Wiltse入路减压固定融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of Wiltse approach decompression and fixation fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated in the Department of Orthopedics of Qinzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2018 to July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.According to the surgical method,they were divided into the control group(40 cases)and the intervention group(40 cases).Tthe control group used the posterior median approach for fusion,and the intervention group used the Wiltse approach for fusion.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,postoperative pain,and recovery were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume of the intervention group were less than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The scores of visual analogue scale(VAS)in the intervention group at 3 and 14 days after operation were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI)of the intervention group at 1 and 6 months after operation were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion The Wiltse approach is more effective than the posterior median approach in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,which can improve the surgical index,quickly relieve the postoperative pain of the patient,and promote the postoperative recovery.It is worthy of popularization and application.

Key words： Paraspinal muscle space approach Posterior median approach Decompression and fixation Lumbar disc herniation

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHENG Hao-fen
	ZHENG Hao-xia
	LI Guan-zhen
	SU Jian
	MA Gui-chu

Cite this article:

ZHENG Hao-fen,ZHENG Hao-xia,LI Guan-zhen, et al. Clinical effect of Wiltse approach decompression and fixation fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(26): 112-114转119.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I26/112

[1]	杨广辉，潘玉林，郭小伟，等.后正中入路联合Wiltse 入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎失稳的临床疗效[J].中医正骨，2020，32（8）：17-23.
[2]	张通.椎旁肌间隙入路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效[J].山西卫生健康职业学院学报，2020，30（2）：36-38.
[3]	崔立尧.经椎旁肌间隙入路与传统后正中入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2018，18（68）：152-153.
[4]	李健，周涛，林昊，等.经椎旁肌间隙入路单侧椎弓根螺钉固定椎间融合治疗极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的疗效[J].川北医学院学报，2018，33（4）：514-516.
[5]	孟海，许峻川，王炳强，等.微通道辅助下经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2018，17（13）：1415-1418.
[6]	王瑶，李劲松，陈友虎，等.显微镜微通道入路与后正中入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志，2020，23（6）：796-799.
[7]	吴学仪，高鹏.两种手术方式治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效对比分析[J].临床研究，2020，28（12）：28-30.
[8]	李育敏，孙海东，李悫，等.微创经皮椎板间入路手术对腰椎间盘突出症患者神经根分离率和钙化清除率的影响[J].中国医学创新，2020，17（30）：49-52.
[9]	黄保华，钟远鸣，张家立，等.单切口经椎间孔入路全内镜下治疗双间隙腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国微创外科杂志，2020，20（10）：906-910.
[10]	沈昌焕，王晓林，曾凡伟，等.两种入路椎间孔镜手术治疗初次单节段腰椎间盘突出症[J].临床骨科杂志，2020，23（4）：502-505.
[11]	钟南，林斌珍，龙丹，等.脊柱内镜下椎旁肌间隙入路手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床效果[J].医疗装备，2019，32（19）：89-90.
[12]	张俊，余化龙，刘亚东，等.脊柱内镜下不同手术入路方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（9）：90-93，102.
[13]	包同新，王宇峰，郭文杰，等.Wiltse 入路与后正中入路TLIF 术式对腰椎间盘突出症患者疗效及CK 水平、NRS、ODI 评分的影响比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2018，17（4）：354-357.
[14]	延靖蕾.Wiltse 入路与后正中入路TLIF 术式对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较[J].东南大学学报（医学版），2018，37（4）：629-633.
[15]	李颖，谢兆林，谭海涛，等.肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉固定融合术治疗对腰椎间盘突出症患者围术期指标、术后腰痛VAS 评分及神经功能恢复的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志，2018，15（6）：90-93.