|
|
Meta analysis of Kangai Injection combined with FOLFIRI for the treatment of colorectal cancer |
ZHANG Li-na1 WANG Yuan-yuan2 QIU Chao-ping1 SU Ting1 YE Hui1 SHI Xian-fang1▲ |
1.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,the Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510655,China;
2.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Whampoa District of the First Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510000,China |
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo discuss and systematically evaluate the clinical effect and safety of Kangai Injection combined with FOLFIRI for the treatment of colorectal cancer.MethodsPubmed,the Cochrane Library,SCI,CNKI,VIP,CBM,Wan Fang Database were searched using computer.August 10,2016 was search deadline.Clinical randomized controlled study of Kangai Injection combined with FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan applied in colorectal cancer was collected,and the effective rate,the improvement rate of quality of life and adverse reaction related data among the studies were added and combined.Differences of curative effect of two drug combination group and single FOLFIRI group were compared and analyzed.According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,two researchers independently selected and searched the literature,extracted the data and Meta analysis was conducted using Revman 5.0 software.ResultsA total of 4 studies were included involving 299 patients.Meta analysis results showed that there was a statistical difference of the effective rate between the Kangai Injection combined with FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan (the combined group)and single FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan group after treatment(P<0.01;OR=1.82,95%CI=1.16-2.87).There was a statistical difference of the improvement rate of quality of life between the combined group and single FOLFIRI plan (P<0.01;OR=2.32,95%CI=1.33-4.07).The incidence rate of white blood cell reduction in the combination group was statistically significant lower than that of the single FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan group,and there was a statistical difference(P<0.01;OR=51.46,95%CI=10.36-255.67).Theincidence rate of nausea and vomiting in the combination group was statistically significant lower than that of the FOLFIRI chemotherapy group and there was a statistical difference(P<0.01;OR=0.33,95%CI=0.15-0.73).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the aspects of platelet reduction,liver and renal function damage and diarrhea (P>0.05).ConclusionKangai Injection combined with FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan is better than single FOLFIRI chemotherapy plan in the aspects of effect for treating advanced colorectal cancer and reducing the adverse reaction.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
徐匹夫.奥沙利铂联合化疗治疗结肠癌的疗效分析[J].医学综述,2014,20(10):1883-1884.
|
[2] |
康清杰.结肠癌筛查和诊疗的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2015,44(28):4001-4003.
|
[3] |
徐瑞华,邱妙珍.晚期结直肠癌化疗的研究进展[J].癌症,2008,27(6):661-666.
|
[4] |
赖景春,彭卫卫,邓江华,等.参芪扶正注射液联合化疗对恶性肿瘤的增效减毒作用[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33 (24):6285-6286.
|
[5] |
豆利华.康艾注射液在晚期胰腺癌患者化疗中的增效减毒作用[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(1):140-141.
|
[6] |
贾玉萍,周东顺,孙超,等.人参多糖对环磷酰胺的增效减毒作用[J].中国实验动物学报,2013,21(6):61-64.
|
[7] |
冯巧巧,刘军田,马玉奎.毛蚶提取物对环磷酰胺增效减毒作用的研究[J].生物医学工程研究,2015,34(1):54-57.
|
[8] |
张玉荣,王素美,赵亮,等.用中医增效减毒综合疗法治疗急性白血病的效果研究[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(16):50-51.
|
[9] |
吴松,赖海标,钟喨,等.扶正固本方在晚期前列腺癌化疗中增效减毒的作用机制及氧传感器PHD2蛋白的相关性研究[J].亚太传统医药,2015,11(17):15.
|
[10] |
门可,李良寿.循证医学(三)-Meta分析[J].疑难病杂志,2005,4(1):58-61.
|
[11] |
马利,沈绍武.Meta分析在中医药循证医学中的应用[J].湖北中医学院学报,2008,10(3):68-69.
|
[12] |
陈长生,徐勇勇.第十四讲如何进行meta分析[J].中华预防医学杂志,2003,37(2):138-140.
|
[13] |
詹思延.正确使用和合理解读Meta分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2009,47(12):883-886.
|
[14] |
詹思延.如何做一个好的系统综述和Meta分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2010,42(6):644-647.
|
[16] |
蒋琴,祝红.康艾注射液联合FORFIRI化疗方案治疗晚期结肠癌30临床分析[J].昆明医学院学报,2011,32(9):52-53.
|
[17] |
蔡德珺,蒋晓松,林高.90例康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期结肠癌的有效性[J].北方药学,2015,12(8):184.
|
[18] |
李康.康艾注射液联合化疗治疗晚期结肠癌临床疗效研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2014,16(11):19-21.
|
[19] |
陈旭兰,黄景东,杨清蓉.康艾注射液配合化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌[J].光明中医,2008,23(11):1745-1747.
|
[15] |
Auperin A,Le Pechoux C,Pignon JP,et al.Concomitant radiochemotherapy based onplatin compounds in patients with locally advanced non-smallcelllung cancer (NSNLC):a meta-analysis of individual data from 1764 patients[J].Ann Oncol,2006,17(3):473-483.
|
|
|
|