|
|
Investigation on liver and kidney function of 849 radiation workers in hospital |
YE Shu-min1 LIU Li2 |
1.Department of Physical Examination,Fujian Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Hospital,Fujian Province,Fuzhou 350025;
2.Department of Laboratory Medicine,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fujian Province,Fuzhou 350003 |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the liver and kidney function examination of radiation staff in some medical institutions in Fujian Province,and to explore the effect of low-dose ionized radiation on liver and kidney function of radiation staff.Methods The physical examination personnel in the Fujian Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Hospital in August 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the research subjects,and divided into the observation group(849 hospital radiation staff)and the control group(398 non radiation exposed health examination personnel of the same period)according to the occupational history.Blood samples were collected on an automatic biochemical analyzer to detect the liver and kidney functions of the two groups,and the results were compared.Results The levels of alanine aminotransferase(ALT),blood urea nitrogen(BUN)and creatinine(CR)in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The level of glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT)in the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).According to gender,the levels of ALT,GGT,BUN and CR in the observation group of male were higher than those in the same group of female,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The observation group was divided into four groups according to the age,the GGT,BUN levels were compared among each age groups,with statistical differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in GGT level between the age 41-<51 years group and the age ≥51 years group(P>0.05),while the other groups were compared in pairs,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant of BUN levels between the age 31-<41 years group and the age 41-<51 years group,and no statistically significant of BUN levels between the age 41-<51 years group and the age 41-<51 years group(P>0.05);while the other groups were compared in pairs,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the ALT,CR levels were compared among each age groups,with no statistical differences(P>0.05).The observation group was divided into four groups according to the seniority period,the GGT,BUN,CR levels were compared among each age groups,with statistical differences(P<0.05);the GGT levels between the seniority period <11 years group with other three groups were compared,with statistical differences(P<0.05);the BUN levels between the seniority period <11 years group with the seniority period 21-<30 years group were compared,and the BUN levels between the seniority period <11 years group with the seniority period ≥30 years group were compared,with statistical differences(P<0.05);the CR levels between the seniority period <11 years group with the seniority period 11-<21 years group were compared,and the CR levels between the seniority period <11 years group with the seniority period ≥30 years group were compared,with statistical differences(P<0.05);while the other groups were compared in pairs,there were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05);and GGT,BUN levels gradually increase with age and seniority.The liver and kidney functions of different types of work were compared,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the ALT and GGT levels of the interventional radiation group was higher than the other three groups,with statistical differences(P<0.05);the BUN levels of the radioactive diagnostic group was lower than the radiation group and the interventional radiation group,with statistical differences(P<0.05);the CR levels of the radioactive diagnostic group was lower than the other three groups,with statistical differences(P<0.05);while the other groups were compared in pairs,there were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion Long-term low-dose ionization radiation has a certain damage to the liver and kidney function of radiation workers.GGT and BUN levels increase with age and service with a cumulative effect.The radioactive staff should enhance the awareness of radiation protection,strengthen scientific protection measures,and reduce radioactive damage.
|
|
|
|
|
[5] |
杨文峰,杨志祥,金增强,等.放射性皮肤损伤临床诊断与治疗[J].中国辐射卫生,2020,29(1):1-6.
|
[6] |
中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ235-201l.放射工作人员职业健康监护技术规范[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,1-6.
|
[7] |
卫生部临床检验中心.全国临床检验操作规程[M].第3版.南京:东南大学出版社,2006-11-1:406-467.
|
[8] |
赵田禾,王李晋,周敏,等.辐射从业人员丙氨酸转氨酶与谷氨酰转肽酶升高的危险因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2017,44(14):2522-2527.
|
[1] |
高宇,王平,韩林,等.放射工作人员染色体畸变研究现状[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2018,38(8):635-640.
|
[2] |
李洁清,毛雪松,马娅,等.介入放射工作人员眼晶体健康状况调查[J].中国辐射卫生,2019,28(5):485-490.
|
[3] |
石瑞芬,董雪梅,陈松根,等.某市医用放射工作人员甲状腺功能调查分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(1):28-30.
|
[4] |
沙磊,谭维维.南通市2014年放射工作人员健康监护结果分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2017,26(1):44-48.
|
[9] |
时正贤,刘海琴.对153 例放射工作人员进行职业健康检查结果的分析[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(16):188-189.
|
[10] |
郭菲,高艳玲,门莎莎,等.不同年龄和性别健康查体人群生化参数和肿瘤标志物的临床分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2018,25(11):1644-1649.
|
[11] |
王雅楠.150 例酒精依赖患者肝功能生物化学指标检测结果分析[J].中国医学工程,2020,28(11):100-102.
|
[12] |
刘成花,付彩霞,解承娟,等.脂肪肝患者血清补体水平变化及临床意义[J].中国综合临床,2017,33(10):907-911.
|
[13] |
朱玲莉.放射工作人员2912 例肝肾功能检查结果分析[J].淮海医药,2013,31(4):341.
|
[14] |
邱毅,张丽娥,陈小红,等.广西874 名放射工作人员肝功能指标分析[J].环境与职业医学,2013,30(10):790-793.
|
[15] |
陈兵,吕孝敏.低剂量电离辐射生物效应分析[J].化工设计通讯,2019,45(11):113,141.
|
[16] |
龚力,孙爱娟,何谦,等.低剂量电离辐射效应及其对我国放射作业人员血液指标影响研究进展[J].中国职业医学,2018,45(1):115-118.
|
[17] |
卢桂才,姬旭莉,孔庆宇,等.宁夏9 家医疗机构放射工作人员健康状况调查[J].中国辐射卫生,2015,24(6):580-582.
|
[18] |
赵然,汪安勇,陈香存.综合性医院构建放射工作人员职业健康管理体系的实践与思考[J].中国辐射卫生,2020,29(6):668-671.
|
|
|
|