|
|
Screening of protective agent formula for freezing and vacuum drying process of Streptococcus pneumoniae type 4 strain |
HAO Yi-nan1 ZHANG Jing-jing1 GUO Bing-feng2 WANG Ming-hua1 WANG Ya-ping1 WANG Bin3▲ |
1.Research and Development Center,Hualan Bioengineering Co.,Ltd.,He′nan Province,Xinxiang 453003,China;
2.Department of Blood Preparations Research and Development,Hualan Bioengineering Co.,Ltd.,He′nan Province,Xinxiang 453003,China;
3.Department of Quality Control,Hualan Genetic Engineering Co.,Ltd.,He′nan Province,Xinxiang 453000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To screen the formula of the protective agent for the freezing and vacuum drying process of Streptococcus pneumoniae type 4 strain through orthogonal experiments,and to analyze the activity,genetic stability and growth characteristics of the strains under the formula,and find the long-term and stable freeze-dried protective agent formulation.Methods Streptococcus pneumoniae type 4 strain was selected as the test strain.The survival rate of the strain before and after freeze-drying was used as an evaluation index.The freeze-dried protective agent formula was determined by using a three-factor orthogonal test.After freeze-drying,the activity,genetic stability and growth characteristics of the bacteria under the formula were analyzed.Results Through orthogonal experiment,the best freeze-drying protective agent formula was determined as:5% skimmed milk powder+10% trehalose+10% sodium glutamate.The concentration of the bacterial solution before lyophilization was 2.35×108 cfu/mL.After lyophilization,the strains were stored for different times(after lyophilization,storage 90,180,360 days)to test their activity,genetic stability,and growth characteristics.The activities were 81.2%,80.4%,80.1% and 79.8%.The homology analysis was 100%,and there was no difference in growth characteristics.This formulation compatible with types of 6A,18C and 19F Streptococcus pneumoniae also have good protection under the freeze-vacuum drying process,and the survival rate of the three batches of samples at day 0 was all above 78%.Conclusion After the optimization of the freeze-dried protective agent formulation,the survival rate and stability of the strains maintain a high level,and the formulation process can be used for freeze-vacuum drying and storage of different serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae,providing stable and reliable strains for the production of Streptococcus pneumoniae polysaccharide vaccines.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Yau B,Hunt NH,Mitchell AJ,et al.Blood-Brain Barrier Pathology and CNS Outcomes in Streptococcus pneumoniae Meningitis[J].Int J Mol Sci,2018,19(11):3555-3577.
|
[2] |
Loughran AJ,Orihuela CJ,Tuomanen EI.Streptococcus pneumoniae:Invasion and Inflammation[J].Microbiol Spectr,2019,7(2):10.1128.
|
[3] |
Engholm DH,Kilian M,Goodsell DS,et al.A visual review of the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae[J].FEMS Microbiol Rev,2017,41(6):854-879.
|
[4] |
Paton JC,Trappetti C.Streptococcus pneumoniae Capsular Polysaccharide[J].Microbiol Spectr,2019,7(2):304-315.
|
[5] |
Skov Srensen UB,Yao K,Yang Y,et al.Capsular Polysaccharide Expression in Commensal Streptococcus Species:Genetic and Antigenic Similarities to Streptococcus pneumoniae[J].mBio,2016,7(6):1-17.
|
[6] |
Suárez N,Texeira E.Optimal Conditions for Streptococcus pneumoniae Culture:In Solid and Liquid Media[J].Methods Mol Biol,2019,1968:3-10.
|
[7] |
Peiren J,Buyse J,De Vos P,et al.Improving survival and storage stability of bacteria recalcitrant to freeze-drying:a coordinated study by European culture collections[J].Appl Microbiol Biotechnol,2015,99(8):3559-3571.
|
[8] |
Bellali S,Bou Khalil J,Fontanini A,et al.A new protectant medium preserving bacterial viability after freeze drying[J].Microbiol Res,2020,236(6):126454
|
[9] |
Marcial-Coba MS,Cieplak T,CahúTB,et al.Viability of microencapsulated Akkermansia muciniphila and Lactobacillus plantarum during freeze-drying,storage and in vitro simulated upper gastrointestinal tract passage[J].Food Funct,2018,9(11):5868-5879.
|
[10] |
Lakshminarayana TS,Madhusudhan B.Statistical modelling for optimized lyophilization of Lactobacillus acidophilus strains for improved viability and stability using response surface methodology[J].AMB Express,2018,8(1):1-11.
|
[12] |
王丹敏,吴胜吉,吴玉秀,等.肺炎链球菌几种保存方法的比较[J].中华医学研究杂志,2006,6(1):88-89.
|
[11] |
Boileau MJ,Mani R,Clinkenbeard KD.Lyophilization of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus 109J for Long-Term Storage[J].Curr Protoc Microbiol,2017,45(7B.3):1-15.
|
[13] |
Chen H,Tian M,Chen L,et al.Optimization of composite cryoprotectant for freeze-drying Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01 by response surface methodology[J].Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol,2019,47(1):1559-1569.
|
[14] |
Dianawati D,Mishra V,Shah NP.Survival of Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria after Processing and during Storage:A Review[J].Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr,2016,56(10):1685-1716.
|
[15] |
Ren H,Zentek J,Vahjen W.Optimization of Production Parameters for Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains as Feed Additive[J].Molecules,2019,24(18):1-17.
|
[16] |
Chen H,Chen S,Li C,et al.Response surface optimization of lyoprotectant for Lactobacillus bulgaricus during vacuum freeze-drying[J].Prep Biochem Biotechnol,2015,45(5):463-475.
|
[17] |
Stefanello RF,Nabeshima EH,Iamanaka BT,et al.Survival and stability of Lactobacillus fermentum and Wickerhamomyces anomalus strains upon lyophilisation with different cryoprotectant agents[J].Food Res Int,2019,115(1):90-94.
|
|
|
|