|
|
Comparison ofthe three differentmethods oflithotripsy under ureteroscope in treatment of ureteral calculi(length less than or equal to 1.0 cm)the effect of contrast |
SHI Chong-jun YANG Wei-zhong YAN Ji-yin DENG Jin-biao ZHANG Dong-jiang CAI Hua-ge |
Department of Urology,Third People's Hospital of Huizhou City in Guangdong Province,Huizhou 516002,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness of three different methods of lithotripsy under ureteroscope in treatment of ureteral calculi(length less than or equal to 1.0 cm).Methods From February 2015 to February 2017,169 cases of upper ureteral calculi(length less than or equal to 1.0 cm)treated in our hospital were selected as the research subjects,and divided into group A(60 cases),group B(52 cases)and group C(57 cases)according to a random table method.Group A was treated with ultrasonic lithotripsy,group B treated with ureteroscopic pneumatic ballistic lithotripsy,and group C was treated with holmium laser lithotripsy.The success rates,the rates of stone removal,the amount of bleeding in the operation,the time of postoperative hospitalization,and the incidences of complications of the three groups were compared.Results In group A and group C,the success rate of lithotripsy was higher than that in group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between group A and group C(P>0.05).The rate of stone exclusion in group A was higher than that in group B and group C,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The amount of bleeding in group A was less than that in group B and group C,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The time of hospitalization in group A was shorter than group B and group C,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in group A was lower than that in group B and group C,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference between group B and group C (P>0.05).Conclusion The upper ureteral calculi(length less than or equal to 1.0 cm)patients treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of ultrasound has high successful rate one time,with less bleeding,faster postoperative recovery and less complications and obvious advantages.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
郑云,祖雄兵,贺书云,等.经皮肾镜下超声气压弹道碎石清石系统与钬激光处理复杂性肾结石的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(1):24-27.
|
[2] |
陶宏平,赵伟平,朱扬进,等.经输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管多发结石的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(4):39-42.
|
[3] |
陈勇杰,张贤生.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石效果比较[J].山东医药,2016,56(37):87-89.
|
[5] |
赵明,胡忠春,张文才.经皮肾镜下超声气压弹道碎石机与钬激光碎石机在复杂性肾结石治疗中的应用研究[J].中国医学装备,2017,14(4):102-105.
|
[4] |
Taguchi M,Inoue T,Muguruma K,et al.Impact of loop-tail ureteral stents on ureteral stent-related symptoms immediately after ureteroscopic lithotripsy:comparison with pigtail ureteral stents[J].Investig Clin Urol,2017,58(6):440-446.
|
[6] |
何跃,奉友刚,何俊,等.经皮肾镜微通道气压弹道碎石和输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较[J].四川医学,2016,37(3):329-331.
|
[7] |
鲁成军,王亦农,田金波,等.三种微创碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(7):501-504.
|
[8] |
练文勇,汪利民,徐火松,等.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石临床观察[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(3):325-326.
|
[9] |
张师红.经输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效对比研究[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(12):1455-1456.
|
[10] |
章庆华,林谦,宋正尧,等.钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石患者感染的分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(12):2814-2816.
|
[11] |
Altay B,Erkurt B,Albayrak S.A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy[J].Lasers Med Sci,2017,32(7):1615-1619.
|
[12] |
黄跃胜,黄海鹏,朱心燊.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术对结石清除率术后并发症及临床疗效的影响[J].河北医学,2017,23(1):152-154.
|
[13] |
贺利明,张永升,屈卫星.钬激光碎石与气压弹道碎石治疗上尿路结石临床对比分析[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(4):410-412.
|
[14] |
何德显.输尿管结石患者的手术方案选择及碎石效果比较研究[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(4):384-386.
|
[15] |
赖在驰,范翰共,刘聪.两种碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较[J].海南医学,2017,28(15):2530-2532.
|
|
|
|