Abstract：Objective To explore the value of microcolumn gel immunoassay for identifying clinical blood type and ensuring blood transfusion safety. Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent transfusion therapy from February 2017 to February 2019 in Fengcheng People′s Hospital and Zhangshu People′s Hospital were enrolled in the study.According to the random number table method, they were divided into the saline test tube method group (50 cases) and the microcolumn gel immunoassay group ( 50 cases).The saline test tube method was detected by saline test tube method group, and the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was detected by microcolumn gel immunoassay group.The positive and negative stereotypes, positive and negative stereotypes, cross-matching success rate, cross-matching failure rate, false positive rate, detection sensitivity, specificity, transfusion accident rate and blood transfusion service quality score data indicators were compared between the two detection methods. Results There were no significant differences in the positive and negative conformity rates and positive and negative stereotypes of the two detection methods (P＞0.05).The cross-matching success rate of microcolumn gel immunoassay of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was higher than that of the saline test tube method, there was statistically significant difference (P＜0.05).The crossmatching failure rate of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was lower than that of the saline test tube method,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the detection sensitivity and specificity of the examination method between the microcolumn gel immunoassay method and saline test tube method(P＞0.05).The blood transfusion service quality score of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was higher than that of the saline test tube method, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of transfusion accidents in the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was lower than that in the saline test tube method, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Microcolumn gel immunoassay identification method can effectively reduce the incidence of transfusion accidents and improve the quality of blood transfusion services.
钟清兰； 朱小艳； 敖四珍； 叶锦华. 微柱凝胶免疫检测技术鉴定临床血型及保证输血安全的价值[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(15): 183-185转202.
ZONG Qing-lan； ZHU Xiao-yan； AO Si-zhen； YE Jin-hua. Value of microcolumn gel immunoassay technology in the identification of clinical blood types and ensuring the safety of blood transfusion. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(15): 183-185转202.
京公网安备 11010502046607号