内镜下黏膜切除术与内镜下圈套高频电切术治疗结直肠息肉的临床效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect of endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic snare high frequency electrotomy in the treatment of colorectal polyps.Methods Eighty patients with colorectal polyps admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to May 2019 were selected as the research objects,they were divided into experimental group and control group according to the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The experimental group underwent endoscopic mucosal resection,the control group underwent endoscopic snare high frequency electrotomy.The operation time,postoperative hospital stay,polypectomy and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the experimental group was (9.28±1.27) min,which was longer than (7.62±1.32)min of the control group,the postoperative hospital stay in the experimental group was (3.42±1.98) d,which was shorter than (4.68±1.80) d of the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Polypectomy was better in the experimental group than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The total incidence of complications in the experimental group was 5.00%,which was lower than 22.50% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with endoscopic snare high frequency electrotomy,endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with colorectal polyps can shorten the patient′s postoperative hospital stay,improve the patients′ polypectomy,and reduce the incidence of complications,which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Colorectal polyps Endoscopic mucosal resection Endoscopic snare high frequency electrotomy

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Xue-qi
	LIN Xing-di
	NING Ying-qin

Cite this article:

WANG Xue-qi,LIN Xing-di,NING Ying-qin. Clinical effect comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic snare high frequency electrotomy in the treatment of colorectal polyps[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(5): 60-62.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I5/60

[8]	吴杰雯，高飞，何西，等.三种圈套器切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的疗效分析[J].上海医学，2019，42（2）：92-96.
[9]	陈木龙，颜松龄，张国伟，等.腹腔镜联合结肠镜手术与开腹手术治疗特殊类型结直肠息肉的临床研究[J].中国医师进修杂志，2016，39（6）：540-542.
[10]	许峰.内镜下黏膜切除术与高频电凝套扎术治疗胃肠道息肉的疗效及安全性[J].皖南医学院学报，2018，37（5）：36-38.
[1]	陈文峰，吕惠芳，范文伟，等.改良圈套器行内镜黏膜下剥离术切除结直肠息肉的临床应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2018，21（11）：1306-1308.
[2]	黄斌，张玉茹，刘连成，等.结肠镜辅助腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠息肉疗效分析[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志，2017，23（1）：82-84.
[3]	滕冬梅，李春花，邓磊，等.医护四手操作模式与单手操作模式在结直肠息肉内镜下切除术中的临床比较[J].检验医学与临床，2019，16（2）：96-98.
[4]	毕小刚，沈鹏臻，周文雄，等.经结肠镜高频电圈套器联合尼龙绳套扎术与高频电切术治疗宽蒂息肉的术后血清指标比较[J].中国内镜杂志，2017，23（6）：77-81.
[5]	刘利平，王莹，曹鹏.内镜下黏膜切除术与高频电切术治疗消化道难治性息肉的疗效分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗，2018，23（3）：374-377.
[6]	李倩，李楠杉，劳月琼，等.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠息肉437例分析[J].中国内镜杂志，2017，23（6）：34-39.
[7]	李敏，张萌，崔世芳，等.无痛肠镜下高频电凝电切治疗结肠息肉的护理效果分析[J].中国临床研究，2016，29（6）：842-843.
[11]	倪阵，陈虹彬，刘炼炼，等.内镜下黏膜剥离术和内镜下黏膜切除术治疗153例结直肠癌前病变和早期癌的疗效对比[J].中华消化杂志，2016，36（2）：122-124.
[12]	檀心广，胡志方，李福祥，等.内镜下黏膜切除术与高频电切术治疗消化道息肉的疗效对比分析[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志，2016，24（9）：690-692.
[13]	李江虹，黄国进，成翠娥，等.内镜黏膜切除术与高频电凝圈套切除术治疗结直肠无蒂息肉的疗效对比[J].中国临床医学，2017，24（1）：115-118.
[14]	贺利影，吴学勇，吴伟.电子肠镜下高频电凝电切圈套治疗大肠息肉的效果分析[J].陕西医学杂志，2017，46（12）：1666-1667.
[15]	胡莹，丁百静，李宗先.放大内镜联合窄带成像、醋酸与靛胭脂染色内镜对胃黏膜病变的临床价值[J].安徽医药，2019，23（5）：881-884.