|
|
Application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in improving expectant treatment of placenta previa |
LU Jin-wen |
Department of Obstetrics,Lufeng People′s Hospital,Guangdong Province,Lufeng 516500,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in improving the expectant treatment of placenta previa.Methods A total of 98 cases of expectant pregnant women with placenta previa treated in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the random number table method,they were divided into observation group(49 cases)and control group (49 cases).The control group was given routine nursing intervention,while the observation group was given comprehensive nursing intervention.Pregnancy outcomes and maternal and infant status were compared between the two groups.Results The termination time of pregnancy in the observation group was(36.9±3.0)weeks,which was higher than that in the control group of([33.2±3.1]weeks),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group was([406.2±40.2]ml),less than that in the control group of([465.9±50.3]ml),the difference was significant(P<0.05);the puerperal infection rate in the observation group was 2.0%,lower than that in the control group (10.2%).There was statistical significance(P<0.05);the Apgar score of observation group was(9.5±0.4)points,higher than that of control group([8.0±0.2]points),with statistical significance(P<0.05);the weight of observation group was(3.9±0.8)kg,higher than that in the control group([3.0±0.2]kg),with statistical significance(P<0.05);the abnormal rate of fetal position of observation group was 2.00%,and the rate of respiratory distress was 2.00%,both of which were lower than those of the control group (10.2%and 8.2%),had significant differences(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in perinatal mortality between the two groups(P>0.05);the overall satisfaction of the observation group was 97.9%,higher than 81.6%of the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Nursing intervention has a significant effect in the clinical application of expectant placenta previa therapy,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
林瑾,林玉平,林晖,等.PDCA护理模式在凶险型前置胎盘患者护理过程中的应用[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(13):2744-2746.
|
[2] |
徐青青,章桂娇.前置胎盘期待疗法孕妇的综合护理效果评价[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(20):2850-2851.
|
[3] |
Dubé E,Ethier-chiasson M,Lafond J.Modulation of cholesterol transport by insulin-treated gestational diabetes mellitus in human full-term placenta[J].Biol Reprod,2013,88(1):16.
|
[4] |
张丽,杨孜.优质护理服务模式指导下的护理干预措施对凶险性前置胎盘患者的影响[J].中国医药导报,2013,10(9):136-137.
|
[5] |
贺英英,王波,林少英.助产士孕期营养指导对49例妊娠期糖尿病母婴结局的影响[J].中国民族民间医药,2016,25(8):108-109.
|
[6] |
王建英,曹建用,陈芳,等.优质护理服务模式在凶险性前置胎盘患者中的应用效果[J].国际护理学杂志,2018,37(7):914-916.
|
[7] |
于新燕.期待疗法与针对性护理在前置胎盘产妇中的应用效果[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(21):156-157.
|
[8] |
周巧丽.妊娠合并前置胎盘的临床观察与护理[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(8):746-747.
|
[9] |
程明清.优质护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者及新生儿预后的作用[J].国际护理学杂志,2015,34(6):767-768.
|
[10] |
郑品端,侯霞,谭桂莲,等.期待疗法在54例前置胎盘护理的临床观察及护理体会[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2013,35(3):290-292
|
[11] |
周丽,周玮芳.孕晚期前置胎盘阴道出血期待疗法综合优质护理干预效果观察[J].中外女性健康研究,2017,(14):18-20
|
[12] |
杨彩霞,谭锦婷,吕艳红.前置胎盘期待疗法的护理干预临床效果观察[J].中国医药指南,2012,10(18):465-466.
|
[13] |
印玲.优质护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者预后的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2017,27(14):178-179.
|
[14] |
李华英,付义霞,李岚,等.优质护理服务模式指导下的护理干预措施对凶险性前置胎盘患者的影响[J].临床医学工程,2013,20(6):747-748.
|
[15] |
刘新博,程卫平.优质护理干预对凶险性前置胎盘患者及新生儿预后的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2018,34(9):701-705.
|
[16] |
王娓.系统化护理干预对前置胎盘行期待疗法孕妇的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(10):33-35.
|
[17] |
胡幼眉.系统化护理用于前置胎盘期待疗法孕妇护理中的效果[J].医药前沿,2017,7(14):294-295.
|
[18] |
於艾梅.阶段性目标护理对前置胎盘期待疗法孕妇负性情绪及妊娠结局的影响[J].全科护理,2017,15(11):1340-1342.
|
[19] |
张晓琴.护理干预提高前置胎盘期待疗法的效果分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(32):6249.
|
[20] |
曾敏.前置胎盘孕妇期治疗法中实施系统化护理对妊娠结局的影响分析[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(29):153-154.
|
|
|
|