂志，2015，31（9）：1443-1446.
[11]	宋会明，郑媛媛，金燕燕，等.BI-RADS超声联合乳腺X线摄影分级诊断乳腺原位癌的临床应用价值[J].医学影像学杂志，2016，26（4）：734-736.
[12]	李卓琳，吴建萍，李鹍，等.乳腺BI-RADS分类在临床不可触及病变中的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志，2014，30 （12）：1982-1985.
[13]	李伟伟，陈曼，郑雯，等.乳腺导管原位癌的超声弹性成像研究[J].中国超声医学杂志，2014，30（7）：595-598.
[14]	洪常华，韩德昌，杨新宇，等.乳腺MRI与乳腺X线诊断导管原位癌的临床效果[J].中国老年学杂志，2015，35（2）：376-377.
[15]	连臻强，张嫣，王颀，等.乳腺X线和磁共振诊断导管原位癌及其微浸润的对比研究[J].中华普通外科杂志，2014，29（5）：351-354.