|
|
|
| Clinical effect of minimally invasive implantation repairing the elderly patients with the loss of free end of the posterior teeth |
| RONG Zhu-ping |
| Department of Stomatology,Ganzhou Municipal Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive implantation repairing the loss of free end of the posterior teeth in the elderly.Methods Sixty elderly patients with the loss of free end of the posterior teeth were enrolled in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2017 as the research objects,and they were randomly divided into conventional implant restoration group (30 cases) and minimally invasive implant restoration group (30 cases).Patients in the conventional implant restoration group adopt conventional implant restoration methods,while patients in the minimally invasive implant restoration group adopt minimally invasive implant restoration methods.The recovery pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]) score,operation time,health survey scale (SF-36) score before and after treatment,masticatory function score and total incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results Before treatment,there were no significant difference in SF-36 and masticatory function scores between the two groups (P>0.05).After treatment,the SF-36 and masticatory function scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).After treatment,SF-36 and masticatory function scores of patients in minimally invasive implant restoration group were higher than those in conventional implant restoration group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).VAS score of patients in minimally invasive implant restoration group was lower than that in conventional implant restoration group,and the operation time was shorter than that in conventional implant restoration group,with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in minimally invasive implant restoration group was lower than that in conventional implant restoration group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive implantation repairing the elderly patients with the loss of free end of the posterior teeth can achieve better results,and can effectively reduce the pain of patients in repair,shorten the treatment time,improve the health level and chewing function of patients,and reduce the total incidence of complications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
栗洪师，王雅迪，刘洪臣，等.CBCT 在骨质疏松老年人微创种植牙上颌窦底内提升术中的应用[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志，2015，13（2）：97-100.
|
| [2] |
栗洪师，李冬霞，冯岩，等.健康管理对老年人口腔微创种植体边缘骨稳定性的影响[J].中华健康管理学杂志，2015，（2）：102-107.
|
| [3] |
谭智，刘萍，杨晶，等.不翻瓣微创技术在牙齿种植中的临床应用[J].数理医药学杂志，2018，31（11）：1604-1606.
|
| [4] |
吴纪楠，陈俊兰，林少珍，等.Zimmer 种植体在上前牙即刻种植与修复中的临床应用[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版），2015，2（5）：400-404.
|
| [5] |
田杰华，邸萍，林野，等.单牙即刻种植椅旁数字化即刻修复的临床观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志，2017，52（1）：3-9.
|
| [7] |
董鑫，王丽君，杨小东.美学区单侧连续多颗上前牙缺失的微创即刻种植与修复——附1例病例报道[J].中国口腔种植学杂志，2018，23（3）：147-130.
|
| [8] |
刘冰锋.微创环切术在口腔种植修复中的临床应用分析[J].中国美容医学，2018，27（9）：101-103.
|
| [9] |
孙云，王静.微创环切术对种植修复效果影响的研究[J].口腔医学研究，2017，33（6）：671-674.
|
| [10] |
王亚玲，曹直.微创种植修复老年人后牙游离端缺失的临床疗效分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志，2017，33（3）：173-175.
|
| [13] |
王丽君，董鑫，赵昕霞，等.美学区单牙缺失窄间隙的种植修复一例[J].中国口腔种植学杂志，2018，23（2）：78-80.
|
| [6] |
Guiahi M，McBride M，Sheeder J，et al.Short-term treatment of bothersome bleeding for etonogestrel implant users using a 14-day oral contraceptive pill regimen：a randomized controlled trial[J].Obstet Gynecol，2015，126（3）：508-513.
|
| [11] |
Kan B，Coskunses FM，Mutlu I，et al.Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible：three-dimensional finite element analysis[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2015，44（7）：908-913.
|
| [14] |
彭文军，张海燕.单颗后牙缺失不翻瓣种植短期临床观察[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志，2017，15（3）：161-165.
|
| [15] |
封伟，薛敏，张士剑，等.前牙美学区不翻瓣种植与翻瓣种植对种植体周围组织的影响[J].中华医学美学美容杂志，2016，22（3）：165-168.
|
|
|
|
