吻合器痔环切术联合痔核缝扎术治疗出血性重度痔的临床效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of procedurefor prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)combined with hemorrhoids ligation in the treatment of haemorrhagic severe hemorrhoids.Methods From June 2015 to December 2017,100 patients with haemorrhagic severe hemorrhoids treated in our hospital were selected as the subject,and divided into the study group and the control group by radom table method,with 50 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with PPH alone,and the patients in the study group were treated with PPH combined with hemorrhoid nuclear suture.The time of operation,the amount of blood lost during the operation,the time of hospitalization after operation,the pain score and the bleeding after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time in the study group was longer than that in the control group,and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the study group was larger than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage in the study group was 0%,which was significantly less than that in the control group (22%).The cure rate in the study group(90%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(72%),the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).The incidence of anal stricture and anal incontinence in the study group were 0.0%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group for 20.0%and 18.0%)(P＜0.05).Conclusion The effect of PPH combined with hemorrhoid nuclear ligation is better than that of the PPH alone,which should be promoted and extended.

Key words： Hemorrboids Procedurefor prolapse and hemorrhoids Hemorhoid ligatio Curative effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Xing-yi
	LIAO Ming
	LIANG Jia-ji
	PENG Xiao-chun

Cite this article:

CHEN Xing-yi,LIAO Ming,LIANG Jia-ji, et al. Clinical effect of procedurefor prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with hemorrhoids ligation in the treatment of haemorrhagic severe hemorrhoids[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(14): 51-53.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I14/51

[4]	陈祖清，陈松姬，石荣.痔核缝扎术式治疗混合痔临床分析[J].光明中医学，2011，26（5）：952-953.
[1]	杨向东，贺平，钱蒙，等.关于PPH技术的争论[J].结直肠肛门外，2014，20（3）：209-210.
[2]	孔凡东，何永忠，杜汉朋，等.手术治疗混合痔PPH术后吻合口狭窄疗效分析[J].山东医药，2013，53（38）：108.
[3]	李国文，曾山崎，陈转鹏，等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合Ligasure痔切除术治疗重度混合痔的疗效观察[J].中华临床医师杂志，2014，8（1）：44-47.
[5]	中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组，中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会，中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会等.痔临床诊治指南（2006版）[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2006，9（5）：461-463.
[6]	黄雪梅，魏健，张娇花，等.规范化疼痛干预对吻合器痔上黏膜环切术后疼痛的临床效果研究[J].中国医药导报，2013，10（25）：128-131.
[7]	韩华.吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与外剥内扎术治疗重度痔效果比较[J].中国处方药，2014，15（11）：117-118.
[8]	杨向东，贺平，钱蒙，等.关于PPH技术与传统手术的优劣之争[J].中国肛肠病杂志，2014，34（5）：209-210.
[9]	朱军，丁健华，赵克，等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术并发症分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2012，12（3）： 232-233.
[10]	陈二林，樊勇.吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗混合痔206 例[J].中华普通外科学文献，2017，11（15）：346-349.
[11]	谢启桂，黄启建.选择性痔上黏膜切除术联合部分痔核缝扎术治疗环状混合痔58例疗效观察[J].中华肛肠病杂志，2014，34（6）：78-79.
[12]	刘贺.PPH联合外痔切除术治疗环状混合痔并发症的防治[J].结直肠肛门外科，2013，19（1）：22-24.
[13]	周春华，任华，蔡维，等.吻合器痔上粘膜环形切除钉合术治疗重度混合痔的并发症分析[J].中华消化外科，2014，13（12）：964－966.
[14]	朱军，丁建华，赵克，等.吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合术与开放式外剥内扎痔切除术治疗度痔的远期疗效比较[J].中国实用外科，2012，32（5）：398－402.
[15]	周军，陈海亮，罗自通.PPH联合痔核缝扎术治疗出血性重度痔的临床疗效研究[J].结直肠肛门外科，2016，22（4）：339-343.