|
|
Comparison of the effect of two different pregnancy aid regimens in patients with previous pregnancy aid failure with long-term early follicular phase |
HUANG Yun SHUAI Mei YUE Lin-lin |
Department of Reproductive and Genetics,Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of two different pregnancy aid regimens in patients with previous pregnancy aid failure with long-term early follicular phase.Methods From January 2019 to December 2020,a total of 122 patients admitted to Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital,who had failed the previous in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer assisted pregnancy and received the second assisted pregnancy were selected as the research subjects.According to the coin toss method,the patients were divided into group A(52 cases)and group B(70 cases).The patients in group A were treated with the long-term early follicular phase program,and the patients in group B were treated with the antagonist program.The clinical indicators and the results of ovulation induction were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistical significance in the number of eggs obtained and the number of embryos transferred between the two groups(P>0.05).The total dose of gonadotropin(Gn)in group B was less than that in group A,and Gn days were shorter than that in group A.The number of 2 prokaryotic embryos,cleavage number and transferable embryos in group B were more than that in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).On Gn initiation day,there was no statistical significance in FSH between two groups(P>0.05),the levels of estrogen(E2)and luteinizing hormone(LH)in group B were lower than those in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).On the day of human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG)injection,there was no significant difference in endometrial thickness between the two groups(P>0.05),the levels of E2 and progesterone in group B were higher than those in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistical significance in the optimal embryo rate,transplantation rate,blastocyst formation rate and early abortion rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The cumulative pregnancy rate in group B was higher than that in group A,and the incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS)was lower than that in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion For those who have failed the early follicular phase long program,the antagonist program for re-fertilization can effectively increase the cumulative pregnancy rate and reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS,and the effect is significant.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
吴小涛,陈冬丽,郑艳萍.卵泡期长方案HCG日LH 水平对体外受精结局的影响[J].华中科技大学学报,2019,48(6):704-707.
|
[2] |
李真,张俊韦,刘慧,等.早卵泡期长效长方案和拮抗剂方案在预期卵巢高反应患者中的应用比较及自身对照研究[J].中华生殖与避孕杂志,2020,40(12):978-985.
|
[3] |
曾湘晖,王莉云,纪冰.子宫内膜异位症合并不孕患者IVF治疗采用不同促排卵方案的妊娠结局比较[J].实用妇产科杂志,2020,36(2):145-148.
|
[4] |
刘玮,卢芳汀,王昊昱,等.人工黄体期方案在卵巢储备良好但前次黄体期长方案助孕失败患者中的应用:一项自身对照研究[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(9):68-69.
|
[5] |
李欢,李东晗,陈圆辉,等.拮抗剂方案与早卵泡期长效长方案应用于波塞冬2 型POR 患者IVF-ET 结局的比较[J].生殖医学杂志,2020,29(3):300-305.
|
[6] |
欧阳璐,王恩银,李婧,等.抗苗勒管激素水平对多囊卵巢综合征患者行卵泡期长效长方案助孕结局的影响[J].生殖医学杂志,2019,28(5):451-456.
|
[7] |
刘文霞,王碧君,刘曼曼,等.早卵泡期长效长方案与拮抗剂方案用于高龄多囊卵巢助孕效果比较[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(6):908-911.
|
[8] |
梁婷,黄伟媚.卵泡期高孕酮状态下促排卵方案与长方案促排卵在高龄卵巢功能低下患者中的应用效果比较[J].广西医学,2019,41(9):1082-1085.
|
[9] |
张帆.卵泡期长效长方案与黄体期短效长方案在卵巢储备良好患者IVF-ET 中的应用比较[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2019,27(2):245-246,223.
|
[10] |
闫泓霖,潘静,姚丽艳.助孕宁Ⅱ号治疗多囊卵巢综合征早孕先兆流产患者的临床疗效及对其炎症因子的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(12):132-136.
|
[11] |
张敏,姜宏.卵巢正常反应患者拮抗剂方案新鲜胚胎移植与全胚冷冻后首次冻融胚胎移植的临床结局比较[J].实用医学杂志,2020,36(1):74-78.
|
[12] |
汤友苗,王兴玲,娄华,等.不同来源精子应用于ICSI 治疗的早期临床结局[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(5):22-25.
|
[13] |
刘博文,陈娇,杨亦青,等.拮抗剂方案和长方案促排卵对PCOS 患者妊娠结局影响的Meta 分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2020,29(4):512-521.
|
[14] |
隋洋,周敏.体重指数对多囊卵巢综合征患者体外受精-胚胎移植助孕的影响[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(34):12-15.
|
[15] |
陈巧莉,李竞宇,刘卫卫,等.短期同步添加小剂量生长激素在体外受精失败患者再次助孕中的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2019,44(5):653-656.
|
|
|
|