尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法在尿常规检验中的应用价值

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the value of urinary sediment microscopic examination and urine routine dry chemical method in routine urine examination.Methods A total of 340 urine samples admitted to Shenyang Fifth People′s Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected as the research subjects, microscopic examination of urinary sediment, routine dry chemistry and the combination of the two methods were performed.The positive rates of white blood cell, urine protein and red blood cell of the three detection methods were compared.Results There were no significant differences in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between microscopic examination of urinary sediment and routine dry chemical method (P＞0.05).The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combined detection of the two methods were higher than those of the single method, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The positive rate of quantitative leukocyte in urine dry chemistry test was lower than that in urine sediment microscopic examination, and the positive rate of quantitative erythrocyte in urine sediment microscopic examination was higher than that in urine sediment microscopic examination, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Quantitative leukocyte positive rate and quantitative erythrocyte positive rate of combined detection were higher than those of urine routine dry chemical method and urinary sediment microscopic examination, the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Both urine sediment test and routine dry chemical urine test have clinical testing value, and the combined application of the two detection methods is more effective in reducing the probability of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, and improving the level of clinical testing.

Key words： Urine routine examination Urine sediment microscopy Urine routine dry chemical examination Combined detection

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIN Hua

Cite this article:

LIN Hua. Application value of urine sediment microscopic examination and urine routine dry chemical method in urine routine examination[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(8): 175-177.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I8/175

[1]	马国姣.尿分析仪、尿沉渣镜检白细胞的价值[J].中国医药指南，2020，18（12）：135-136.
[2]	任长松，黄建成，吴敏校，等.尿液干化学分析、尿沉渣定量分析及人工镜检在尿常规检查中的应用[J].医疗装备，2020，33（6）：12-13.
[3]	黄玉霞，曾连英，曹颖.干化学法与尿沉渣联合用于尿常规检验的临床效果观察[J].当代医学，2020，26（14）：23-25.
[4]	迟艳.尿常规干化学检测与镜检结果的对比及影响因素分析[J].基层医学论坛，2020，24（5）：690-691.
[5]	周晶.尿常规检验中尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法的应用研究[J].中国医药指南，2019，17（25）：102-103.
[6]	孙懿.尿沉渣全自动分析仪与显微镜检测法在尿常规检验中的应用效果比较[J].中国现代药物应用，2019，13（23）：237-238.
[7]	郭李娜，马菊芬，王鑫荣.尿常规检验干化学法和手工法结果的对比研究[J].中国医药指南，2019，17（16）：32-33.
[8]	陆洪群.尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法在尿常规检查中应用效果分析[J].国际感染杂志（电子版），2018，7（4）：135-136.
[9]	袁成立.尿常规检验中尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法的应用效果观察[J].临床检验杂志（电子版），2018，7（3）：519-521.
[10]	王晶晶，张维伦.干化学法联合尿沉渣联合用于尿常规检验的效果观察[J].数理医药学杂志，2020，33（7）：962-964.
[11]	章立锋.干化学法联合尿沉渣分析仪法用于尿常规检验的临床价值[J].中国药物经济学，2017，12（9）：136-138.
[12]	宋恒蕊.尿常规干化学法和手工沉渣镜检法检测尿白细胞数据差异分析[J].医学信息，2017，30（26）：178-179.
[13]	于培霞，赵晴，孟泽民，等.尿常规发现艾氏小杆线虫感染1例[J].中国血吸虫病防治杂志，2019，31（5）：565-566，569.
[14]	邹凤华，付莲花.尿常规检验中尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法的应用价值[J].当代医学，2019，25（15）：177-178.
[15]	马彧旻.浅析尿常规检验中尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法的应用[J].中国保健营养，2018，28（22）：241-242.
[16]	杨建柳，何琼，李熹娟.尿常规检验中尿沉渣镜检和尿常规干化学法的效果观察[J].中国保健营养，2018，28（7）：18.