防旋股骨近端髓内钉在老年髋部骨折中的应用

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (13)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (42 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨防旋股骨近端髓内钉在老年髋部骨折中的应用。方法选取2018年1月～2019年2月江苏省宿迁市工人医院和广州市红十字会医院骨科收治的90例老年髋部骨折患者作为研究对象，按照等距随机抽样法分为对照组（45例）与观察组（45例）。对照组采取股骨近端锁定钢板治疗，观察组采取防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗。比较两组的围术期指标（手术时间、术中出血量、透视时间、血红蛋白丢失量、离床活动时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间），记录两组的Harris评分、优良率、生存质量评分、Barthel指数、并发症总发生率。结果观察组的手术时间、离床活动时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间短于对照组，术中出血量、血红蛋白丢失量少于对照组，透视时间长于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术前的Harris评分、生存质量评分、Barthel指数比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组术后6个月的Harris评分、生存质量评分、Barthel指数均高于术前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组术后6个月的Harris评分、生存质量评分、Barthel指数均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组的优良率高于对照组，并发症总发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论在老年髋部骨折治疗中，防旋股骨近端髓内钉更有利于手术的进行，能够促进髋关节功能恢复，可以提高生存质量及日常生活自理能力，降低并发症总发生率，值得推广应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	周大方
	徐建
	王迎
	纪兆晓
	杜峥
	宗浩
	叶睿
	王敏

关键词 ：老年髋部骨折, 防旋股骨近端髓内钉, 股骨近端锁定钢板, Harris评分, Barthel指数

Abstract：Objective To investigate the application of anti-rotation proximal femoral nail in elderly hip fracture.Methods A total of 90 elderly patients with hip fractures who were admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics of Suqian Workers Hospital of Jiangsu Province and Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital from January 2018 to February 2019 were selected as the study objects.They were divided into the control group (45 cases) and the observation group (45 cases) according to the isometric random sampling method.The control group was treated with proximal femoral locking plate, and the observation group was treated with anti-rotation proximal femoral nail.The perioperative indexes such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, perspective time, hemoglobin loss, time of bed movement, fracture healing time, length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared.The Harris score, excellent and good rate, quality of life score, Barthel index and the total incidence of complications of the two groups were recorded.Results The operation time, time of bed movement, fracture healing time, and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, the intraoperative blood loss and hemoglobin loss in the observation group were less than those in the control group, and the fluoroscopy time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in theHarris score, quality of life score and Barthel index before operation (P＞0.05).The Harris score, quality of life score and Barthel index of the two groups at 6 months after operation were higher than those before operation, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The Harris score, quality of life score and Barthel index of the observation group at 6 months after operation were higher than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The excellent and good rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly, the proximal femoral nail of the anti-rotation femur is more conducive to the operation, promote the recovery of hip function, improve the quality of life and self-careability of daily life, and reduce the total incidence of complications.It is worthy of popularization and application.

Key words： Elderly hip fracture Anti-rotation proximal femoral nail Proximal femoral locking plate Harris score;Basel index

基金资助:广东省广州市科技计划重大项目（201607010009）

引用本文:

周大方; 徐建; 王迎; 纪兆晓; 杜峥; 宗浩; 叶睿; 王敏. 防旋股骨近端髓内钉在老年髋部骨折中的应用[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(12): 80-83.
ZHOU Da-fang; XU Jian; WANG Ying; JI Zhao-xiao; DU Zheng; ZONG Hao; YE Rui; WANG Min. Application of anti-rotation proximal femoral nail in elderly hip fracture. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(12): 80-83.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2020/V27/I12/80

[1]	刘奕宁，李晓彬，郭建邦.不同体位下防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J].岭南急诊医学杂志，2016，21（6）：597-598，607.
[2]	左思力.半髋关节置换和股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗高龄患者髋部骨折的风险评估[J].中国组织工程研究，2019，23（28）：4440-4445.
[3]	丁涛，张保焜，田少奇，等.老年髋部骨折手术方法的选择原则及应用现状[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2018，32（11）：1435-1440.
[4]	徐锴，李开南.三种内固定固定股骨转子间六部分骨折各分型稳定性的有限元分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2019，21（4）：345-352.
[5]	陈健，左才红，张财义，等.解剖型髓内钉和股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较[J].北京大学学报（医学版），2019，51（2）：283-287.
[6]	Kammerlander C，Hem ES，Klopfer T，et al.Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation （PFNA）—a multicentre randomized controlled trial[J].Injury，2018，49（8）：1436-1444.
[7]	汪洋，彭家全，唐春江，等.防旋转股骨近端髓内钉与人工关节置换治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的比较[J].重庆医学，2018，47（20）：2706-2708，2713.
[8]	Imerci A，Aydogan NH，Tosun K.A comparison of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral fail antirotation in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures[J].Acta Orthop Belg，2018，84（2）：123-131.
[9]	王勇，潘骏.标准骨水泥强化型PFNA 治疗老年股骨粗隆间不稳定骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2018，26（18）：1653-1658.
[10]	朱卫洁，王晓芳，申友亮，等.早期闭合复位PFNA 内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2018，26（6）：520-523.
[11]	王一新，吴相桥，杜辉君，等.两种手术方式治疗老年人不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折失血量的比较[J].中华老年医学杂志，2018，37（1）：71-73.
[12]	张杰荣，熊时喜，田晓林，等.股骨近端解剖型锁定加压钢板和防旋型髓内钉内固定修复股骨转子下长段粉碎性骨折：非随机对照临床研究[J].中国组织工程研究，2019，23（16）：2493-2499.
[13]	吴斗，任鹏宇，梁伟，等.老年股骨近端髓腔形态差异及其对股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定疗效的影响[J].中华创伤杂志，2018，34（6）：513-520.
[14]	邓煜，白新文，漆伟.髋关节置换结合股骨近端重建与PFNA 治疗老年转子间骨折疗效对比[J].重庆医学，2019，48（11）：1831-1835.
[15]	孟庆奇，崔树廷，梁伟国，等.DHS、PFNA、半髋关节置换术治疗老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折的疗效对比[J].实用医学杂志，2019，35（7）：1036-1039，1043.
[16]	郑强.PFNA 与人工股骨头置换术治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果评价[J].中国急救医学，2018，38（Z1）：249.