不同材质洁布对医院高频接触表面清洁效果的比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (425 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的提高医院高频接触表面清洁效果,减少医院相关感染的发生。方法 2016年11~12月取选我院妇产科、骨科、普外科高频接触的键盘、门把手、电话机、微泵、床头铃和床栏等60个物体表面作为研究对象,分别用三种不同材质洁布对这些物体表面进行清洁,并在清洁前后采样。结果消毒湿巾、超纤维毛巾、棉质毛巾细菌清除率依次为93.9%、92.4%和65.2%, 清洁后的物体表面符合环境卫生标准合格率依次是100%、95%和30%,消毒湿巾和超纤维毛巾的清洁效果优于棉质毛巾,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,消毒湿巾与超纤维毛巾对物体表面细菌清除率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论消毒湿巾和超纤维毛巾对物体表面均具有良好的清洁效果,但消毒湿巾的性价比远低于超纤维毛巾,因此在洁布的选择方面超纤维毛巾是最佳的。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	熊惠萍
	李慧琴
	周莲英
	于忠霞

关键词 ：不同材质洁布, 高频接触物体表面, 清洁效果

Abstract：Objective To improve the cleaning effect of high-frequency contact surface in the hospital and reduce the incidence of hospital-related infection.Methods From November to December 2016,60 surfaces including keyboard,door handle,telephone,micro pump,bedside bell and bed bar,etc.from departments of gynaecology and obstetrics,orthopedics,and general surgery were selected as research objects.The surfaces were cleaned by the cloths with three different materials and samples were collected before and after cleaning.Results The bacterial clearance rates of disinfecting wipe,microfiber towel,and cotton towel was 93.9%,92.4% and 65.2% respectively,and the qualified rate meeting the hygienic standard after cleaning was 100%,95% and 30% accordingly,and the cleaning effect of disinfecting wipe and microfiber towel were better than that by cotton towel (P<0.05).The bacterial clearance rate was not displayed statistical difference in disinfecting wipe and microfiber towel (P>0.05).Conclusion Both disinfecting wipe and microfiber towel obtain favorable cleaning effect,but the cost performance of disinfecting wipe is much lower than that of the microfiber towel,so microfiber towel is the best choice.

Key words： Clean cloths with different materials High-frequency contact surface Cleaning effect

收稿日期: 2017-05-22

PACS:

R194.4

基金资助:江西省南昌市指导性科技计划项目（洪科发计字【2016】223号第40项）

作者简介: 熊惠萍（1970-）,江西南昌人,本科,副主任护师,现任院感科主任,研究方向：医院感染控制

引用本文:

熊惠萍, 李慧琴, 周莲英, 于忠霞. 不同材质洁布对医院高频接触表面清洁效果的比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(24): 124-126.
XIONG Hui-ping, LI Hui-qin, ZHOU Lian-ying, YU Zhong-xia. Comparison of cleaning effect of clean cloth with different materials on high-frequency contact surface of the hospital. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(24): 124-126.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2017/V24/I24/124

[1]	范文,黄娥,段六生,等.医务人员手卫生与洗手依从性现状及管理对策[J].中华院感染学杂志,2011,21（9）：1845.
[2]	Garrett JH Jr.A review of the CDC recommendations for prevention of HAIs in outpatient settings[J].AORN J,2015, 101（5）：519-525.
[3]	胡必杰,倪晓平,覃金艾,等.医院环境物体表面与消毒最佳实践[M].上海：上海科技技术出版社,2012：20-21.
[4]	倪晓平,武迎宏,陆群,等.《医疗机构环境表面清洁与消毒管理规范》WS/T512-2016[Z].
[5]	胡国庆,邓小虹,张流波,等.《医院消毒卫生标准》GB15982-2012[Z].
[6]	北京市卫生防疫站.卫生防疫微生物检验操作规程[M].北京：北京出版社,1991.
[7]	Zimnicki KM.Preoperative teaching and stoma marking in an inpatient population：a quality improvement process using a FOCUS-Plan-Do-Check-Act mode[J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2015,42（2）：165-169.
[8]	黄银波,李兴根,乔勇升,等.高效液相色谱法测定消毒湿巾中苯扎氯铵的含量[J].理化检验-化学分册,2012,48（4）：400-401.
[9]	顾福萍,蒋培余,徐伯赢,等.大肠埃希菌多药耐药株对常用消毒剂的抗力实验观察[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009, 19（10）：1228-1230.
[10]	Russell AD.Bacterial adaptation and resistance to antiseptics,disinfectants and preservatives is not a new phenomenon[J].J Hosp Infect,2004,57（2）：97-104.
[11]	胡蓉.超细复合纤维及其在清洁方面的应用研究[J].陕西纺织,2007,（1）：47-48.
[12]	王英红,徐虹,倪小平.细微纤维布在医院环境清洁中的应用于研究进展[J].浙江预防医学,2016,28（5）：480-482.
[13]	Rutala WA,Gergen MF,Weber DJ.Microbiologic evaluation of microfiber mops for surface disinfection [J].Am J Infect Control,2007,35（9）：569-573.
[14]	USEPA.Using Microfiber Mops in Hospitals.Environmental Best Practices for Health Facilities[EB/OL].2002,11.http：//www.epa.gov/region9/waste/p2/projects/hospital/mops.pdf
[15]	帕孜来提·玉素甫.医院常规环境卫生监测对医院感染率的影响[J].现代妇女：医学前沿,2013,（1）：267-268.