|
|
Application effect of multimodal analgesia based on the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery in mixed hemorrhoid surgery |
XIANG Guang-yang OU Chang-bai ZHANG Xiao-wei ZHOU Yun-tian |
Department of General Surgery, People′s Hospital of Huidong County in Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, Huidong 516300, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application and clinical effect of multimodal analgesia based on the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery in mixed hemorrhoid surgery. Methods From January to June 2019, 60 patients with mixed hemorrhoids admitted to our hospital to undergo milligan-morgan hemorrhodectomy were selected as the research objects. They were divided into observation group and control group according to the order of admission, with 30 cases in each group. During the perioperative period, patients in the observation group were subjected to multimodal analgesia based on the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery, while patients in the control group were subjected to traditional mode analgesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, postoperative first defecation time, postoperative first ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay time were observed between the two groups. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as drowsiness, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, itchy skin and respiratory depression within 48 h after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS scores of the observation group at different postoperative time points (immediately after surgery, at the 4th, 12th, 24th and 48th hour after surgery) were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The first defecation time and the first time to get out of bed after the observation group were earlier than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence rates of drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, respiratory depression and skin pruritus between the two groups within 48 h after surgery were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion The concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery in the perioperative application of patients with mixed hemorrhoids can significantly reduce the patients′ pain, has a good analgesic effect, facilitates the patients′ postoperative recovery, and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
余成栋.混合痔患者围手术期多模式镇痛效果观察[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2016,36(3):42-44.
|
[2] |
李大淦.肛肠病术后疼痛的西医治疗研究[J].医学信息,2015(41):450.
|
[3] |
黄河,池伟,蔡丽群.多模式镇痛疗法在重度混合痔术后的应用[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(11):2077-2078.
|
[4] |
美国结直肠外科医师协会标准化工作委员会,丁义江,皇甫少华,等.痔诊断和治疗指南(2010 修订版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012,11(3):243-247.
|
[5] |
黎介寿,吴孟超.普通外科手术学[M].2 版.北京:人民军医出版社,2011:449.
|
[6] |
钟立英.成人术后疼痛治疗进展[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018,5(30):180,182.
|
[7] |
江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133.
|
[8] |
江志伟,周嘉晖,成汇.多模式镇痛在加速康复外科中的作用[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2019,57(9):1-4,11.
|
[9] |
郑晓静,疏树华.多模式镇痛在术后快速康复中的临床研究进展[J].医学综述,2019,25(4):800-804.
|
[10] |
萧绮莉,苏玉环.多模式镇痛在混合痔外剥内扎术后的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2019,26(1):35-38.
|
[11] |
路强,丁路,郭玲玲,等.混合痔术后多模式镇痛的效果分析[J].安徽医学,2018,39(5):556-559.
|
[12] |
陆双伟,樊志敏,朱勇,等.多模式镇痛应用于混合痔术后镇痛的临床观察[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(34):94-97.
|
[13] |
孙红兰,李南,姜国丹.老年环状混合痔患者术后镇痛模式的临床效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(15):3824-3825.
|
[14] |
孙余挺,黄芙,周勤.不同镇痛方法对环状混合痔术后并发症的影响[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2012,32(7):61-63.
|
[15] |
石玉迎,郑丽华,智从从,等.复方亚甲蓝肛周皮下点状注射对混合痔术后镇痛的临床观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(2):203-206.
|
[16] |
毛鹏.PPH 术加亚甲蓝混合液注射减少混合痔术后肛门疼痛的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(24):21-22.
|
[17] |
周仲伍,张书信.不同配伍亚甲蓝混合液治疗混合痔术后疼痛的效果观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(2):199-201.
|
[18] |
刘俊红.痔术中放射状切开肛周皮肤防止术后水肿的临床研究[D].郑州:河南中医药大学(河南中医学院),2011.
|
[19] |
丁超,王琛.混合痔手术治疗的研究进展[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(14):12-14.
|
|
|
|