|
|
Perioperative effect of ultrasonic iliohypoabdominal and ilioinguinal nerve block on pelvic fracture patients |
YANG Li ZHANG Bo-qing HUANG Hai-zhen BI Yan GU Yue-feng XIAO Qing-hua QIU Wei-dong |
Department of Anesthesiology, the First People′s Hospital of Shaoguan City |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the perioperative effects of ultrasound iliac inferior abdominal nerve (IHN) and iliac ventral sulcus nerve (IIN) block on pelvic fracture surgery. Methods A total of 90 patients with pelvic fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery in the First People′s Hospital of Shaoguan City from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. According to random number table method, they were divided into the ultrasound group and the control group, with 45 cases in each group. Patients in the ultrasound group received ultrasound-guided IHN and IIN block combined general anesthesia, while patients in the control group received routine general anesthesia. Hemodynamics, intraoperative anesthesia dosage, postoperative pain in the operative area and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups at different time points. Results There were no statistically significant differences in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in the ultrasound group at 5 min before surgery (T0), the beginning of surgery (T1), 30 min (T2), 60 min (T3), at the end of surgery (T4), and 15 min after extubation under general anesthesia (T5) (P>0.05). MAP and HR of the control group at T1 and T2 were lower than T0,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in MAP and HR at T3, T4 and T5 between the two groups (P>0.05). The dosage of Propofol and Remifentanil in the ultrasound group were less than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the dosage of Sufentanil and Rocuronium between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative pain scores in the ultrasound group at 2, 12, 24 and 48 h were lower than those in the control group, and the total incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasoundguided IHN and IIN block combined with general anesthesia can effectively maintain hemodynamic stability during pelvic fracture surgery, reducing the use of narcotic drugs, to relieve postoperative pain, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
姜铧财,龙雳,李森.高位髂腹股沟入路治疗Tile C型骨盆骨折的应用解剖及临床疗效[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2020,38(4):471-475.
|
[2] |
唐经励,刘搏宇,胡居正,等.Starr 架辅助复位INFIX 与前柱螺钉内固定治疗不稳定骨盆骨折临床比较分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(1):9-13.
|
[3] |
俞仲翔,詹红生,史萌,等.微创小切口与髂腹股沟入路治疗Tile B 型骨盆骨折临床疗效比较[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2019,23(6):439-444.
|
[4] |
王叙进,方诗元,徐磊,等.有限元法分析不同内固定方法治疗复杂性骨盆骨折的力学稳定性[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(27):4354-4358.
|
[5] |
吴云,金啸,叶松.超声引导下髂腹股沟及髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹直肌鞘阻滞在腹腔镜小儿疝高位结扎术中的应用[J].医药导报,2018,37(8):973-976.
|
[6] |
王远彬,刘盼盼,叶润娣,等.超声引导下腹横平面联合髂腹股沟,髂腹下神经阻滞在高龄患者斜疝手术中的应用[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(22):103-107.
|
[7] |
孙兵,车晓明.视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J].中华神经外科杂志,2012,28(6):645.
|
[8] |
张亮,许庆利,梁钟鸣,等.微创内固定治疗Tile B 型骨盆骨折31 例[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2018,24(6):86-90.
|
[9] |
王大风,王朝南,杨杰.微创前路钢板内固定治疗骨盆骨折32 例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2020,28(8):67-69.
|
[10] |
汤利,李娟,徐俊.骨盆骨折行经皮骶骨螺钉固定病人的综合护理[J].护理研究,2018,32(7):1148-1150.
|
[11] |
于志勇,白龙,王树芬,等.桥接系统与锁定钢板在骨盆骨折治疗中的对照研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,7(15):66-68.
|
[12] |
罗声臻,潘永英,盛福庭,等.超声引导髂筋膜腔隙与髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经复合阻滞在老年患者髋关节置换术术后镇痛中的作用[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2017,38(6):506-509,514.
|
[13] |
杨宁,左明章,孟小燕,等.超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝中的应用[J].中国临床医生杂志,2017,45(3):48-51.
|
[14] |
纪健,李亚春,鲁应军,等.超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果及安全性分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(10):8-10.
|
[15] |
龚洁坤,田鑫,王琦睿,等.超声引导的神经阻滞和全身麻醉在下肢骨折紧急外固定术中的应用比较[J].北京医学,2018,40(12):1175-1176.
|
[16] |
易治国,赵欣蕊,李娟,等.超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年斜疝手术最少药物剂量的探讨[J].医学临床研究,2018,35(11):2190-2192.
|
[17] |
彭毅梅,谭红保,赵倩.超声引导髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞在日间疝修补术中的应用效果[J].中国医药,2017,12(8):1221-1223.
|
[18] |
濮健峰,王梅芳,潘四磊,等.超声引导下以旋髂深动脉为标记的髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年斜疝手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(10):974-976.
|
|
|
|