|
|
Effect and safety of different doses of Mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids |
HUANG Yun-fu SHI Ling-ting LI Qiao-hua LIAO Hong-yuan |
Family Planning Service Center of Xingning Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Guangdong Province,Xingning 514500,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect and safety of Mifepristone at different doses in the treatment of uterine fibroids.Methods A total of 100 patients with uterine fibroids treated in Family Planning Service Center of Xingning Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangdong Province from January 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled in the study and divided into control group and study group according to the random number table method,with 50 cases in each group.In the control group,25.00 mg/d Mifepristone was used,while in the study group,12.50 mg/d Mifepristone was adopted.The volume of uterine fibroids,serum hormone levels,clinical control rate,and incidence of adverse reactions before and after treatment were compared between two groups.Results Before treatment,there were no significant differences between uterine fibroid volume([45.30±12.55]cm3),follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)([81.80±7.25]ug/L),luteinizing hormone(LH)([9.35±1.40]U/L),estradiol(E2)([276.65±21.65]pmol/L),progesterone(P)([7.80±1.45]nmol/L)in the study group and those respectively in the control group([45.35±12.50]cm3,[81.85±7.20]μg/L,[9.30±1.45]U/L,[276.60±21.60]pmol/L,[7.85±1.40]nmol/L)(P>0.05).After treatment,the uterine fibroid volume,FSH,LH,E2,and P in the study group were respectively(30.15±9.88)cm3,(6.33±1.29)μg/L,(8.08±1.21)U/L,(176.50±20.08)pmol/L,and(4.15±0.99)nmol/L,and in the control group they were respectively(30.03±9.25)cm3,(6.35±1.35)μg/L,(8.05±1.15)U/L,(175.90±21.55)pmol/L,and(4.10±0.95)nmol/L,which did not display statistical significance(P>0.05).The clinical control rate in the study group was 96.00%,which was higher than that in the control group accounting for 80.00%,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group(10.00%)was lower than that in the control group(38.00%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of 12.50 mg/d Mifepristone for uterine fibroids is effective and safe,which is worthy of promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
封全灵,熊祯祯,王智霆,等.米非司酮对孕激素受体M阳性子宫肌瘤细胞增殖、凋亡的影响[J].山东医药,2017,57(3):13-15.
|
[2] |
韩兆忠,刘茜,郑伟然,等.桂枝茯苓胶囊联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效和安全性的系统性评价[J].世界科学技术-中医药现代化,2016,18(3):543-551.
|
[3] |
方海娅,张海燕,寿华锋,等.米非司酮治疗围绝经期子宫肌瘤的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2016,32(11):987-989.
|
[4] |
陈燕娥,闫雪,钟业超,等.米非司酮联合桂枝茯苓对子宫肌瘤的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2016,32(15):1374-1377.
|
[5] |
朱杰华,陈喜悦,黄健,等.自拟消癥经验方内服联合米非司酮对子宫肌瘤患者子宫肌瘤体积和血清E2变化的影响[J].海南医学,2017,28(2):224-226.
|
[6] |
李黎明,杨艳,于静,等.活血化瘀方联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤 88 例[J].南京中医药大学学报,2015,31(4):334-336.
|
[7] |
黄婉怡,刘锦,周立蓉,等.桂枝茯苓胶囊联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤的临床观察[J].中国药房,2015,26(33):4641-4643.
|
[8] |
龚敏.米非司酮预防子宫肌瘤腹腔镜术后复发的临床效果及其影响因素[J].中国医师杂志,2016,18(11):1698-1700.
|
[9] |
康勤洪.不同剂量米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效比较[J].中国药业,2016,25(11):19-21,29.
|
[10] |
刘丽霞,管利.米非司酮联合桂枝茯苓胶囊治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效观察[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2016,16(7):946-948.
|
[11] |
陈娟.米非司酮联合中药宫瘤消对子宫肌瘤患者细胞因子和性激素水平影响研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(14):1428-1431.
|
[12] |
王波,陈国超.自拟方联合米非司酮对子宫肿瘤抑制效果及雌孕激素受体的影响[J].吉林中医药,2017,37(12):1222-1225.
|
[13] |
宋恩峰,张彩蝶,梅莎莎,等.小金胶囊联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤临床研究[J].世界中医药,2016,11(9):1773-1774,1778.
|
[14] |
丛小红,张玉梅,赵亚芹,等.子宫肌瘤剔除术后辅用米非司酮联合香棱丸加味对复发率及血清性激素的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2016,25(23):2556-2558.
|
[15] |
高玲,李红霞.米非司酮对子宫肌瘤组织SULT1E1和雌激素受体 α、β 受体蛋白的影响[J].医学综述,2016,22(12):2450-2452.
|
[16] |
徐丽,黄三秀.米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效及潜在机制分析[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(5):738-739.
|
[17] |
郭晋菊.米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤的临床研究[J].中国药物与临床,2017,17(1):32-34.
|
[18] |
涂雪松,胡利霞,李枫,等.桂枝茯苓胶囊联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤患者106例临床疗效研究[J].中国性科学,2016,25(10):42-44.
|
[19] |
周艳.中西医结合治疗子宫肌瘤50例临床观察[J].中国现代医生,2017,55(4):132-134.
|
[20] |
刘雪波,杨棋能.米非司酮联合宫瘤消胶囊治疗子宫肌瘤的效果观察[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(19):16-17.
|
[21] |
邹民,刘园香.不同剂量米非司酮对围绝经期子宫肌瘤患者肌瘤体积的影响[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(8):113-115.
|
[22] |
陈娟.米非司酮联合中药宫瘤消对子宫肌瘤患者细胞因子和性激素水平影响研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(14):1428-1431.
|
[23] |
韦云娟.米非司酮在子宫肌瘤治疗中的应用进展[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(17):160-162.
|
|
|
|