|
|
Effect comparison of aneurysm clipping and endovascular embolization of coil tumors operation in the treatment of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage |
YANG Na1 LI Ji-hua2▲ LI Ren-zi1 YUAN Bin2 MA Jun-chi1 GAO Jian-chao1 CUI Yong-peng2 LIU Yun2 |
1.Department of Internal Medicine-Neurology,Kailuan General Hospital,Hebei Province,Tangshan 063000,China;
2.Department of Neurosurgery,Kailuan General Hospital,Hebei Province,Tangshan 063000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effect of aneurysm clipping and endovascular embolization of coil tumors operation in the treatment of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Methods A total of 110 patients with highgrade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated in our hospital from September 2016 to February 2018 were selected and they were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random digital table method,there were 55 cases in each group.The two groups were given with conventional subarachnoid hemorrhage treatment.On this basis,patients in the control group were treated by the aneurysm clipping operation,while patients in the observation group were treated by the endovascular embolization of coil tumors operation.After 3 months of treatment,the incidence of complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.The Glasgow prognosis scale(GOS)was used to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of the two groups.Results The good prognosis rate of the observation group was 54.55%,which was higher than that of the control group(38.18%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in GOS score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05),after treatment,the GOS scores of both groups decreased,and the scores of observation group were lower than those of control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The main complications of the two groups were rebleeding,hydrocephalus and cerebral vasospasm.The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 16.36%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(30.93%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Aneurysm clipping and endovascular embolization of coil tumors operation in the treatment of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage can achieve certain therapeutic effect,but the total incidence of complications after endovascular embolization of coil tumors operation is lower,with higher safety and better curative effect.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
郑匡,田作富,谭显西,等.早期治疗高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的一年预后因素多中心研究[J].中华外科杂志,2016,54(7):534-539.
|
[2] |
宋炳伟,甄勇,何亮,等.显微夹闭手术时机对高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2015,12(7):352-355,379.
|
[3] |
呼铁民,于淼,张继伟,等.高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血颅内夹闭术与介入治疗的近期预后对比研究[J].中国全科医学,2015,18(26):3192-3195.
|
[4] |
刘炎,杭春华,茅磊,等.高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血颅内动脉瘤夹闭术后不同引流方式的疗效及对预后的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2017,16(6):623-626.
|
[5] |
王强,夏锡伟,邵耐远,等.高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血病人早期肠内营养的临床研究[J].肠外与肠内营养,2016,23(6):365-368.
|
[6] |
李刚,曹芳,焦松,等.弹簧圈瘤腔内栓塞与动脉瘤夹闭术治疗高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的效果对比[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(22):5587-5589.
|
[7] |
董永军.超早期显微夹闭手术治疗高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的预后效果分析[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2016,24(2):66-68.
|
[8] |
中国医师协会神经外科分会重症专家委员会.重症动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血管理专家共识(2015)[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2015,12(4):215-226.
|
[9] |
丁璇,王志刚,王成伟,等.不同治疗方式对高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(43):3054-3057.
|
[10] |
陈军辉,王玉海,杨理坤,等.超早期手术夹闭治疗高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2015,23(11):830-835.
|
[11] |
肖利杰,蒋敏.蛛网膜下腔出血Hunt-Hess分级和急性期并发症与预后关系分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2011,14(24):41-42.
|
[12] |
李爱国,刘之彝,龙晓东,等.颅内动脉瘤介入栓塞术和颅内夹闭术治疗高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的临床疗效观察[J].临床外科杂志,2018,26(7):497-500.
|
[13] |
Mende KC,Gelderblom M,Schwarz C,et al.Somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J].Neurosurg Focus,2017,43(5):17-19.
|
[14] |
Rowland MJ,Garry P,Westbrook J,et al.Acute impairment of saccadic eye movements is associated with delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J].J Neurosurg,2017,127(4):754-760.
|
[15] |
Malinova V,Schatlo B,Voit M,et al.The impact of temporary clipping during aneurysm surgery on the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J].J Neurosurg.2018,129(1):84-90.
|
[16] |
Ampie L,Choy W,Lamano JB,et al.Safety and outcomes of preoperative embolization of intracranial hemangioblastomas: a systematic review[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2016,150:143-151.
|
[17] |
KumarG,ShahripourRB,HarriganMR.Vasospasmontranscranial Doppler is predictive of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Neurosurg,2016,124(5):1257-1264.
|
[18] |
Ogden M,Bakar B,Karagedik M,et al.Analysis of biochemical laboratory values to determine etiology and prognosis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage:a clinical study[J].Neurol Res,2018,10:1-12.
|
|
|
|