|
|
|
| Safety analysis of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation in the treatment of limb fractures |
| HUANG Han-dao |
| Department of Orthopaedics,People′s Hospital of Huilai County,Guangdong Province,Huilai 515200,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the safety of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation for the treatment of limb fractures.Methods A total of 40 patients with limb fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected.They were divided into control group(n=20)and research group(n=20)according to the treatment protocol.In the control group,open reduction with compression plate was used,while in the research group,minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation was adopted.The efficacy and safety of the corresponding treatment protocols as interventions in the two groups were compared.Results In the research group,the operation time was(91.35±9.32)min,shorter than that of the control group([115.66±10.94]min)(P<0.05).The hospital stay in the research group was(14.22±5.31)d,shorter than that in the control group([19.92±6.36]d)(P<0.05).The time of fracture healing in the research group were(14.32±4.98)d,shorter than that in the control group([22.46±5.22]d)(P<0.05).Intraoperative blood loss in the research group were(88.31±12.66)ml,lesser in the control group([270.14±50.64]ml)(P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of the joint function recovery in research group was 90.00%,higher than that of the control group accounting for 60.00%(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the research group was 5.0%,much lower than that of the control group accounting for 30.00%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with open reduction,the minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation for patients with limb fractures is effective.The operation is better and the incidence of complications is lower.It has higher safety and is easier to accept by patients,which is worth promoting in clinical practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
庄强，卢水生，严胜军.专家型髓内钉和锁定钢板内固定治疗胫骨下段骨折的效果及安全性对比[J].中国当代医药，2016，23（30）：50-52.
|
| [2] |
毛华晋.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定治疗四肢骨折的效果观察[J].中国继续医学教育，2017，9（25）：70-71.
|
| [3] |
王更军.微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗四肢骨折并发症防治措施的分析[J].中国医药指南，2014，12（2）：136-137.
|
| [4] |
张建彪.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定在治疗四肢骨折中的临床分析[J].中国实用医刊，2015，42（24）：111-112.
|
| [5] |
陈冰，高彦平.经皮微创内固定术和钢板螺钉内固定术治疗四肢骨折的优劣差异[J].中国伤残医学，2017，25（14）：28-29.
|
| [6] |
李振立.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢粉碎骨折患者疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗，2015，26（6）：1340-1341.
|
| [7] |
王义.微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定在治疗四肢骨折患者中的应用[J].西藏医药，2017，38（6）：24-25.
|
| [8] |
冯仕华，陈转，郑开达.微创接骨板技术治疗50例四肢骨折患者的临床疗效分析[J].辽宁医学院学报，2013，34（3）：46-47.
|
| [9] |
马健.探讨微创接骨板技术治疗四肢骨折60例临床疗效[J].中国伤残医学，2016，24（22）：37-39.
|
| [10] |
兰文正.微创经皮钢板内固定治疗四肢骨折的临床观察[J].中国初级卫生保健，2014，28（8）：116-117.
|
| [11] |
段虹昊，何蔼民，魏登科等.四肢骨折患者采用锁定加压钢板与传统内固定术治疗的效果对照研究[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（30）：74-75.
|
| [12] |
李勇.可吸收止血微球在四肢骨折内固定术中的临床应用[J].中国现代医学杂志，2014，24（10）：89-91.
|
| [13] |
李伟.四肢骨折内固定术骨折愈合后内固定装置取出困难的原因及对策[J].湖南中医药大学学报，2016，36（A1）：520-521.
|
| [14] |
杨娇.外固定架和使用内固定术在治疗创伤骨科中四肢骨折患者的应用[J].中国伤残医学，2017，25（17）：37-38.
|
|
|
|
