多层螺旋电子计算机断层扫描和数字化成像技术诊断周围型肺癌临床价值的对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical value of multisice computed tomography (MSCT) and digital radiography(DR)in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer.Methods A total of 75 patients with peripheral lung cancer admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Shenyang from October 2017 to October 2019 were selected as the research objects,and multi-slice spiral CT and DR examination were performed respectively.The clinical diagnostic rate and TNM staging coincidence rate of the two methods were compared.Results The detection rates of lobulation sign, cavity sign, burr sign, vacuole sign and bronchus sign, pleural effusion, spinous process, mediastinal lymph node enlargement and pleural indentation sign in 64 slice MSCT were higher than those in DR, with statistical differences (P＜0.05).The clinical diagnostic rate of 64 slice MSCT in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer(90.6667%)was higher than that of DR(70.6667%),the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The diagnostic coincidence rate of 64 slice MSCT (90.6667%) was higher than that of DR (65.3333%), the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The 64-slice MSCT can clearly show the signs of patients with peripheral lung cancer.The detection rate of peripheral lung cancer is relatively high, and the diagnostic coincidence rate for clinical TNM staging is relatively high, which is of great value for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer.

Key words： 64 slice MSCT Digital X-ray photography Peripheral lung cancer Imaging signs Clinical TNM staging

Received: 18 August 2020

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Bing

Cite this article:

LIU Bing. Comparison of clinical value of multisice computed tomography and digital radiography in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(20): 160-163.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I20/160

[8]	Bai RJ，Ren SH，Jiang HJ，et al.Accuracy of Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography for Preoperative Tumor Node Metastasis（TNM）Staging of Colorectal Carcinoma[J].Med Sci Monit，2017，23（12）：3470-3479.
[9]	李明玉，韩栋，娄杨，等.周围型肺癌CT 征象、病理及Ki-67 指数表达相关性研究[J].影像研究与医学应用，2018，14（5）：4835-4836.
[10]	Yang H，Fan HX，Song LH，et al.Relationship between Contrast-Enhanced CT and Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J].Oncol Res Treat.2017，40（9）：516-522.
[11]	刘伟忠，郭明涛.磁共振成像对周围型肺癌的诊断价值[J].影像研究与医学应用，2017，21（11）：247-248.
[12]	许利平，侯勤明.64 排CT 在周围型肺癌诊断中的临床价值分析[J].医学影像学杂志，2017，27（12）：2419-2423.
[13]	梁矿立，李永波，高彦斌，等.CT 联合DR 对早期周围型肺癌的诊断价值[J].现代生物医学进展，2017，17（28）：5565-5568.
[1]	陈明哲，吕春秀.CT 检查在早期周围型肺癌诊断中的应用价值及征象分析[J].中国基层医药，2018，25（18）：2316-2319.
[2]	黄玺.胸部X 线与CT 诊断36 例周围型肺癌的对照分析[J].中国医药指南，2019，23（14）：69-70.
[3]	黄文磊，沈枫，姚选军，等.多层螺旋CT 对周围型肺癌及局灶性机化性肺炎的鉴别诊断价值[J].CT 理论与应用研究，2018，27（4）：529-536.
[4]	王丽，丁岩，周健，等.CT 诊断周围型肺癌-腺癌临床分期与术后病理检查结果的比较分析[J].影像研究与医学应用，2018，13（2）：201-203.
[5]	钟文利.CT 与MRI 对周围型肺癌的诊断效果比照[J].影像研究与医学应用，2018，22（15）：64-65.
[6]	金丹，包权.螺旋CT 诊断肺癌的可行性与影像学表现探究[J].世界临床医学，2017，11（4）：384-385.
[7]	谭珊玲.周围型肺癌的多层螺旋CT 诊断体会[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2017，4（68）：13 399-13 400.
[14]	望云，刘士远，范丽，等.含薄壁囊腔周围型肺癌的CT 特征及病理基础分析[J].中华放射学杂志，2017，51（2）：96-101.
[15]	莫婉莹，李光宇，吴天文，等.周围型肺癌43 例CT 影像学特点分析[J].中国实用医刊，2018，45（2）：51-52.