#br#
弹力线套扎吻合器与胶圈吻合器治疗混合痔的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (36 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of elastic wire ligation stapler(RPH－4)and loop stapler(RPH)in the treatment of hemorrhoids.Methods290 cases of patients with mixed hemorrhoids from March 2014 to June 2016 in our hospital as the research object,according to different surgical methods,divided into control group and intervention group,with 145 cases in each group.The control group was treated with RPH treatment,the intervention group used RPH－4therapy stapler.The operation time and length of stay in two groups were recorded,and the curative effect and postoperative complications were observed and analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups,and there was no statistical significance(P＞0.05).The postoperative hospital stay in the intervention group was significantly less than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The total effective rate of the control group was lower than that of the intervention group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The number of postoperative pain and postoperative anal distension sensation in the intervention group was significantly less than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The patients in the intervention group did not suffer from massive hemorrhage，which was significantly less than that of the control group，with statistical significance(P＜0.05).There were no complications such as anal incontinence,stenosis and perianal infection in the two groups.ConclusionRPH－4 and RPH can effectively treat hemorrhoid patients,but compared with traditional ligation therapy,RPH－4 has the advantages of simple operation,short treatment time,accurate curative effect and minimal invasion.It can obviously reduce the postoperative pain,postoperative anal distention,and the incidence of postoperative complications such as massive bleeding.

Key words： Elastic wire ligature device Loop stapler Hemorrhoid disease Perianal infection

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIANG Jia-ji
	LIAO Ming
	CHEN Xing-yi
	XIAO Liu

Cite this article:

LIANG Jia-ji,LIAO Ming,CHEN Xing-yi, et al. Comparison of the effect of elastic wire ligature stapler and apron stapler in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(29): 24-26转35.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2017/V24/I29/24

[1]	梁伟兵，冯文参，周美芳，等.套扎器改良内扎内注与吻合器痔切闭治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期痔的疗效比较[J].中国医学创新，2017，14（15）：12－16.
[2]	于曦，王楠，薛志有，等.RPH术与PPH术治疗混合痔的疗效对比[J].中国急救医学，2016，36（Z1）：89－90.
[3]	侍丽红.开环式微创痔吻合器治疗混合痔的临床护理探析[J].中外医学研究，2016，14（29）：129－130.
[4]	邓业巍，王东，张胜威.RPH治疗混合痔合并直肠粘膜内脱垂临床研究[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志，2015，89（5）：55－58.
[5]	石健，李晓博，卢灿省，等.选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗混合痔的临床疗效对比观察[J].安徽医药，2015，5（8）：1528－1529.
[6]	胡建文.胶圈套扎术联合消痔灵注射术治疗混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].内蒙古中医药，2017，36（2）：10.
[7]	张搏，王姗姗，徐月，等.弹力线套扎术与胶圈套扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔临床观察[J].中国中医急症，2017，26（2）：351-354.
[8]	陈明环.吻合器治疗混合痔的效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用，2015，9（19）：10-12.
[9]	孙东伟.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术与外剥内扎手术治疗环状混合痔对比研究[J].医药前沿，2016，6（36）：217-218.
[10]	郁惠峰.吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效对比研究[J].引文版（医药卫生），2015，45（1）：57-58.
[11]	翟焕聪，黄敬恩.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术和传统痔切除术治疗混合痔的效果对比[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（10）：67-69.
[12]	徐庆华，孙梅，杨妍妍.比较吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床效果[J].中外医疗，2017，36（6）：33-34.
[13]	李明.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗中重度混合痔150例临床观察[J].中国肛肠病杂志，2016，36（3）：34.
[14]	王少琴，刘丽彬，周丽.胶圈套扎术联合外痔切剥术治疗混合痔的临床疗效[J].2016，（2）：1-3.
[15]	冯丽英.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度混合痔的效果分析[J].中国临床新医学，2016，9（5）：428-430.