|
|
Application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in pregnant women with scarred uterus |
OU Feng-ying CEN Shi-Qun LIU Qiu-yun |
Department of Obstetrics, Yangchun People′s Hospital, Guangdong Province, Yangchun 529600, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To probe into the application effects of comprehensive nursing intervention in pregnant women with scarred uterus. Methods A total of 100 cases of pregnant women with scarred uterus who were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were retrospective analyzed, and the patients were divided into control group(n=50) and observation group (n=50) according to the nursing plan. The control group were treated with the routine nursing intervention, while the observation group were treated with the comprehensive nursing intervention. Then, the duration of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, hospitalization time, pain score and pregnancy outcome of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The total course of labor and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, the amount of postpartum hemorrhage was less than that in the control group, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and cesarean section rate were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Apgar score between the two groups (P>0.05).The total nursing satisfaction in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of comprehensive nursing intervention for pregnant women with scarred uterus are especially significant, which can effectively improve pregnancy outcomes, reduce labor time, reduce postpartum hemorrhage and pain, and ensure the safety of mothers and infants, thus it has clinical application value.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘沼清.产前护理干预在改善瘢痕子宫阴道分娩产妇分娩结局中的应用效果观察[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2017,(6):90-92.
|
[2] |
巴桑卓嘎.产前护理干预在改善瘢痕子宫阴道分娩产妇分娩结局中的应用效果观察[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(9):262.
|
[3] |
潘秀枝.采用不同的分娩方式对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇母婴结局的影响[J].当代医药论丛,2017,15(19):65-66.
|
[4] |
张晓娇,张俊.综合护理干预对高龄孕妇瘢痕子宫产妇的产程和分娩后疼痛的影响[J].黑龙江医药科学,2018,41(3):154-156.
|
[5] |
李晓华,权祥菊.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的安全性及阴道试产的适应证[J].检验医学与临床,2018,15(3):397-399.
|
[6] |
莫丹霞.护理干预对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的影响分析[J].中外医学研究,2017,15(4):65-67.
|
[7] |
王明霞,耿俐, 辉平.疤痕子宫二次妊娠经阴道分娩的母婴结局分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(12):1682-1684.
|
[8] |
朱树国.综合护理干预在瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩中的应用效果观察[J].中外女性健康研究,2018,26(4):20-21.
|
[9] |
霍红伟.导乐陪产联合综合护理干预对瘢痕子宫再妊娠孕妇阴道分娩成功率及产程时间的影响[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(14):185-186.
|
[8] |
陈丽华,曾月娥,王璐,等.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道试产患者472 例的产程观察与护理[J].解放军护理杂志,2017,34(19):48.
|
[9] |
何立梅, 冯倩,白春晓,等.气囊仿生助产术在瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩中的临床效果观察[J].贵州医药,2018,42(2):190-192.
|
[10] |
曹庆玲,周怀君.综合干预降低瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产率的临床研究[J].局解手术学杂志,2018,27(7):43-48.
|
[11] |
申南,范玲.产程管理新模式下总产程超过24 小时孕妇的分娩结局探讨[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(3):194-199.
|
[12] |
赵瑞芬,范玲.新产程模式下不同高危孕产妇的第二产程时限与母儿结局[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(11):836-841.
|
[13] |
聂芹.瘢痕子宫再次足月妊娠分娩应用综合护理干预的临床研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(4):135-137.
|
[14] |
马爱青,李明江.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩的风险及再次行剖宫产术的相关指标分析[J].中国性科学,2016,10(11):112-114.
|
[15] |
魏素花,叶晓东,郭梅.129 例剖宫产后再次妊娠经阴道分娩产妇的护理[J].护理学报,2016,23(7):64-66.
|
[16] |
卞吟梅,吴蕾,付锦艳.助产士门诊服务模式对瘢痕子宫孕妇分娩结局的影响[J].现代临床护理,2018,17(10):70-73.
|
|
|
|