|
|
Application comparison of different approaches in left extrahepatic lobectomy |
WU Zhao-ping JIN Yu-dong PENG Lang XIONG Ri-hui HU Qiu-ling |
The First Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, Jiujiang 332000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effect of different approaches in left extrahepatic lobectomy. Methods A total of 82 patients who needed to undergo left extrahepatic lobotomy in the First People′s Hospital of Jiujiang City from March 2017 to April 2020 were selected as the research subjects. According to random number table method, they were divided into group A and group B, with 41 cases in each group. Group A used the first hepatic portal approach, and group B used the transhepatic round ligament approach. The operation-related indexes, traumatic stress index before and 1 d after operation, liver function (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], hepatocyte growth factor [HGF]) before and 3 months after operation were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in group B was lower than that in group A, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 1 day after surgery, the levels of adrenaline, interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol (Cor) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the groups were higher than those before surgery, and the levels of adrenaline, IL-6, Cor and PCT in group B were lower than those in group A, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 3 months after surgery, the levels of ALT, AST and TBil in the groups were lower than those before surgery, while the levels of HGF and ALB were higher than thise before surgery, and the level of HGF in group B was higher than that in group A, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 3 months after operation, there were no statistically significant differences in ALT, AST, TBil and ALB levels between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the first hepatic portal approach, the transhepatic round ligament fissure approach can reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing left extrahepatic lobectomy and promote the recovery of liver function.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
凌新建,汪东树.腹腔镜下左肝外叶切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的临床效果[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(8):1506-1509.
|
[2] |
彭沙沙,郭浚,裴斐,等.腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术中经肝断面胆道镜探查取石治疗肝胆管结石的临床研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(11):1357-1360.
|
[3] |
邢人伟,聂寒秋,张阳,等.腹腔镜与开腹左肝外叶切除术治疗左肝外叶胆管结石疗效对比[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2019,31(7):425-427.
|
[4] |
靳斌,杜刚,李佳,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术的临床应用体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(10):765-769.
|
[5] |
肖卫星,周海军,陈炳荣,等.胆道镜钬激光碎石术联合肝叶切除术治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2020,32(2):71-74.
|
[6] |
陈建武.左肝蒂阻断行左半肝微创手术治疗肝内胆管结石疗效研究[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2018,21(1):131-132.
|
[7] |
司爽,杨志英,谭海东,等.模式化腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术治疗肝血管瘤的临床应用(附44 例报告)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(5):333-336.
|
[8] |
梁勇,母齐鸣,万波,等.基于肝解剖结构腹腔镜2 步分层法左外叶肝切除术的疗效及安全性[J].肝脏,2020,25(5):528-530.
|
[9] |
王保起.左肝外叶切除联合胆道镜治疗左肝内胆管结石的疗效观察[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015,27(2):135-137.
|
[10] |
李越华,魏东,王琨,等.腹腔镜与开腹左肝外叶切除联合胆道镜取石治疗左肝内胆管结石的疗效比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2015,24(8):1070-1076.
|
[11] |
孙科,肖宏,陈安平,等.肝圆韧带入路在腹腔镜再次胆道取石术中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(2):160-164.
|
[12] |
吴泓,谢坤林,黄纪伟,等.经肝圆韧带裂入路肝切除术的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(1):53-57.
|
[13] |
孙增鹏,彭创,易为民,等.肝圆韧带途径在肝门胆管良性狭窄中的应用[J].中华普通外科杂志,2019,34(5):381-383.
|
[14] |
梁荔,冯宪光,袁方水,等.经肝圆韧带途径肝门下降法在腹腔镜胆管结石再手术中的应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2020,23(8):618-620,627.
|
[15] |
谭文勇,罗强,何平,等.不同入路下行左肝外叶切除术对机体创伤应激反应程度及残余肝功能影响[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2018,25(1):44-48.
|
|
|
|