Diagnostic value of different test methods in bacterial vaginitis
LU Wen-shen1 MO Yun-jun1 CAI Xi-jin1 ZHANG Xiu-ming2▲
1. Department of Medical Inspection, People′s Hospital of Luohu District in Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518001, China；
2. Medical Inspection Center, Luohu Medical Group of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province,Shenzhen 518001, China
Abstract：Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of different test methods in bacterial vaginitis. Methods A total of 150 patients with suspected bacterial vaginitis admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People′s Hospital of Luohu District in Shenzhen City, from January to June, 2018, were selected as research objects. Bacterial vaginitis rapid detection method, lactic acid bacillus detection method, pH detection method and amine test detection method were used to detect the vaginal secretions of patients. The detection rate, sensitivity and specificity of the four methods were compared. Results The detection rate, sensitivity and specificity of the bacterial vaginitis rapid detection method were higher than those of lactic acid bacillus detection method, pH detection method and amine test detection method, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion In the bacterial vaginitis test, the bacterial vaginitis rapid detection method should be given priority, the clinical test effect is remarkable and has high clinical application value.
卢文深; 莫云钧; 蔡锡金; 张秀明. 不同检验方法在细菌性阴道炎中的诊断价值[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(16): 193-196.
LU Wen-shen; MO Yun-jun; CAI Xi-jin; ZHANG Xiu-ming. Diagnostic value of different test methods in bacterial vaginitis. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(16): 193-196.
京公网安备 11010502046607号