|
|
Application of awake tracheal intubation under video laryngoscope in emergency operation of full stomach patients |
LIU Chang-wei1 LIU Fei-rong1 XUE Song2 HE Chun-cong1 LIU Jun1 |
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Dongguan Guangji Hospital
2. Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Dongguan Guangji Hospital |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application of awake tracheal intubation under video laryngoscope in emergency operation of full stomach patients. Methods A total of 56 patients in Dongguan Guangji Hospital who needed emergency surgery under general anesthesia with awake endotracheal intubation (intubation) due to full stomach were selected as study subjects. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into the video laryngoscope(VL) group (28 cases) and the fiberbronchoscope (FOB) group (28 cases). The VL group underwent plastic intubation with tracheal tube core under video laryngoscopy, and the FOB group underwent fiberoptic bronchoscope to guide the intubation. The intubation time, the first-pass success rate of tracheal intubation, the score of patient cooperation, the score of satisfaction with intubation during follow-up within 24 hours after anesthesia, and the incidence of adverse reactions during intubation were compared between the two groups. Results VL group′s intubation time was shorter than FOB group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the first-pass success rate of intubation, patient cooperation score, follow-up satisfaction score, and total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For full-stomach patients undergoing awake endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia, compared with bronchoscope-guided intubation, video laryngoscope intubation could shorten the intubation time, and the success rate of one intubation, the degree of patient cooperation and intubation satisfaction are comparable, without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions to intubation.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
许亚超,薛富善,杨泉涌,等.瑞芬太尼抑制患者清醒气管插管反应的半数有效剂量[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2008,28(10):873-876.
|
[2] |
马武华,代文杰,王勇.广东省困难气道管理调查分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,11(30):1072-1076.
|
[3] |
李芳,王烨,邓晓明.视频喉镜的临床进展[J].医学综述.2017,23(3):544-548.
|
[4] |
王德勇,李健,陈军.GlideScope 可视喉镜在不明原因呼吸道感染患者气管插管中的应用[J].江苏医药,2018,44(9):1041-1043.
|
[5] |
沈社良,胡双飞.右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼用于纤维支气管镜引导经鼻清醒气管插管效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2011,31(11):1306-1309.
|
[6] |
李慧娴,薛富善,刘亚洋,等.C-MAC 视频喉镜在成年患者气道管理中的应用[J].医学综述,2018,24(19):3897-3903.
|
[7] |
李慧娴,薛富善,刘亚洋.气道管理中应用视频喉镜的优势和技术要点[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2017,38(9):769-772.
|
[8] |
薛富善.改善危重症患者气管插管安全的策略[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2018,32(2):105-108.
|
[9] |
王烨,温超,邓晓明,等.不同弯曲度导管芯用于Tosight视频喉镜气管插管的比较[J].临床麻醉学志,2014,30(7):659-662.
|
[10] |
郝小芳,高学,张梁,等.两种不同角度的McGrath 喉镜行气管插管的对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2019,18(9):952-956.
|
[11] |
鲁婷,于颖颖,孙杰,等.探讨头高位联合托下颌改良快顺序诱导插管的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020, 36(5):437-440.
|
[12] |
屈伸,朱虹,陈易.自制咽喉喷药器在喉镜引导下清醒气管插管的临床观察[J].宁夏医学杂志,2016,38(3):274-275.
|
[13] |
王志,董源洪,陈振毅.光棒和视频喉镜经口气管插管心血管反应的比较[J].上海医学,2019,42(9):566-567.
|
[14] |
Rajan S,Kadapamannil D,Barua K,et al.Ease of intubation and hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope with D blade:A comparison with use of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope[J].J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2018,34(3):381-385.
|
[15] |
魏国华,刘存明,孙晓迪.右美托咪定复合芬太尼在急诊肠梗阻患者清醒气管插管中的应用[J].江苏医药,2019,45(7):695-697.
|
[16] |
计超,严佳,姜虹.右美托咪定或瑞芬太尼联合表面麻醉用于清醒气管插管术的安全性:meta 分析[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2016,36(10):1243-1246.
|
[17] |
张亚菲,李墅明,杨建军,等.气管插管全麻术后咽痛的研究进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(5):510-513.
|
[18] |
王磊,安洁,邓晓明,等.Tosight 视频喉镜气管插管对术后咽喉痛的影响[J].北京医学,2019,41(1):26-29.
|
|
|
|