|
|
Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging quantitative analysis in ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion |
XIONG Shu-hong;XIAO Qiong;RUAN Jiu-gen;FU Shui-ping;SONG Ting;DING Yao;TAN Qiu-ping |
Medical Image Center, Xinyu People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Xinyu 338000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging quantitative analysis in ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Methods A total of 100 patients with early breast cancer who were diagnosed by DCE-MRI combined with DWI in Xinyu People′s Hospital from March 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into the control group(60 patients who were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS, by the pathological examination) and the observation group (40 patients who were diagnosed as DCIS-Mi by the pathological examination), according to the difference of diagnosis types in the pathological examination. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), early-phase enhancement rate (EER) and the characteristics in different MRI enhancement types were compared between the two groups. Results The ADCMin of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the ADCDR and EER of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05), while the ADCMax difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the numbers of non-phymatoid enhancement cases and phymatoid enhancement cases between the two groups (P>0.05). The non-phymatoid enhancement characteristics was compared between the two groups, the internal enhancement characteristics was compared between the two groups, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The proportion of homogeneous enhancement cases in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, while the proportion of heterogeneous enhancement cases was higher than that in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The distribution characteristics was compared between the two groups, with statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of cases of focal distribution in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the proportion of cases of segment distribution in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The differences in the characteristics of phymatoid enhancement between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of homogeneous enhancement cases in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, while the proportion of ring enhancement cases in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The proportion of cases with unclear lesion edge in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in all of the proportions of lesions in the shape (P>0.05). Conclusion DWI combined with DCE-MRI has a good diagnostic efficacy for DCIS-Mi, and the differential diagnosis of DCIS alone and DCIS- Mi can be performed based on lesion distribution and internal enhancement characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
张敏璐,彭鹏,吴春晓,等.2008-2012年中国肿瘤登记地区女性乳腺癌发病和死亡分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2019,41(4):315-320.
|
[2] |
刘琼,罗丹,马旭,等.2010~2014年浙江省肿瘤登记地区女性乳腺癌发病与死亡分析[J].中国肿瘤,2019,28(2):23-27.
|
[3] |
荣小翠,康一鹤,吴勇超,等.不同亚型乳腺导管原位癌与X 线摄影和临床病理特征的相关性研究[J].重庆医学,2019,48(13):2245-2249.
|
[4] |
杨敏,罗静,李晶,等.非肿块型乳腺癌超声影像学特点与病理相关性分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2020,35(7):571-572.
|
[5] |
孙亚冬,李连方,刘山青,等.乳腺导管原位癌与导管原位癌伴微浸润的临床病理特点及预后对比分析[J].中国实验诊断学,2019,23(5):62-66.
|
[6] |
龚俊峰,李晓燕,王永杰.对比增强能谱乳腺X 线成像,MRI 动态增强联合DWI 评估不同乳腺癌分子分型的价值研究[J].磁共振成像,2020,11(12):1170-1173.
|
[7] |
杜惠军,王晓燕,丁晓燕,等.DWI 联合DCE-MRI 及高频彩超在判定乳腺占位良恶性中的Meta 分析[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(4):49-54.
|
[8] |
贾巍,宋瑞,王勇,等.术前穿刺活检与术中冰冻病理诊断乳腺导管原位癌伴微浸润的准确性比较[J].广西医学,2019,41(22):2854-2855,2858.
|
[9] |
程流泉,李席如,刘梅,等.多参数MRI 的BI-RADS 分类对乳腺病变的诊断效能[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2015,23(3):176-182.
|
[10] |
康万里,刘洋,唐神结,等.北京市通州区结核病患者发病部位的关联性研究[J].中国防痨杂志,2018,40(1):94-97.
|
[11] |
吴朋,崔蕾,郭宏兵,等.最小表观扩散系数、表观扩散系数差及磁共振增强扫描对乳腺导管原位癌和微浸润的鉴别诊断[J].实用医学杂志,2019,35(12):2000-2004.
|
[12] |
张明帅,刘思吟,蒋威华,等.乳腺导管原位癌伴微小浸润腋窝前哨淋巴结转移的危险因素分析[J].中国医药,2019,14(4):562-565.
|
[13] |
刘华.DWI 及DCE-MRI 对肌肉骨骼病变患者良恶性鉴别诊断效能的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2019,34(4):92-93.
|
[14] |
于晓军,陈永升,王春艳,等.MRI 表现及ADC 直方图对预测乳腺浸润性导管癌脉管浸润的价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(2):68-72.
|
[15] |
刘瑜琳,章蓉,岳丽娜,等.基于肿瘤全域ADC 直方图与乳腺癌免疫组化指标的相关性[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2020,210(11):37-41.
|
[16] |
连鹏,张秋芳,王利.动态对比增强磁共振成像及扩散加权成像在乳腺癌术前诊断中的应用[J].实用放射学杂志,2019,35(10):1599-1602.
|
[17] |
韩思佳,金晓明,刘臻,等.乳腺导管原位癌伴微浸润的临床及影像学特征[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(8):1262-1263.
|
[18] |
林鸣琴,庄淑莲,杨爽,等.乳腺影像学报告及数据系统分类对肉芽肿性乳腺炎与乳腺癌鉴别诊断的价值[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(3):75-79.
|
|
|
|