|
|
Clinical influence factor analysis of the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy |
MA Wen-bin JIANG Hong-hong GUO Shun-hua |
Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis,Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital,Guangzhou 510220,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical influence factors of the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.Methods Altogether 116 cases of patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were involved as the object of this experiment.The clinical data of 116 patients were analyzed retrospectively so as to explore the clinical influence factors of the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.Results Of the 116 patients,47 patients were identified as prostate cancer and the positive rate was 40.52%,and the positive rate was 57.58%in 2016,which was slightly higher than that in 2015(32.73%). The positive rate of prostate cancers who aged 47-54,55-59,60-69 and 70-79 years old,above 80 years old was 28.57%, 33.33%,39.58%,50.00%and 50.00%;with the increase of age,the positive rate of prostate cancers increased gradually. The positive rate of prostate cancers whose concentration of prostate specific antigen(PSA)ranged from 4-<10,10-<20, 20-<50,50-<100 to≥100 g/L was 33.33%,31.82%,35.71%,50.00%and 100.00%,respectively.With the increase of PSA concentration,the positive rate of prostate cancers increased gradually.The detection rate of prostate cancers with the prostate volume ranging from<20,20-<50,50-<80 to 80-100 ml was 31.25%,57.58%,38.00%and 23.53%,with significant difference between multiple groups(P<0.05).According to the multivariate Logistics regression analysis,it was found that the influencing factors of the detection rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate cancers mainly included age, PSA concentration and prostate volume.Conclusion Patients′age,PSA concentration and prostate volume may affect the positive rate of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy,therefore,it is recommended to exclude related interference factors when transrectal prostate biopsy is performed.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
徐洁,易照雄,陈颖,等.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术后出血护理相关因素[J].当代医学,2016,22(21):88-89.
|
[3] |
梁辉,孟晓敏.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术后出血护理相关因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2013,10(7):143-144,149.
|
[4] |
陈建刚,陈新凤,顾栋华,等.建立一种简易评分系统预测前列腺穿刺活检前列腺癌阳性率[J].中华男科学杂志,2015,21(1):53-56.
|
[2] |
Yoo DH,Cho JY,Kwak C,et al.Transabdominal high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy of the prostate and determination of the protective effect of rectal cooling:an experimental study using canine prostates[J].J Ultrasound Med,2013,32(8):1419-1425.
|
[5] |
丁雪飞,张立国,周广臣,等.模板定位下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检在经直肠途径初次活检阴性患者检查中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(4):298-300.
|
[6] |
李秋洋,唐杰,李岩密,等.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检临床分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2014,11 (11):13-16.
|
[7] |
Mohamed ZK,Dominguez-Escrig J,VasdevN,etal.The prognostic value of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in patients over 70 years old with a prostate specific Antigen (PSA) level≤15 ng/mland normaldigitalrectal examination:a 10-year prospective follow-up study of 427 consecutive patients[J].Urologic Oncol,2013,31(8):1489-1496.
|
[8] |
常莹,杨敬春,王萍.多模态经直肠超声检查在引导前列腺癌靶向性穿刺活检中的应用[J].中国医药科学,2015,5 (5):27-29.
|
[9] |
王艳青,董柏君,黄吉炜,等.前列腺初次穿刺活检阳性的预测因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2016,37(1):38-42. [10]刘云飞,姜文弟,任冰,等.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检并发症分析及处理[J].临床超声医学杂志,2016,18(9):643-645.
|
[11] |
李红星,高宛生,杨彦峰,等.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术后全身炎症反应综合征的危险因素[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2016,21(5):353-356.
|
[12] |
莫晓东,李纲,孙军,等.前列腺穿刺活检患者血清高敏C反应蛋白与Gleason评分的相关性[J].江苏医药,2013,39(5):540-543.
|
[13] |
齐小康,丁雪飞,周广臣,等.经会阴前列腺穿刺活检漏诊原因分析(附4例报告)[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(8):643-645.
|
[14] |
宋刚,方冬,纪光杰,等.55岁以内患者前列腺穿刺临床病理特征分析[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(40):3218-3221.
|
[15] |
陈锐,谢立平,周利群,等.中国前列腺癌联盟成员医院前列腺穿刺活检现状的调查报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2015,36(5):342-345.
|
[16] |
王娟霞,王志平.经直肠超声引导下的前列腺活检术后感染相关并发症的研究进展[J].医学综述,2016,22(4):726-729.
|
|
|
|