|
|
Meta analysis of the effect of different anesthetic methods on vertebral percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures |
CHENG Kang-yao1 MO Wen2 LIU Dong-mei2 LYU Wei-bo1▲ |
1.Nursing College of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China;
2.Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200032,China |
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effects of general anesthesia and local anesthesia to patients undergoing percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods Papers involving the effect of general anesthesia and local anesthesia to patients undergoing percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were searched in Cochrane Library,JBI Library,Pubmed,Medline,EMbase,OVID,CNKI,CBM,VIP and Wanfang Data to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs)by computer retrieval.A quality assessment scale was developed to identify each potentially qualified document,moderate and high quality documents were selected for data extraction.RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta-analysis.Results indexes included intraoperative blood loss,operation time,bone cement leakage rate,nerve injury rate,VAS scores,hospital stays,postoperative kyphosis angle after 1 day.Results 6 eligible documents were identified for pooled analysis.The results of Meta-analyses showed that the nerve injury rate of the local anesthesia group was lower than that of the general anesthesia group[OR=0.16,95%CI(0.04,0.73),P=0.02<0.05],the hospital stays was shorter than that in the general anesthesia group[WMD=-2.80,95%CI(-3.82,-1.78),P<0.05],but the postoperative kyphosis angle after 1 day of the general anesthesia group was smaller than that of the local anesthesia[SMD=0.39,95%CI(0.04,0.74),P=0.03<0.05].There was no difference between general anesthesia and local anesthesia group in other indexes.Conclusion The data indicates that local anesthesia can reduce the incidence of nerve injury,shorten the hospitalization time,but kyphosis angle recovery of general anesthesia group is better than local anesthesia.Choosing anesthesia way is depending on the actual situation of patients and doctors.
|
|
About author:: 程康耀,2016级在读硕士研究生 |
|
|
|
[1] |
汪东,牛国旗.经皮椎体成形术及椎体后凸成形术的现状及进展[J].中华全科医学,2014,12(4):625-627.
|
[2] |
王欢锋,费建平.老年患者经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术中静脉泵注瑞芬太尼临床麻醉观察[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2016,10(10):1399-1404.
|
[3] |
杨祚璋,谢琳,孙宇庆,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰部多椎体压缩性骨折的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2008,15(4):301-304.
|
[4] |
任虎,申勇,张英泽,等.影响经皮椎体后凸成形术椎体高度恢复的相关因素分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(1):47-51.
|
[5] |
杨增敏,佟兴业,杨军,等.经皮椎体成形术麻醉并发症的反思[J].临床骨科杂志,2015,18(6):757-758.
|
[6] |
Apan A,Cuva S,Apan O,et al.Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty:comparison with general anesthesia[J].Turk J Med Sci,2016,46(6):1801-1807.
|
[7] |
赵宗升,朱彩云.经皮椎体后凸成形术手术与麻醉配合[J].中国现代医生,2009,47(26):56-58.
|
[8] |
The Joanna Briggs Institute.Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers′Manual:2014edition[EB/OL].[2015-2016].http://www.joanna-briggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf.
|
[9] |
胡雁,李晓玲.循证护理的理论与实践[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007:30-40,74-78.
|
[10] |
郭静,杨改生.Narcotrend指导全身麻醉对患者麻醉苏醒时间影响的 Meta分析[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(1):61-67.
|
[11] |
刘俊,梁佳佳,杨光.不同麻醉方式用于高龄椎体后凸成形术患者围术期安全性对比[J].四川医学,2015,36(7):976-978.
|
[12] |
孙强,徐杰,邹雪琴,等.麻醉方式对椎体后凸成形术疗效影响的比较研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2010,16(1):34-38.
|
[13] |
张刚,王峙锦,陈恒毅,等.透视下精准局部麻醉在骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折PKP术中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(5):502-503.
|
[14] |
陈翔,邓明,黄晖,等.全麻或局麻行椎体后凸成型术的疗效对比研究[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2012,37(3):323-324.
|
[15] |
吴祥,钱列,贾永伟,等.全身麻醉与局部麻醉应用于经皮椎体后凸成形术的效果比较[J].现代实用医学,2011,23(11):1226-1228.
|
[16] |
屠华英.全麻或局麻行椎体后凸成形术的护理及疗效对比研究[J].医药前沿,2015,5(21):223-224.
|
[17] |
宋偲茂,熊小明,万趸,等.全麻下行经皮椎体后凸成形术的安全性和有效性探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(11):974-977.
|
[18] |
燕兴梅,安敏,夏瑞莲,等.脊柱外科微创手术的麻醉现状[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2016,48(7):816-818.
|
[19] |
王金华,任国海,童杰.过伸位下经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年人胸腰椎椎体压缩性骨折[J].骨科,2014,5(3):168-171.
|
[20] |
李朗明,盛炎炎.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效及影响因素[J].山西中医学院学报,2016,17(5):34-36.
|
|
|
|