|
|
Application of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure after ventilator weaning in preterm infants |
JIANG Yun |
Department of Neonatology, Jiujiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Jiujiang 332000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) after ventilator weaning in preterm infants. Methods A total of 50 preterm infants admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to July 2019 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into control group (n=25) and an observation group (n=25) by random number table method. NCPAP was used in the control group and NIPPV was used in the observation group. After treatment, the treatment effect, indicators of blood gas analysis, recovery, and near-term and long-term complications of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of ventilator weaning failure within 7 days after extubation,arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure(PaCO2),arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), pH, total hospital stay, biparietal diameter (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity(ROP), and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage of the two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). After treatment, the time of non-invasive ventilation and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion After ventilator weaning of premature infants, both NIPPV and NCPAP treatment can alleviate the hypoxic state of the infants, and the effect is remarkable. However, taking factors like the short-term and long-term complications of the infants into consideration, ventilation scheme should be appropriately chosen according to the specific conditions of the infants in clinic. If the infants′ condition allows, NIPPV can be preferentially selected to improve their quality of life.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
蔡琳,李晓东,刘丽芳,等.经鼻间歇正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的疗效观察[J].中国生育健康杂志,2016,27(6):529-533.
|
[2] |
王宋青,闻建军,施益农.经鼻间歇正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2016,21(12):2219-2222.
|
[3] |
中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会.早产儿经鼻间歇正压通气专家共识[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(6):440-442.
|
[4] |
黄晓睿,周文姬,高薇薇,等.两种经鼻通气方式在肺透明膜病早产儿拔管后运用的临床效[J].现代医院,2014,14(7):93-95.
|
[5] |
王柱,向建文,高薇薇,等.两种无创呼吸支持治疗极低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2018,20(8):603-607.
|
[6] |
王柱,高薇薇,陈佳,等.两种无创呼吸支持法治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效分析[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2017,32(4):269-273.
|
[7] |
翟淑芬.3 种无创辅助通气方式治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(21):4441-4445.
|
[8] |
曾军安,柯华,李占魁,等.同步经鼻间歇正压通气治疗早产儿频发呼吸暂停[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(8):810-813.
|
[9] |
牛俊红,陈星.经鼻间歇和持续正压通气治疗不同程度早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(2):101-104.
|
[10] |
邱学荣,崔晓,饶红萍.间歇与持续经鼻气道正压通气治疗极低和超低出生体重早产儿反复呼吸暂停的疗效比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2016,13(3):93-95.
|
[11] |
李慧敏,赵武.经鼻间歇正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2015,40(11):1612-1614.
|
[12] |
陈红雨,李丹,郭金珍.两种不同固定方法在新生儿经鼻持续正压通气的临床应用比较[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(6):772-775.
|
[13] |
陈佳,高薇薇,聂川,等.经鼻间歇与鼻塞式持续正压通气治疗早产低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中华围产医学杂志,2015,18(2):111-116.
|
[14] |
臧平,卢秀兰,唐亮,等.危重症患儿使用经鼻持续气道正压通气的时机探讨及评估[J].中国小儿急救医学,2018,25(11):808-812.
|
[15] |
朱文英,袁玉峰,张海燕,等.两种无创正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较[J].江苏医药,2017,43(24):1826-1827.
|
|
|
|