|
|
|
| Comparison of the clinical effect of open hernia repair and laparoscopic hernia repair treating initial inguinal hernia of adult |
| ZHU Yi-sheng PENG Chuan-lin LI Dan |
| The Second Department of General Surgery,Suzhou First People′s Hospital,Anhui Province,Suzhou 235000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of open hernia repair and laparoscopic hernia repair treating initial inguinal hernia of adult.Methods The clinical data of 64 patients with initial inguinal hernia of adult who were admitted to Suzhou First People′s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the different treatment method,they were divided into group A (34 cases) and group B (30 cases),group A underwent open small incision tension-free hernia repair group (Lichtenstein operation),group B underwent laparoscopic hernia repair group (TAPP operation).The intraoperative bleeding,hospital stay,postoperative pain duration,postoperative anal exhaust time and hospitalization expenses were observed and compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of group A was shorter than that of group B,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The blood loss in group A was more than that in group B,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The postoperative anal exhaust time of group A was shorter than that of group B,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The length of stay in group A was longer than that in group B,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The hospitalization expenses in group A was less than that in group B,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic hernia repair and open tension-free hernia repair are safe and effective methods for the treatment of inguinal femoral hernia,but laparoscopic hernia repair will make patients bear high cost of medical treatment,so we should consider the operation plan comprehensively according to the patients′ various conditions and achieve individualized treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
朱红，何钱章，康雅琴.腹腔镜下不同术式与开放手术疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2020，14（1）：43-46.
|
| [2] |
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南（2018年版）[J].中国普通外科杂志，2018，27（7）：803-807.
|
| [3] |
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组，腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南（2017 版）[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（6）：401-406.
|
| [4] |
樊奇浩，时景伟，马冲.等.腹腔镜补片植入与无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的有效性和安全性对比[J].中华实验外科杂志，2018，35（7）：1364-1365.
|
| [5] |
Berger D.Evidence-Based hernia treatment in adults[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int，2016，113（9）：150-157.
|
| [6] |
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr，Forse RA.Clinical practice.Groin hernias in adults[J].N Engl J Med，2015，372（8）：756-763.
|
| [7] |
Cavazzola LT，Rosen MJ.Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair[J].Surg Clin North Am，2013，93（5）：1269-1279.
|
| [8] |
余国政，陈纪伟，胡航，等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术1034例临床分析[J].腹部外科，2017，30（3）：173.
|
| [9] |
曾国祥，黄文伟，黄修仿.TAPP 与Lichtenstein 术治疗成人腹股沟复发疝的疗效对比[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（5）：387-389.
|
| [10] |
陈元岩，王业增，钟俊新，等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补创伤反应的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志，2018，23（10）：751-752.
|
| [11] |
梁永辉，磨鹏诗，廖伟明.腹腔镜下修补术与开放式无张力修补术在老年腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2018，12（1）：34-37.
|
| [12] |
沈雄飞，江礼娟，王强.腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的学习曲线[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2016，10（1）：47-49.
|
| [13] |
Bokeler U，Schwarz J，Bittner R，et al.Teaching and traimng in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair（TAPP）：impact of the learning curve on patient outcome[J].Surg Endosc，2013，27（8）：2886-2893.
|
| [14] |
王海江，敬亚恒，周力波，等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝学习曲线[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（6）：407-412.
|
| [15] |
Kargar S，Shiryazdi SM，Zare M，et al.Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal（TAPP）versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair：a randomized trial study[J].Minerva Chir，2015，70（2）：83-89.
|
| [16] |
王钢普，李海，代国锋，等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线[J].腹腔镜外科杂志，2019，24（12）：929-932.
|
| [17] |
艾万朝，周旭坤，张成建，等.腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术的临床对比分析[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2016，10（4）：270-272.
|
|
|
|
