|
|
Effect comparison of Sevoflurane and Propofol during recovery period of deep anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery under Narcotrend monitoring |
ZENG Liang-liang ZHONG Bao-qiong WANG Ri-lian |
Department of Anesthesiology,Liaobu Hospital of Dongguan City,Guangdong Province,Dongguan 523400,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol during the recovery period of deep anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery under Narcotrend monitoring.Methods The clinical data of 60 patients receiving general or gynecological laparoscopic surgery under Narcotrend monitoring in Liaobu Hospital of Dongguan City,Guangdong Province from January to August,2020 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into Sevoflurane group(28 cases)and Propofol group(32 cases)according to the different drugs used in deep anesthesia.Sevoflurane group was given Sevoflurane and Remifentanil to maintain anesthesia,while Propofol group was given Propofol and Remifentanil to maintain anesthesia.Hemodynamic indexes,functional recovery time,visual analogue scale(VAS)score,maximum Ricker calming agitation score and 24 h recovery quality(QOR-40)score were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)between the two groups before operation and during the recovery period(P>0.05).The recovery time of spontaneous respiration,breathing and eye-opening time,extubation time,and recovery time of orientation in the Propofol group were shorter than those in the Sevoflurane group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).VAS score and maximum Ricker sedative agitation score in the Propofol group were lower than those in the Sevoflurane group,and QOR-40 score was higher than that in the Sevoflurane group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Under Narcotrend monitoring,the effect of Propofol and Sevoflurane in laparoscopic deep anesthesia is relatively stable.The recovery time in the recovery period of deep anesthesia with Propofol is shorter,the recovery quality is higher,the patients′restlessness is less,the pain level is lower,and it is more conducive to the functional recovery of patients after awakening.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
张建文,王保国.麻醉镇痛深度监测的研究进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2018,34(3):302-304.
|
[2] |
黄梅.Narcotrend脑电意识深度监测在小儿日间手术全身麻醉中的应用[J].中国医药科学,2020,10(1):227-229,242.
|
[3] |
肖慧,高钰琳,丁宁.术中麻醉深度监测对腹部手术患者PACU谵妄发生和护理质量提升的影响[J].广东医学,2018,39(21):3292-3294.
|
[4] |
张昆,夏建国.咪唑安定与右美托咪定对全麻严重烧伤切痂植皮术患者苏醒期躁动影响的比较[J].中国医药科学,2018,8(19):24-27.
|
[5] |
魏颖,刘颖新,杨学伟,等.右美托咪定对腹腔镜下全结肠切除患者全麻苏醒期的影响[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2019,25(2):151-154.
|
[6] |
王英姿,彭志勇,殷爽,等.右美托咪定复合腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜微创手术麻醉恢复质量的影响[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2018,39(1):13-17.
|
[7] |
郑丽,怀晓蓉,顾娟,等.术前静脉注射酒石酸布托啡诺对鼻内镜手术患者全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J].上海医学,2018,41(5):293-298.
|
[8] |
郑卫国,程南,张晶,等.全麻联合硬膜外麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者肺部感染及应激反应的影响[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(10):1522-1525,1562.
|
[9] |
郑民华,马君俊,吴超.微创外科近20年进展及未来发展趋势[J].中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(1):23-26,32.
|
[10] |
王英姿,彭志勇,殷爽,等.七氟烷或丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼全麻对腹腔镜手术患者麻醉苏醒期的影响[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2016,10(21):3185-3189.
|
[11] |
李冬,严虹,杭燕南,等.七氟醚或丙泊酚维持麻醉对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后疼痛的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(3):253-256.
|
[12] |
罗欢欢,陈文雅,陈然.鼻内镜全麻手术患者术毕Narcotrend指导下泵入丙泊酚对患者苏醒质量的影响[J].中国临床研究,2018,31(1):108-111.
|
[13] |
赵玉潮,熊莉,余得水,等.丙泊酚静脉全麻和七氟醚吸入全麻对成人腹部肿瘤术后ED的影响[J].西南国防医药,2020,30(5):437-440.
|
[14] |
李冬,张晓庆.七氟醚和丙泊酚对患者术后疼痛的影响及其镇痛机制研究进展[J].外科研究与新技术,2017,6(2):128-132.
|
[15] |
王晓阁.丙泊酚临床应用进展[J].天津药学,2019,31(1):67-70.
|
[16] |
顾娟娟,杨静,袁维秀,等.丙泊酚中枢麻醉作用机制的研究进展[J].海军医学杂志,2017,38(1):96-98.
|
[17] |
周本健,罗琼,罗放.Narcotrend监测下七氟醚和丙泊酚全麻苏醒期特征比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(4):366-368.
|
|
|
|