椎体成形术和椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床效果观察

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (36 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of percutanous vertebroplasty(PVP)and percutanous Kyphoplasty (PKP)in patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.MethodsFrom October 2015 to October 2016,120 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures were enrolled in this study,and were treated with surgical treatment,and all patients were divided into the PVP group(n=60)and the PKP group(n=60) according to the procedure of patients′selection.Patients in the PVP group were treated with vertebroplasty.The patients in the PKP group were treated with kyphoplasty.The operation status of the patients was analyzed statistically.The patients were followed up for 6 months,and the postoperative rehabilitation status and operation safety of the two groups were analyzed statistically.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of bleeding and the operation time(P＞0.05).The hospitalization expenses in the PKP group was higher than that in the PVP group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The vertebral height of the two groups at 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that before operation,and the Cobb angle of the scoliosis of the two groups at 6 months after operation was less than that before operation,and the pain condition of the two groups at 6 months after operation was lower than that before operation,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The vertebral height of the PKP group at 6 months after operation was higher than that in the PVP group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the Cobb angle and pain score between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of complication between the two groups(P＞0.05).ConclusionThe prognosis of patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures treated with PKP is better,but the cost of treatment is higher.

Key words： Osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures Percutaneous vertebroplasty Percutanous kyphoplasty Efficacy

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Xu-hong
	WANG Ju
	LIU Yang-can
	XIE Shi-long
	YANG Lin

Cite this article:

CHEN Xu-hong,WANG Ju,LIU Yang-can, et al. Clinical effect observation of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(19): 71-73转80.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2017/V24/I19/71

[1]	黄必军，顾宇彤.PVP和PKP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较[J].海南医学，2015，26（7）：1041-1043.
[2]	陈学谦，赵继阳，陈郑增，等.PVP术与PKP术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折效果比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志，2014，23（10）：1064-1066.
[3]	印平，马远征，马迅，等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的治疗指南[J].中国骨质疏松杂志，2015，21（6）：643-648.
[4]	张国华，杜伟，罗鹏明，等.PVP与PKP治疗骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折的临床治疗效果比较[J].现代生物医学进展，2017，17（5）：909-912.
[5]	张继东，丁辉海，马晓峰，等.PKP治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2014，29（3）：272-273.
[6]	武志刚，郑宏伟，高彦文，等.PVP与PKP对骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者关节疼痛及关节功能影响的对比观察[J].山东医药，2017，57（12）：71-73.
[7]	周鹰飞，方志辉，杨艳敏，等.PKP与PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床效果比较[J].河北医药，2016，38（15）：2267-2269.
[8]	黎肇光.不同形态的骨水泥行椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的临床观察[J].颈腰痛杂志，2016，37（6）：479-481.
[9]	蒋刚.经皮椎体成形术与椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效对比研究[J].中国医药导刊，2014，15（5）：745-746，748.
[10]	周江军，吕仁发，赵敏，等.严重压缩骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的经皮微创治疗[J].中华内分泌外科杂志，2014，8（2）：172-174.
[11]	戴腾，施克勤.微创经皮椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效对比[J].山西医药杂志，2015，44（16）：1895-1897.
[12]	白煜.椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的效果观察[J].中国伤残医学，2017，25（4）：38-40.
[13]	Kim YJ，Lee JW，Kim KJ.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for intravertebral cleft：analysis of therapeutic effects and outcome predictors[J].Skeletal Radiol，2010，39（8）：757-766.
[14]	李洪德，何仕诚，张年明，等.单发和多发骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经椎体成形术治疗后再发骨折的对比分析[J].中国医学影像技术，2010，26（12）：2330-2333.
[15]	钱玉强.微创经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床效果观察[J].中外医学研究，2016，14（21）：43-45.